Research Paper Undergraduate 1,236 words

Qi Plan Part IV Implementing and Revising

Last reviewed: August 18, 2013 ~7 min read
Abstract

The preliminaryeducation with respect to goals and objectives including the potential benefits are provided by the higher management. The initial orientation will be followed by the role specific training .The additional information and details regarding the potential working and implementation are provided through training sessions specifically designed for particular staff members. The job based and role specific training and support is provided through dedicated staff members of implementation team. The job responsibilities and system requirements are also provided to staff members through informative instructions (Mueller, 2009).

Quality Improvement Plan: Implementing and Revising

Authority, structure, and organization for the Mayo Clinic

Board of directors

The implementation of quality improvement initiatives require a detailed authority designation, structure, and organization of the compete project. Mayo clinic is known for its quality and technology initiatives. The programs are conceived and implemented using progressive technological approaches. The project management and organizational oversight structures are developed in accordance with the requirements. As a result the coordinated and coherent efforts of the clinic provide an overall governance model for successful project completion. The authority, structure, and organizational roles are discussed in the following sections.

Authority, structure, and organization for the Mayo Clinic:

Board of directors:

Board of directors is responsible for review and approval of the plan. The pros and cons of the plan are discussed in the broad meetings. The financial requirements and capital investment requirements are also elaborated and approved by the board members. The investment requirements are also analyzed in terms of their return and benefits for the clinic's overall performance. The value added by the implantation of project and required changes are incorporated. The board members approve the overall implementation of project and dedicate the executive leadership role to responsible individuals.

Executive leadership:

Executive leadership's role is authenticated by the board members and the technical handling of the project is also assigned to the members of executive teams. The overall governance of implementation is the primary objective of the executive leadership. The governance structure included the executive committee. It was led by physician and subordinated by the clinical practice representatives, IT, and members of management engineering team. The team coordinated with all the technical and implementation issues.

Quality improvement committee:

The quality improvement committee is also setup by the executive leadership including the medical staff, departmental staff, and middle management of the clinic. The members of the quality improvement committee were responsible for suggesting the improvement areas providing the details about their recommendations. The quality improvement committee identifies and evaluates the required improvement areas and later presents their findings in the executive meetings. The quality improvement is also one of the major objectives of Mayo Clinic fulfilled through the organized structure.

Medical staff:

The medical staff is also involved in the implementation of organizational objectives. The medical and healthcare needs of the patients are fulfilled through the dedicated medical staff members. The medical staff of the clinic provides valuable insight for implementation and improvement of the quality objectives. The members of medical staff are represented in the quality improvement committee as well as the executive leadership in order to successfully implement their recommend improvements.

Middle management:

The middle level management is responsible for providing direction and instructions to the front line staff. It is also responsible for the communication and representation of higher management. The department level objectives and goals are provided by the senior management which is carried forward by the relevant middle management. The departmental performance is evaluated and reported by the middle management.

Department staff:

Department staff is also categorized as front line staff of Mayo Clinic. The departmental goals and objectives are performed by the staff. The departmental staff for patient care and other relevant function that comes in direct contact with the consumers should be highly efficient. The required level of expertise and trainings is also provided to the departmental staff. Interdepartmental coordination is required to achieve organizational goals.

Communication:

Communication is one of the essential functions while implementing a change in operations and adopting technological advancement in operations. The role of higher management is also critical in providing necessary information to the relevant staff members. The communications plan is established through the executive team and it is also implemented to achieve higher results. The management requires detailed reports about the performance and achievement of objectives. The structured approach is adopted to collect data, analyze, and prepare reports for management. However the top leadership is considerate in terms of system development. The input received form the users were incorporated within the system. The implementation also required support for users (Kolker, & Story, 2011).

Mayo Clinic has integrated technology and computer-based system to facilitate operations. In such circumstances communication plays a vital role in addressing organizational and functional issues arising from the implementation. The detailed communication plan addresses the issues related to early communication of awareness related issues. The staff and patient related benefits are also communicated from the higher leadership to middle and front line management. The careful emphasis on providing assistance for use during and after implementation is also integral part of the implementation plan.

Education:

The preliminaryeducation with respect to goals and objectives including the potential benefits are provided by the higher management. The initial orientation will be followed by the role specific training .The additional information and details regarding the potential working and implementation are provided through training sessions specifically designed for particular staff members. The job based and role specific training and support is provided through dedicated staff members of implementation team. The job responsibilities and system requirements are also provided to staff members through informative instructions (Mueller, 2009).

Annual evaluation:

The annual improvement assessment is performed through data collection and analysis of reports. The patient related record information and service levels are specifically defined in order to perform evaluation (Chute, Beck, Fisk, & Mohr, 2010). The project benefits and validity of achievement are evaluated with the baseline measurements. The pre-implementation and post-implementation baseline measures are compared to provide actual impact. The qualitative and quantitative measures are defined in order to assess results. The quantitative measures taken are with respect to the functions including clinical outcome measures, clinical process measures, workflow, financial impact measures, and application reliability. The qualitative measures include satisfaction, competency and adoption, access to patient records, quality of communications, and completeness of documents (Kolker et al., 2011).

External Entities:

You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
4 sources cited in this paper
  • Chute, C. G., Beck, S. A., Fisk, T. B., & Mohr, D. N. (2010). The Enterprise Data Trust at Mayo Clinic: a semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(2), 131-135.
  • Kolker, A., & Story, P. (2011). Management Engineering for Effective Healthcare Delivery: Principles and Applications. USA: Medical Info Science Reference.
  • Mueller, P. S. (2009). Incorporating professionalism into medical education: the Mayo Clinic experience. The Keio journal of medicine, 58(3), 133-143.
  • Sawatsky, A. P., Rosenman, D. J., Merry, S. P., & McDonald, F. S. (2010, August). Eight years of the Mayo International Health Program: what an international elective adds to resident education. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings(Vol. 85, No. 8, pp. 734-741). Elsevier.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Qi Plan Part IV Implementing and Revising. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/essay/qi-plan-part-iv-implementing-and-revising-94777

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.