Reebok and Nike are athletic apparel companies with differing promotional strategies and marketing. They sell similar products, particularly sneakers and are known globally as companies that promote athletic lifestyles through their sporting goods. The footwear industry, for which Nike and Reebok have their niche is a tough industry to not only market in, but also sustain profits. Both companies although different in their approach, have managed to create a brand that appeals to a wide and broad market. Researching their promotional strategies and company profiles, the differences and similarities become visible lending to possible analysis of both of the companies' strong and weak points.
Reebok's promotional campaigns are different from Nike's. A good example of this is Reebok's 2002 promotional campaign using a well-known Irish footballer as the central focus. The company timed its advertisements with the footballer before the beginning of the World Cup of that same year. His involvement in the Republic of Ireland team was to play an integral point in catching the attention of consumers. This strategy backfired when the player was sent home by the team's manager. The negative publicity received from the untimely dismissal forced Reebok to abandon the campaign. The company lost all of the contracts and recording costs that had been bought before the footballer was sacked as captain.
Nike's promotional strategy although uses celebrity endorsement from time to time relies on emotional branding to reach their target group. Nike's brand strategy is all about building a powerful brand. They believe customer loyalty will come inspirational images that promote a struggle against hero and foe, where the victor emerges triumphant. The victor in this case is the consumer. The consumer battles against the foe, "laziness" and through the use of the company's sneakers, they defeat "laziness" and become something greater.
Both promotional strategies offer consumer a means of achieving more than they are used to. They both wish to inspire the consumer into becoming something better than what they are now. Reebok does this by using inspirational and well-known figures to show their product helps these notable athletes achieve the results they have and Nike inspires consumers by using their products a means of combating negative aspects of personality like laziness (Knight, 2002, pp. 541-570). Although the strategies here are different, they achieve similar outcomes which are to inspire and motivate the consumer.
Recommendations to better both Reebok and Nike's promotional strategies would be to support the everyday individual to achieve more through "little things." To begin, Nike wishes to promote hero emotional branding. This although effective, doesn't reach everyone. Some people already have the mindset of achieving and do not feel a connection when it comes to this promotional method.
Instead Nike can focus their campaign on giving average people their product, sneakers, and having them achieve "little victories" every day. For instance, a commercial can feature an overweight woman with Nike sneakers on. She slips them on after a long day of work and goes and climbs up stairs as she heads out to take the subway. This kind of emotional branding makes the consumer feel like they can use these sneakers to do more in their lives and become more active, thus instilling confidence in them to do more and therefore be more. This can be a long-term promotion as people of various walks of life can perform in the commercials.
People like to achieve. That's why people play games like "Flappy Bird" and "World of Warcraft." They want to feel like they can accomplish something even if it is small. Motivating consumers by making them see the product can get them these small accomplishments really helps in instilling in the consumer loyalty and confidence in not just the product, but themselves. They will feel that attachment and therefore consider the sneakers when they want to achieve something positive in their lives.
The same can be done with Reebok. Reebok likes to use celebrity endorsement, which many companies do. However, if they go instead for real life interviews with every day people discussing how good they feel in Reebok sneakers and how much they got done in for instance, a workout, while wearing the sneakers, it'll make consumers again attach positive emotions and experiences with the sneaker. It is all about relating something to something else. In this case, the connection is made through getting more done, being more active, with wearing Reebok sneakers. This can be a short-term promotional strategy as people like to see what others...
5% of total liabilities. Their retained earnings, on the other hand, total $5.073 billion. The heavy use of retained earnings is partially explained by their view of themselves as a growth company. While they pay a dividend, Nike prefers to re-invest much of its profits back into expansion. They do not feel that the market has matured sufficiently to stop their aggressive growth strategy. Another consideration in their capital structure
Nike Women's Case Nike's Global Women's Fitness Business: Driving Strategic Integration Case Study Need for Organizational Change Business Case Kotter's 8 Step Model for Change Create Urgency Build the Change Team Create a Vision for the Change Communicate the Vision Remove Obstacles Create Short-Term Wins Build on the Change and Anchor the Changes in the Corporate Culture Other conditions for change. Need for Organizational Change It became evident to many executives at Nike that women had evolving needs that were not being met under
Nike Case Study Scenario which Sparked Change The scenario which sparked the need for change was the sheer success of Nike as a brand for athletic apparel, athletic shoes and equipment. However, this was a success that company experience only in terms of men and menswear. "According to Mindy Grossman, the company's former vice president of global apparel, 'some of the issues in the past was that there was a faction in
Nike's Strategic And Financial Position Analysis Nike is a globally recognized multinational corporation founded by the Stanford Graduate School of Business graduate, Phil Knight, and Bill Bowerman who was the track and field coach at the University of Oregon. The two appear to be a natural fit as each hailed from a background that would appreciate the underlying design that goes into creating a quality running shoe. Nike's global operations in aggregate
Nike Market Research The author of this report is to cover and evaluate the perceived customer service scores and perceptions that exist for Nike and from its customer base. Nike is based on Beaverton, Oregon and has established itself as a giant in the shoe industry both in the United States and around the world. However, the perceptions of Nike's customers are important to pay attention to because of competitors snapping
The case is written in a simple but comprehensive manner, focused on the main highlights of Nike's activity. It is useful for the specialized economists as it presents real and clear facts, but it can also be useful to the novice economist or the simple individual, who wishes to get some insight into the Nike culture and ways. The main purpose of the report is to inform the reader about the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now