The quantitative design of the research study conducted by Allen, Holland and Reynolds (2015) as depicted in their article “The Effect of Bullying on Burnout in Nurses: The Moderating Role of Psychological Detachment” in the Journal of Advanced Nursing is based on a cross-sectional design method in which data was collected using survey questionnaires filled out by the participants. The data was self-reported and anonymously completed by 762 Australian RNs in 2011. The design of the study was oriented towards identifying the “relationship between bullying and burnout” among nurses (Allen et al., 2015, p. 381). The study also sought to assess the effect that nurse detachment might have in terms of serving as a buffer between bullying and burnout. The study developed two hypotheses for testing, using measures that were validated using “existing, published scales, which had previously demonstrated good levels of validity and reliability” (p. 385). Hierarchical regression was performed using SPSS software for both hypotheses, once all the data was accumulated from the questionnaires, which was scored using the Likert-scale. The strengths of this design are that surveys can allow researchers to obtain data in relatively uniform and easy manner. As Auty, Farrington & Coid (2015)...
563). Because this method is so widespread, it is a recognized accepted practice, as it gives researchers access to information that can be quantified and tested using analysis tools like SPSS and the regression method of analysis. The Likert-scale is a practical means of scoring responses to allow for statistical analysis. So this combination of research design, methods of data collection and data analysis make this type of quantitative study especially strong. In other words, this design can enable the researcher to measure the variables it intends to measure.References
Allen, B. C., Holland, P., & Reynolds, R. (2015). The Effect of Bullying on Burnout in Nurses: The Moderating Role of Psychological Detachment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 381-390. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bfa0/a66f81e5930599df9391ccdf504c3cf1aac2.pdf
Auty, K. M., Farrington, D. P., & Coid, J. W. (2015). The validity of self-reported convictions in a community sample: Findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. European Journal of Criminology, 12(5), 562-580.
Gemming, L., Jiang, Y., Swinburn, B., Utter, J., & Mhurchu, C. N. (2014). Under-reporting remains a key limitation of self-reported dietary intake: an analysis of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68(2), 259.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research A comparative analysis of quantitative and qualitative research designs In the conduct of sociological research, the qualitative and quantitative research designs remain the predominant structures in which scientific studies on social phenomena are discovered, analyzed, and interpreted. However, the emergence of quantitative research design prior to the development of the qualitative design created a dichotomy in the field of social science research, wherein preferences for each research design
Schwarz, K., Mion, P., Hudock, D., & Litman, G. (2008). Telemonitoring of heart failure patients and their caregivers: A pilot randomized controlled study. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(1), 18-26. Telemonitoring know-how provides one of the most auspicious alternatives to the delivery of health care services at the home of a patient. This research study was purposed to assess the effect of a primary care-based telemonitoring intervention on the rate of recurrence
This numerical data always involves judgments what the number means. For this reason, Trochim concludes that quantitative and qualitative data are virtually inseparable, since "(n) exists in a vacuum or can be considered totally devoid of the other." Ferch (1998) also explores the difference between quantitative and qualitative research. He notes that q) uantitative research is objective; qualitative research is subjective. Quantitative research seeks explanatory laws; qualitative research aims at in-depth
experimental design feasible? Why or why not? • What suggestions can you make for future studies of the DARE program? The aims of DARE are long-term in nature, namely to encourage students to not abuse drugs over the course of their lifetimes. The only way to test this aim is to conduct a longitudinal study of a representative body of DARE graduates over at least a twenty-year period, to see if
Mixed Methods Study Design What's Wrong with Mixed Methodology Morris and Burkett (2011) witnessed the relatively recent emergence of what has been called "mixed methods" research. A study using a mixed methods design would meet both quantitative and qualitative evaluative criteria. From the author's perspective and that of others cited in their publication, quantitative and qualitative research designs are effectively mutually exclusive. The only concession that Morris and Burkett (2011) seemed to
There is also the perpetual problem with qualitative research: namely because it is a single sample size, the study might only be representative of one particular population. However, some qualitative researchers argue that any type of research is subjective: they believe that even the approach of quantitative research disguises idiosyncratic aspects of reality and even the most rigorously empirical construct says more about a researcher's biases than an external reality.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now