The construction industry is by far the most dangerous one as it takes more lives every year and results in many short and long term minor or severe injuries. The UK government regulatory bodies have been playing a significant role in ensuring that proper health and safety procedures are followed. Throughout the last four decades, its role has been impeccable in decreasing fatalities in the construction industry, although the excessive rules and regulations, frequent changes, bureaucratic structure and lack of project management and risk management techniques have dented its efficiency in protecting small construction companies and contractors, resulting in a compensation and claim culture engulfed with individual profiteers such as insurance companies, lawyers and health and safety consultants.
Health and Safety in Construction Industry
The construction industry is by far the most dangerous one as it takes more lives every year and results in many short- and long-term minor or severe injuries. The UK government regulatory bodies have been playing a significant role in ensuring that proper health and safety procedures are followed. Throughout the last four decades, its role has been impeccable in decreasing fatalities in the construction industry, although the excessive rules and regulations, frequent changes, bureaucratic structure and lack of project management and risk management techniques have dented its efficiency in protecting small construction companies and contractors, resulting in a compensation and claim culture engulfed with individual profiteers such as insurance companies, lawyers and health and safety consultants. These excessive regulations have pushed constructors to adopt some illegal practices in order to decrease cost and probability of claims from injured workers. The risk management and assessment measure provided to the constructors and other stakeholders are in development stage and a more concentrated effort is required from these regulating bodies to ensure a project management like approach is followed in public domain and private constructors.
Introduction:
Public bodies work in a certain way, a way that is different from private entities as it involves more procedures, assessments and most of the time politics that calls for a quick execution of a public project without much emphasis given to other related factors such as environment, safety or long terms usability. When assembling a building or infrastructure, public organisations besides other risk preventive initiatives, have the responsibility to ensure that risks related to health and safety are being catered to and prepared for, not only for the public but also for the civil workers. It is interesting to see that about 40% of all construction activities in the United Kingdom are undertaken by the government by outsourcing the work to private construction companies or by using the public mechanism. The role of government in reforming and rebuilding major parts of United Kingdom after World War II remains impressive although with time the industry requires more robust health and safety provisions for all involved parties. There have been major advancements in the field of constructions with new techniques and machinery, although the industry remains a dangerous one recording an average of 17 construction labourers killed every year only in public construction projects. 112 annual deaths were reported in all other industries while construction industry alone reported approx. 335 deaths in the year 2002 (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, 2012).
The industry itself has seen major turnarounds or advancements and the number of fatalities reported have reduced during the past two decades. The industry only employs 5% of total employees in United Kingdom although about 27% of total fatal injuries are still related to construction industry as reported in 2010-2011 (HSE, 2011).
Research Objectives:
In order to better understand the causes and working of public organisations in relation to health and safety, the research report aims to analyse whether the current regulations and processes in place are good enough to achieve the necessary objectives that is minimizing fatalities and injuries.
The more specific research objectives covered in this research are;
1. To ascertain whether there are deficiencies in current project management practices, or the systems used by public sector related to risk management of health and safety issues in construction industry.
2. Highlight the effects these deficiencies have on the management of health and safety risks
3. Practical suggestions for catering such deficiencies.
Research Methodology:
There are many methods available through which research can be conducted however it is important to select the one which suits best the overall requirement of the objectives.
The best and most reliable research method must be applied in this case as it is a matter of health and safety. Without the discovery of deficiencies in the current system, the research would be useless. Therefore, discovering deficiencies would require a complete research from scratch.
The method used in conducting this research is explorative study as it is the best possible research method for this situation due to the fact the current problems are not defined properly yet and a research design along with data collection is required.
Exploratory study is used for problems that have not been defined clearly which is the reason why, explorative study helps in coming up with the best research design, data collection method and also, selection of subjects related to a specific research. The study is conducted with extreme precautionary measures.
The results must be reliable and since the current system is flawed, other research methods would fail to provide reliable results as the exploration of newer methods of increasing safety is the basic requirement which can be provided by explorative study in the best possible way.
It is important that the researcher is aware of the limitations inherited with to the specific approach which is employed for the research and the relevant limitations are duly addressed during the research.
An understanding of present practices by the UK government in relation to health and safety would be achieved by exploring various government regulatory websites, peer reviewed journals and conducted studies. Furthermore specific incidents will be taken in to account for highlighting the actual negligence and flaw in current practices prevalent in the construction industry.
Through explorative study, the deficiencies in the current system can be identified as a result of which, those deficiencies would be avoided in the future.
Literature Review
Construction includes development of building projects, while building these projects the workers are susceptible to incidents resulting in minor or major injuries or even death; hence the employer tries to ensure that the adopted health and safety protocols and policies are being followed (Political Deputy, 2010).
However, a proper check and balance is required and if there are some deficiencies in the current safety regulations, they must be recognised in both project management practices and public sector's construction industries. Once the deficiencies, if there are any are highlighted, various theories on how to improve the current system and develop new regulations will come to light. Practical application of those theories/plans will then be executed after the completion of the research process. As a result, a safer working environment would be ensured to the workers and the rate of injuries and death would hopefully decrease.
The major construction endeavours in UK are carried out by government itself and since the public officials and workers are known not to work in a systematic way preferring quick execution and image enhancement over protocols and procedures. The evolution of the project management techniques organisations have learned the processes of planning, organising, managing, securing, leading and controlling resources involved in a project used efficiently and effectively to reach the goals (Lewis, 2006). The project manager leads the project and is responsible to plan and execute the activities according to the timeline/Milestones. In the project initiation phase the project manager assess the risks attached to the project and plans for mitigation or prevention to these risks. Risk assessment is then an ongoing process throughout the lifecycle of the project.
Risk Management
Risk management is the process by which an identification, assessment and prioritisation is made for a risk followed by a coordinated effort and usage of resources in order to minimise the effects of a risk and future prevention (Hubbard, 2009).
Project managers are not health and safety experts nor can they be expected to conduct a full fledged health and safety inspection, although in order to cater the risks involved with construction projects the project manager should consider and plan for health and safety risks in the project planning phase (Langdon, 2011). An effective risk communication strategy can result in enhanced worker awareness and avoid any incidents. A risk evaluation process follows that caters to stakeholder perception of the risk and acceptability. The fifth phase is the risk control phase where control options are considered along with a decision related to control strategy. Implementation stage includes execution of risk strategy and the last stage is monitoring where implementation is monitored and changes are made to ensure viability to contingencies (HSE, 2011).
In public offices there exists a certain level of bureaucracy which engenders stagnation and mistrust. This phenomenon breeds many deficiencies in the construction projects and the bureaucratic behaviour of officials keeps workers from following essential health and safety laws embedding in them a casual behaviour towards their respective jobs (Power, 2004).
Current Practices and Key Findings
The construction industry is referred to as the most dangerous occupation in the world (See Figure 1), according to Health and safety executive (HSE), 50 fatal injuries occurred during 2010 -- 2011 and it is estimated that over 5000 cancer cases will occur due to past injuries and exposure in the construction industry (Cancer Burden Study, 2010) with 36000 new cases of minor and moderate work related illnesses are reported within the construction industry. The stakeholders in construction industry range from a simple worker to a large size construction company all regulated by the government bodies, these regulations range constitute within itself all the matters related to this particular industry.
The construction industry in United Kingdom is regulated by Construction Design and Management (CDM) through its various regulations related to health and safety, CDM is a government body that regulates small and large builders along with contractors, sub-contractors, designers and workers. Another government body, Health and Safety Executive (HSE) provides meaningful resources and publications helping all the stakeholders understand their roles, rights and obligations related to health and safety in construction.
Guidelines related to health include various diseases and disorders seen in construction workers, for example the HSE provides brief guidelines over Asbestos on its website.
In April 2007 CDM announced a new set of regulations related to health and safety replacing the predecessors of 1994 and 1996. These regulations called for an overall improvement in planning and organisation of projects from the initial phase, identification of hazards early, more focused approach to health and safety with less bureaucracy. The effort made to mitigate or manage risks should be equivalent to the scope and complexity of the project with enhanced communication and training tools for the team members. Within these regulations the framework provided composed of;
HSE must be notified in case where a construction project lasts more than 30 days and involves more than 500 workers, these projects are being classified as notifiable projects.
All safety and health related precautions and risk plans must be documented in case of a notifiable project.
Provide pre-construction information to all stakeholders including risks related to health and safety.
Appointment of competent resources, with allocation of ample time to complete the project along with welfare benefits. Furthermore for notifiable project it is compulsory to appoint a CDM coordinator and a principal coordinator.
Ensure that no construction work starts before proper welfare facilities and risk documents are prepared.
Reduce risks in design phase; provide accessibility to CDM coordinator and principal coordinator.
Take account of and apply general rules of prevention while performing tasks.
A proper health and safety file should be maintained for notifiable projects including cleaning measures, maintenance, alterations, refurbishment plans with safety measures. Furthermore the scope, format and contents of the file must be agreed with the CDM coordinator.
The health and safety file must specify certain factors for better understanding and evaluation of the current system and situation:
Brief description of the work being carried out.
Brief description of underlying hazards and how they would be dealt with Brief plan having information on disposal of plants and wastage material
Key principals of construction and safety limit for work load, scaffolding and installation plan for heavy machinery
Details of hazardous materials used
Health and safety information about equipment used
The regulations promulgated by the government are farfetched and suffocating for the constructors. Daily telegraph claims that the hierarchy and systems followed by the government agencies are not democratic with less accountability and high paying jobs. Many critics see these regulatory bodies as a bureaucratic burden on businesses in shape of delays, authorizations, unnecessary health and safety checks along with soaring legal fees (Daily telegraph, 2010).
In April 2012, David Cameron criticised the HSE policies and sought to dismantle the bizarre elements of so many rules and regulations promulgating an over the top health and safety culture. He emphasised that 202 statuary laws were passed in 19th century while during the past decade more than 70 statuary laws have been passed by the HSE alone. This point to an overdone effort on the part of HSE and other regulating bodies with so many laws and guidelines one becomes hypersensitive to health and safety issues and eventually business and economy is harmed. No environment is risk free hence after providing basic guidelines and monitoring instruments adults are supposed to act responsibility in their own interests. (Mckinnon, 2012).
On a separate occasion, the prime minister declared that small businesses are bound by the red tape of health and safety and that compensation culture is destroying the economy. He went on to declare that his government would out a cap on lawyers percentage on claim received by the effected party. A positive health and safety system ensures reduction of risk and accidents but the current laws are interpreted in a complex way and media exaggerates the issues, more focus should be given to an acceptable risk management approach along without mountains of paper work, rules and regulations (Mckinnon, 2012).
Public organisations often assume the attributes of the leader, a political leader infuses his own personality in the government bodies hence government projects are usually fuelled by political objectives as a result so many projects fail or never see the implementation phase. The bureaucratic structure has inevitable inefficiencies and inflexibilities and a tendency to control all activities. The same phenomenon can be observed in the regulations promulgated by HSE and CDM, without understanding the impact on economy and the small business men they kept on introducing newer and newer regulations making the system inflexible (Jewit, 2012).
The obvious deficiencies of the framework provided by government authorities to all stakeholders in construction industry are;
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.