US as Superpower?

From a security perspective, having a say in global politics, such as military actions and negotiations, can certainly have its benefits and protect U.S. interests. Thus, if the US maintains a significant presence on the global stage, it can safeguard these interests. At the same time, as the U.S. economy is deeply tied into the global market, with extensive international trade and globalized supply chains, a global role can help protect and enhance these interests, boosting the domestic economy and securing American jobs (American Government, n.d.).

There is also the consideration of cultural influence and soft power of the United States. However, many states, particularly those in the Global South, are now aligning with Russia and China, after seeing the way the US has used its soft power in recent years. The US seized Russian assets and now exports liberal ideology that some states do not want.

That said, there is also a good argument for the United States to return to a more isolationist stance. One major advantage of such a shift would be a greater focus on domestic issues and production. Too many jobs have gone overseas, and if supply chains break down it means production at home cannot go forward. More jobs here means less poverty, and it would also mean updating infrastructure, improving education, and basically investing in the future of the nation.

The second big issue relates to resource allocation. The U.S. spends a huge portion of its budget on military and foreign interventions. Why not use these resources on domestic programs, addressing issues like poverty, healthcare, and education? Plus, the U.S. could potentially avoid involvement in foreign conflicts. This could save both American lives and resources, reducing the human and financial costs of war.

Ultimately, a more isolationist stance could potentially protect U.S. sovereignty better. This would involve reducing the influence of other nations and international bodies on American policy, ensuring that U.S. interests are always at the forefront. The US does not need to be fighting wars for other countries. It can maintain a degree of global influence while also focusing more on pressing domestic issues.

References

American Government. (n.d.). https://textbooks.whatcom.edu/amgov/