Quality Improvement Presentation Poster: Interprofessional Collaboration Practice Program
Abstract
This poster describes an intervention applying interprofessional collaboration originally developed to address suboptimal Type II diabetes patient outcomes in a tertiary care facility but with wider clinical improvement applications. Implementation will model prior successful integrative staff training driving coordinated physician, nurse, and pharmacist participation in diabetic patient case management. Practices include joint daily patient visits and care huddles promoting team decision-making and preventing medication/diagnostic issues through enhanced communication. Benchmarking after introduction is expected to replicate published findings showing statistically significant improvements in controlling patient A1C, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides. The research to date confirms that clinical improvements will likely parallel heightened staff job satisfaction and patient perceptions of holistic wellbeing support. Theoretically, uniting diverse expertise creates optimized interventions harnessing the problem-solving strengths of different health professions. Mutual understanding counteracts isolated perspectives. Together with better health indicators, interprofessional collaboration inherently improves the care experience through cross-disciplinary insight and role modeling team dynamics. Staff inclusion and fulfillment complete the Quadruple Aims core goals covered. In sum, properly implemented and administered, interprofessional collaboration leverages collective knowledge while operationalizing the empathy intrinsic to quality care missing when providers remain detached. It promises better medical and human outcomes.
The Importance of an Interprofessional Collaboration Practice Program to Improve Clinical Outcomes
Quality Improvement Method
The selected quality improvement method is an interprofessional collaboration practice program based on its demonstrated efficacy in multiple clinical settings (Pakkanen et al., 2022).
An interprofessional collaborative practice program involves healthcare professionals from different disciplines working together to provide comprehensive and coordinated patient care (Wiarsih et al., 2023).
This approach emphasizes effective communication, shared decision-making, and mutual respect among...
…program strategically integrates a wide array of clinicians as appropriate, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, case managers and other health professionals to cooperate in patient-centered care activities (Wilbur et al., 2023).Rather than using isolated decision-making, interprofessional collaboration promotes team-based patient visits, regular daily briefings to review cases, group documentation in shared records, and consolidated care planning meetings to formulate mutually agreed-upon interventions.
Interprofessional Team Benefits
The interprofessional collaborative setting leverages diverse expertise through open communication and joint accountability in virtually all clinical settings.
In addition, collaboration facilitates and fosters mutual perspective-taking and trust in collective knowledge (Bogossian & Craven, 2021).
Overall Project Benefits
Properly implemented and administered, an interprofessional collaboration practice program provides a wide array of benefits. For instance, core activities such as collaborative rounds, joint patient education, and cross-training cultivate shared purpose and problem-solving centered on understanding whole patient…
References
Bogossian, F., & Craven, D. (2021). A review of the requirements for interprofessional education and interprofessional collaboration in accreditation and practice standards for health professionals in Australia. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(5), 691–700.
Fleming, R., & Willgerodt, M. A. (2017). Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and School Nursing: A Model for Improved Health Outcomes. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 22(3), 1.
Janes, T. L., Rees, J.-L., & Zupan, B. (2022). Is interprofessional education a valued contributor to interprofessional practice and collaboration within allied health in Australia and New Zealand: A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 36(5), 750–760.
Quality Improvement in Health Care Institutions Quality Improvement Report Report on quality improvement Quality improvement in health care involves activities undertaken to elevate the patient experience and the health of the population. It also encompasses an improvement of the health care provider experience (Leonard, Graham, & Bonacum, 2010). To attain a set standard of quality in health care a there is need to appreciate that quality improvement is a continuous process that require:
Quality Improvement in Healthcare Nearly all healthcare organizations today are aware of the Quality Improvement (QI) movement and seek to actively instill their businesses with such elements. In fact, the past few decades have shown the QI movement to be the main approach for healthcare organizations to measure performance and engage in lasting changes (Colton, 2000). The foundations of QI reside with its origins which come from multiple arenas: "in systems
In terms of communication within the hospice setting, this might occur by means of communicating with patients and their families to determine whether they experience their care setting in an optimal manner. If this is not the case, strategies are implemented to address the commonly experienced difficulties. CONCLUSION In conclusion, communication is a vitally important part of any care setting. Patients and their families must feel that they are the recipients
Quality Improvement: "Chick-n-Gravy Dinner Line" The case study at hand deals with complaints being lodged against a product line, "Chick-n-Gravy Dinners" that are sold within a specific chain of restaurants. Upon initial investigation into the complaints, the firm was able to pinpoint that many of the complaints centered upon five product defects: under-filled packages, a missing item, spills/mixed items, unacceptable taste, and improperly sealed packages. In order to begin to remedy
The Ambulatory Care Services did not throw out procedural related indicators under their previous QA program. However, measurement became periodic rather than continuous. According to D'Aquila, Habegger, and Willwerth, continuous monitoring of the process-related monitoring should begin only when periodic reporting demonstrates less than 100% compliance. In contrast to QA teams who look for wrongdoers to blame, CQI focuses on finding problems to correct. D'Aquila, Habegger, and Willwerth explain that
Quality Improvement Strategies Describe each methodology you researched. What are the pros and cons of each methodology? Choose one methodology to move forward with for your organizational QI plan. Explain why you chose that methodology over the others. Hospital executives and quality improvement managers have experienced success at varying levels due to the introduction of varying concepts of Continuous Quality Improvement and Total Quality Management in different hospital operations for the past
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now