Verified Document

Relationship Between Language In Threatening Communications And The Threatener's Potential Risk For Violence Literature Review

¶ … people use threatening language, in what context, and when threatening words are a precursor to violence. Words can hurt, but at what point to the words actually precede a violent act. Many times a person will threaten violent action, but their hand will be staid by some unknown factor. The actual act is a function of both the threatener's intent and the strength of their desire to carry out the action (Jameson, 2004). Threat is accomplished in both the words that are used and the attitude with which they are presented (Erbert & Floyd, 2004). It is not the use of threatening words then as much as how the user, at first, intends them to be heard.

The best definition of threat may be one that the Supreme Court uses to determine if language is a "true threat" (Rothman, 2001) or not. Courts deem that unless a threat is truly intended to cause harm it is protected by the first amendment of the Constitution. What the court has determined is that a true threat the "reasonable speaker" or "reasonable listener" test (Rothman, 2001). "These tests essentially amount to an evaluation of whether or not a reasonable recipient of the statement would believe it constituted a threat" (Rothman, 2001). However, this, in and of itself, is not a helpful definition since even the different district courts differ in their determination of reasonable, and the Supreme Court has never chose to define what a reasonable person and an unreasonable person are.

Threatening...

Since language can be spoken and unspoken, threatening communication can also be either (Erbert & Floyd, 2004). When person is smiling, but they are using words that belie that physical symbol, it could be difficult to recognize whether the intentions of the speaker are violent or not. When the threatener is shouting it seems like a good outward cue that they are excited and close to a violent confrontation, but that is not always the case. As Joshua Gunn (2010) notes, public displays of speech that would once have been induced shock or even arrest are looked at as normal occurrences these days. The effect that media has had on the degradation of language and the normalcy of all forms of communication has had a profound affect on what is considered threatening communication (Gunn, 2010). What was once considered polite, and reasonable, is now seen as more threatening (such as some sexually harassing communications (Erbert & Floyd, 2004)) than shouted, but unintended, threats (Rothman, 2001). Threatening communication then is any communication to another person which could be construed as voicing a deleterious intent against that person (Jameson, 2004).
The final term to define is violence. The original question for this study was with…

Sources used in this document:
References

Erbert, L.A., & Floyd, K. (2004). Affectionate expressions as face-threatening acts: Receiver assessments. Communication Studies, 55(2). 254-267.

Gunn, J. (2010). On speech and public release. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 13(2). 1-16.

Jameson, J.K. (2004). Negotiating autonomy and connection through politeness: A dialectical approach to organizational conflict management. Western Journal of Communication, 68(3). 257-271.

Kahn, H., & Schelling, T. (2009). On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New Brunswick, ME: Transaction Publishers.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Threatening Communication and Violent Actions:
Words: 767 Length: 2 Document Type: Discussion Chapter

In many cases of threat, communication from the perpetrator is often the only piece of information available against the offender and for this reason, researchers are now trying to figure out if communication can reveal offender's psycho-pathy and the degree to which he/she can be dangerous to the target. Our research shows that some physiological reactions during the threat giving incident would also say a great deal about escalation

Threatening Language Threats and Worse
Words: 674 Length: 2 Document Type: Literature Review

99). Brewster (2000), looking specifically at the question of how threatening language and physical violence are related in intimate relationships. Looking at hundreds of individuals involved in intimate relationships that included verbal threats, some of which went on to include physical violence, she also found that there is a clear cycle of dynamics between the individuals, in which verbal threats generally intermingle with physical violence and in which certain

Psycholinguistics and Threat Prediction: Analyzing
Words: 1160 Length: 4 Document Type: Discussion Chapter

Certainly, an incarceration, simple arrest, questioning, or data gathering on individuals such as wire taps would produce a plethora of data that could be used the statistical analysis of potential, real, or existing threats. Some individuals are under surveillance or incarceration for extended periods of time (such as gang leaders, Mafiosi, etc.) and would provide a huge quantity of analyzable data that could be fed to the National Center for

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now