Verified Document

Procopius, The Secret History The Book Review

However, publishing it after his death would have undermined his authority and those that followed him. Publishing these inflammatory statements after Justinians death would help to assure that the next ruler was of higher quality than the previous one. The people would have demanded it. The political undertones of Procopius are apparent throughout the work. Conclusions and Recommendations

Procopius was careful in the military histories that preceded The Secret History to write a diplomatically correct account of the occurrences. Procopius hinted at injustices in the earlier works, but had to temper them, to do otherwise, would have been a threat to his safety, as he states in his introduction. However, one must also wonder why he decided to write The Secret History. It may be noted that The Secret History was not published until after Justinian's death (Atwater).

The author does provide clues to changing...

Considering the influences of these factions of Procopius' writing, it is recommended that the reader treat The Secret History not as a history and accurate account of the truth, but rather as a glimpse into the tensions that existed among Christians, Jews, and the Roman Empire of the time. It is a valuable historical work of the time, but not because of its accuracy of events, but because of its glimpse into the passions of the time.
Works Cited

Procopius. H.B. Dewing (Trans). Procopius: The Secret History. Loeb Classical Library. Vol. VI. 1935. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Procopius/Anecdota/home.html. Accessed 22 February 2009.

Procopius. Richard Atwater (Trans). Procopius: The Secret History. Introduction. 1927. http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/proc/shp/index.html. Accessed 22 February 2009.

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Procopius. H.B. Dewing (Trans). Procopius: The Secret History. Loeb Classical Library. Vol. VI. 1935. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Procopius/Anecdota/home.html. Accessed 22 February 2009.

Procopius. Richard Atwater (Trans). Procopius: The Secret History. Introduction. 1927. http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/proc/shp/index.html. Accessed 22 February 2009.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Procopius Precopius: The Secret History Procopius View
Words: 1049 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Procopius Precopius: The Secret History Procopius view of women in his "The Secret History" is summed up best by his own comments. Because this work totally refutes all that was written by him before about women and the rule of Emperor Justinian. Procopius wrote that he was certain that this writing would ruin his credibility as a historian and that his legacy would only be seen as fiction or prose at best

Early Medieval Western Society Byzantine Society and Islamic Society...
Words: 1485 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Medieval Western Society, Byzantine Society and Islamic Society It is the habit of history to study several cultures as if they have developed independently of one another, and entirely different. The results of national and regional pride are evident in the manner in which history is retold, as each civilization builds the future of its own region and develops its own regional differences and standards, each is often studied as

Lessons From the Han Dynasty
Words: 1966 Length: 6 Document Type: Research Paper

Han Dynasty in China The Rise and Fall of the Han Empire In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of. --Confucius The Han dynasty was one of China's longest and most powerful dynasties, spanning a period form 206 BC to 220 AD during which two dynasties were formed. The Western Han took place form 206 BC to

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now