CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Criminal Justice: Qualities of Effective Teams Research Paper
Several advantages and disadvantages go side by side with group decision-making. One of the key advantages is the individual strength of every team member who possesses a distinct set of skills that come together to make valuable decisions (Anca, 2008). Pushing one another outside their comfort zones and supporting each other to achieve the group goals is a form of self-improvement gained while working in groups (Bradley, 2016). This grouping mechanism works well for enhanced collaboration as everyone gets to give their share of participation. It works well, especially in crisis management, motivation and engagement, and the evidence response process for certain departments of the organizations. Interdepartmental teams operate for these particular aims, as redesigning the performance boost is a major proficiency element. A strong sense of team spirit is instilled by group decision-making, and every team member feels connected when they know their input has been acknowledged. Where individual decisions would be biased sometimes, the group decisions outweigh the negatives with positive mindsets so that better operational solutions should be hypothesized with the belief that misinterpretations would be prevented and errors could be avoided.
However, group decision-making is not void of disadvantages; the primary one is the entire process's time consumption. It takes extra time to wait for every team member to give their opinions and then finalize the closing decision. Several viewpoints must be considered before reaching a conclusion, which sometimes creates confusion or discrepancies. The risk of conflict also exists as people whose opinions have not been considered feel left out or might get demotivated to perform as a dedicated team member afterward. The general efficiency of the group might be jeopardized when the share of responsibility becomes distorted by the demoralization factor, hurting the group's functioning.
References
Anca, S.S. (2008). Groups Decision-Making within the Organization. Studies and Scientific Researches Economics Edition, 94-97. DOI:10.29358/sceco.v0i13.29
Bradley, D. (2016, December 7). Teams: A pathway to organizational success. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/teams-a-pathway-to-organizational-success
Criminal Justice Trends The trends of the past, present and future that outline the borders connecting the criminal justice system components and their links adjoining the society is, beyond doubt, an authentic relationship that the law and society have established. Criminal justice has been affected by various trends in the times gone by. This is because trends keep changing with the passage of time. Therefore, it is exceedingly important for the
Criminal justice system normally refers to the compilation of the prevailing federal; state accompanied by the local public agencies those pacts with the crime problem. These corresponding agencies procedure suspects, defendants accompanied by the convicted offenders and are normally mutually dependent insofar as the prevailing decisions of the single agency influence other supplementary agencies (Cole & Smith, 2009). The fundamental framework of the underlying system is normally granted through the
For example, Cook County, IL, has built a network of support for juvenile female offenders within the local community. The county has developed its own gender-specific assessment and treatment guidelines and has trained youth-facing community workers on assessing juvenile offenders and recommending programming. (Juvenile Justice Journal, 1999, p. 30). Also, the county designed a pilot network of social service agencies in order to provide a community-based continuum of care. (Juvenile
Criminal Justice Leadership Strategies and Practices Leadership Strategies and Practice Examples and Analysis of Roles Organizational culture Behavioral Theory Planning The criminal justice leadership strategies are also partly similar to business practices followed in commercial organizations. However, the difference in chain of command, organizational culture and theories applicable for criminology are unique. The criminal justice organizations also develop strategies that are relevant for their organizational culture as well as with respect to the community relations. These
Criminal Justice System: Ethics in Criminal Procedure Ethics refers to the principles of morality that govern an individual's behavior. Ethics, therefore, provides the basis through which an individual defines, and distinguishes between the good and the bad. This implies that it is ethics that provides the framework for the duties and responsibilities an individual owes to himself, and to the community. Today, ethics define how corporations, professionals, and individuals relate with
Criminal justice system refers to either the state or federal set of agencies and processes which are created by governments to control crime and to engage in penalties and discipline on those who break the law and who hurt others or damage property. "There is no single criminal justice system in the United States but rather many similar, individual systems. How the criminal justice system works in each area depends
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now