Q1. In the United States there is a constant argument against “coddling” prisoners. This includes such “luxuries” as television and exercise/fitness programs. What are the pros and cons concerning these activities?

But there is no evidence that making prison as miserable as possible acts as a deterrent or rehabilitates prisoners. In fact, having an outlet for physical and mental energy may be useful, versus allowing such undirected energies into less fruitful channels, such as engaging in covert criminal activities within the prison. In fact, instead of merely offering access to gyms and television, an even more structured approach may be preferable. This might include access to libraries, educational programs, and rehabilitative programs such as starting a prison garden (“10 Keys, 2020). Other examples of rehabilitative work that is useful for prisoners as well as acts to restore the harm done by crime to society include participating in public beautification programs (which can teach prisoners useful skills like painting and landscaping), training guide dogs, and helping rehabilitate abused animals such as racehorses.

Most prisoners will eventually go out into the world again. The prison system is already overcrowded, and the goal should be that the prisoner never returns, but rather departs the prison with useful skills and a more positive attitude about life. A punitive attitude towards individuals behind bars is counterproductive as well as cruel. Worse conditions in prison will not create better human beings.

References

10 keys to improving conditions in overcrowded prisons. (2020). Restorative Justice. Retrieved from: http://restorativejustice.org/am-site/media/overcrowding-en.pdf