Business and Employment Law
Business Law and Labor & Employment Law
Employees are classified in different categories. Federal and state law does not explicitly define the categories, but employers generally categorize employees on the basis of duties performed, number of hours worked, and duration of job. Accordingly, employees fall in three main groups: permanent (full-time), part time, and temporary employees (PayScale, 2009). A permanent employee is an employee who works a typical work week for an indefinite duration, while a part-time employee works fewer hours than the typical work week. Temporary employees may work full-time or part-time, though for a definite period of time. Though federal law does not define the above categories, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) classifies employees as either non-exempt or exempt employees (Society for Human Resource Management [SHRM], 2014). The former denotes employees whose work is covered by FLSA and who are subject to overtime and minimum wage regulations, while the latter denotes employees whose work is not subject to FLSA provisions on overtime and minimum wage.
Classifying employees correctly is crucial for a number of reasons. First, classification helps in determining employees' eligibility for benefits, especially non-statutory benefits. For instance, part-time employees are often excluded from health insurance coverage. Additionally, correct classification of employees ensures employees have a clear understanding of their employment status, especially with respect to their conditions of work (SHRM, 2014).
Question 2
Various federal laws, including the Civil Rights Act 1964, FLSA 1963, the Equal Pay Act 1963, and the Equality Act 2015, prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of racial background, sex, gender, pregnancy, national origin, religion, national origin, , compensation, and fringe benefits (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC], 2009).
Lee and Larry can sue Lopez, Inc. for race-based employment discrimination under federal law. The company has a historically employed Hispanics only and even hired Hispanics for the recent vacancies of a sales person and a computer programmer. In other words, the company evidently favors individuals from a certain race (Latin American) over others. Rather than considering skills and qualifications, the company apparently prioritizes racial background, an indication of racially-motivated workplace discrimination.
It is, however, important to note that proving racial discrimination against an employer can be quite difficult as in most cases there may be no direct evidence such as memos instructing managers to hire candidates from a specific race. Nonetheless, this does not necessarily mean that Larry and Lee cannot claim for workplace racial discrimination. First, given the company's history of recruitment and the recruitment of the sales person and the programmer, it is quite apparent that they were denied employment…
Racial Discrimination With the Northern Territories National Emergency Response Act of July 2007, the Liberal government of John Howard suspended the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975, in violation of international law, and sent in the military to enforce new draconian decrees on Aboriginal Communities. In part, this was a reflection of old fashioned racism and paternalism, which was still commonplace in Australia despite a thin veneer of shallow tolerance and multiculturalism.
Racial Discrimination in the Workplace Until fairly recent times, blacks and other minority groups were denied almost all economic and educational opportunities, including government programs that distributed homestead lands, oil, gas and mineral rights, television and radio licenses, federally-guaranteed mortgages and business loans and airline routes (Feagin 3). Before the 1960s, most blacks and Hispanics held only menial, low-paying jobs and were denied ownership of land and business or access to
Racial Discrimination: How it Affects the People of South Africa and Its Impact on the Field of Social Work Racial discrimination has for long been a part of the South African history. It is the country of Apartheid. Apartheid was the official policy of racial segregation implemented legally in South Africa by the ruling National Party governments from 1948 till 1994. Under the apartheid legislation, the rights of the non-white inhabitants
Racial Discrimination in the Context Of the Death Penalty There is much controversy with regard to topics like racial discrimination and the death penalty in the contemporary society. When these two come together the matter is even more controversial, taking into account that opponents to both concepts can come together with the purpose of expressing their issues with the idea of racial discrimination cases in relationship with individuals sentenced to death.
Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty The United States Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that at the end of the year 2000 that there was 1,381,892 total number of prisoners under the jurisdiction of federal or state adult correctional authorities (State pp). During 2000, the prison population rose at the lowest rate since 1972 and had the smallest absolute increase since 1980 (State pp). Relative to the number
Discrimination Law "Race Color Discrimination, " Eight categories encompass race discrimination Essay Question: Section 15 EEOC's Compliance Manual, "Race Color Discrimination, " guidance analyzing charges race color discrimination Title VII Civil Rights Act 1964. Discrimination essay question: Joe's Bakery advertised in the local newspaper for an assistant baker. Muhammad, a recent honors graduate of the Culinary School of America, applied for the position and was told that the position had been filled. Muhammad
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now