Verified Document

The Reasons The Americans Lost Vietnam Essay

Related Topics:

As Olson and Roberts state, “If anything, the war made Vietnam more dedicated to communism, not less,” (x). So what went wrong in Vietnam? The answer is pretty much everything: American hubris, a lack of understanding of the history and culture of the people, and an overestimation of what the latest munitions tools could accomplish. The United States fought the war with an unbridled and unchecked sense of righteousness, ignorant of the importance of international and domestic support for the cause. Persistence in a lost cause led not to victory but to profound demoralization among the troops, which caused an even longer-range effect of undermining trust in the American government. The first failure was a lack of understanding of the culture, history, and worldview of the enemy. Reflecting on the war honestly, Robert McNamara admits that the Americans exhibited a “profound ignorance of the history, culture, and politics” of not just Vietnam but of the entire region (Olson and Roberts x). Of course, the United States was not alone in demonstrating cultural superiority; the French before them had done the same during the colonial era and their legacy likewise failed to induce Vietnam to become sympathetic to the West (Olson and Roberts 16). Without an admission that the world does not revolve around Western Europe or North America, it is impossible to genuinely devise workable diplomatic or military strategies. The same lessons can be applied to almost every other futile war the United States has involved itself in: most notably Iraq and Afghanistan (Skidmore).

The second thing that went wrong was that the United States believed that it could pursue its anti-communist pogrom without the support of its own people, let alone the international community. McNamara admits...

Olson and James also mention the fact that the Vietnamese communists won because they did so well to garner the support of the peasants of their nation; the Vietnamese were fighting for something; the Americans were fighting against something, and there was a difference (13).
A third and more clearly military strategic issue that caused the American loss was related to the underestimation of guerilla fighters who understood their own geography. The Americans had not learnt the lessons from history, as when the Finns fought off the Russians because of their superior ability to handle harsh weather conditions. Yet the Americans arrogantly imagined they could defeat a people simply because they had more advanced weapons and more money. They were summarily humiliated. Morelock also notes that American military strategy failed because it was reactive, as opposed to proactive, allowing North Vietnamese fighters to take control of the pace and method of fighting (1). This strategy “placed American forces permanently on the strategic defensive,” and also created the “localized war of attrition” that would have dragged on even longer (Morelock 1).Sandhu, Ruckus, and Geddes also point out that the loss combined elements of cultural arrogance and poor military strategy in that the Americans did not realize that the VietCong were “vastly superior in their tactics and numbers,” (1). Once again, the Americans failed to learn from history, as the same problem had beseiged the French. As Schroth puts it, the Vietnamese “outsmarted the French, pounding them with artillery from higher slopes and shooting down planes delivering food and ammunition,” (1).

Finally, demoralization was a problem. Related to…

Sources used in this document:

References

Morelock, Jerry D. “Strategy for Failure.” Historynet. http://www.historynet.com/strategy-failure-americas-war-vietnam.htm

Olson, James.S. & Roberts, Randy.W. Where the Domino Fell. 6th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

Sandhu, Nevin, Charlie Ruckus and Otis Geddes. The Vietnam War. http://oandcvietnam.weebly.com/what-went-wrong.html

Schroth, Raymond A. “Ken Burns’s ‘Vietnam’ revisits a barbaric war and asks, what went wrong?” America Magazine. 13 Sept, 2017. https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2017/09/13/ken-burnss-vietnam-revisits-barbaric-war-and-asks-what-went-wrong

Skidmore, David. “Vietnam: Who was right about what went wrong – and why it matters in Afghanistan.” Salon. 8 Sept, 2017. https://www.salon.com/2017/09/18/vietnam-who-was-right-about-what-went-wrong-and-why-it-matters-in-afghanistan_partner/

“Why Did America Lose the War?” BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/vietnam/usgetsoutrev2.shtml


Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Vietnam and the Rules of Engagement
Words: 1306 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Vietnam -- Rules of Engagement There are many reasons given for the fact that the United States lost the war in Vietnam, and that America was basically pushed out of the country by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army even though the U.S. had far more firepower. Among the more credible reasons America lost the war was the failure on the part of the political leaders back in Washington

Vietnam Lessons Learned From the American Experience
Words: 695 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Vietnam Lessons learned from the American experience of the Vietnam War. Vietnam has been called America's first and only completely 'lost' war, even though it was never officially declared to be a war at all. The clumsy diplomatic relations which characterized American involvement in Vietnam from the beginning were a harbinger of troubles to come. The roots of the conflict can be traced to the aftermath of World War II, when French-backed

Vietnam: An American Ordeal Sixth
Words: 868 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Although Diem initially appeared to assist the Westerners in their efforts to install democracy in the country he proved to be corrupt, being more interested in his own well-being and in his financial situation than in conditions in the country. The Vietnamese were determined to support theories relating to personal leadership because they could no longer accept being controlled by the French, the Japanese, or by the Americans. It was

Vietnam American Society and the
Words: 2711 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

As Vickers (1989) notes, "…the size and intensity of U.S. intervention was met by escalation in the size and intensity of opposition to the war here at home'. (Vickers, 1989, p. 100) Vickers and many other critics state categorically that the anti-war movement in the country was "…a critical factor in preventing the U.S. from achieving victory over communist forces in Vietnam…" and that, American public opinion indeed turned out

Vietnam Antiwar Lit Review Vietnam Anti-War Literature
Words: 3225 Length: 9 Document Type: Essay

Vietnam Antiwar Lit Review Vietnam Anti-War Literature Review The Vietnam War marked a lot of "firsts" in relation to the course of American history. It is the first war that the United States lost. It is one of the first major military actions where actual war was not declared. It is also the first war that was brought to a halt by a public uproar and political fallout. The people were a

Vietnam War As of Today
Words: 3033 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Paper

Vietnam: An Unpopular War VIETNAM WAR 12 The paper takes a look into the unpopularity of the Vietnam War and the failed strategies, which resulted in the defeat of the U.S. army in Vietnam. A lot of news and opinions exist regarding the Vietnam War, which tells us about its unpopularity (Writer Thoughts). Several reasons exist about this specific topic and this paper addresses those reasons. Different scholars have put forward arguments regarding the

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now