Prison Industrial Complex as Another Form of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
US sentencing policies are still lean which has led to the federal government to incarcerate so many people. There are too many criminals committing too many crimes, and this explains why we have too many prisoners. Currently, the government's prison is holding 200,000-armed robbers, 150,000 sex offenders and 100 murderers (Davis, 2008). These people are enough to make fill a city. Many people have been opposed to the idea that these people should be released form prisons. U.S. have the largest number of violent offenders despite the recorded decline in crime rate. However, the number of people sent to prison for committing violent offences has gone down during the prison boom. In 2010, over 50% of people being taken to prison were violent offenders. America has enormous prison populations because the courts are sentencing individuals who have not committed violent offences. These nonviolent crimes, in other countries, would be punished by fines, community service or would not be held as crimes. The U.S. is currently leading in the harshest form of punishment to prisoners. Research indicates that whichever the case in America's justice system, prison is the only solution (Schlosser, 2008).
Critical Discussion
The federal government has received numerous warnings and criticisms over its criminal justice system. The military industrial complex has been accused of acquisition of unjustified influence both unsought and sought. There is an increasing fear about the new threat to democracy as defense contractors, press and politicians have raised concerns over increased military spending. After declaring war on crime, the U.S. has adopted a prison industrial complex (Goldberg, 2009). This comprises a set of economic, political, and bureaucratic interests that led to increased spending on the prison industry without considering the actual need. The prison industrial complex is not based on conspiracies; it gives guidance to the country's criminal justice policy in prisons. It is created to serve some interests groups that have advocated for the unstoppable momentum gained by prisons. These groups comprise politicians both conservative and liberal who are using the concerns of crime to obtain votes.
The marginalized rural communities have become a market niche for development of prisons. Private prison companies view billions of money spent on correctional centers, not as a burden to taxpayers but an economic development. Since 2001, the rate of violent crimes has dropped by 30% while the number of inmates has gone up by sixty percent. Law experts argue that additional prisons must be created if the crime rate is increasing. Alternatively, if the rate of crime is going down, then it is because the prisons are too many. Therefore, if more prisons are created, crime rate will go down altogether (Gottschalk, 2010).
Inmates are the raw materials of the prison industrial complex: they include the homeless, the poor, drug dealers, alcoholics, drug dealers, and an array of assorted offenders. It is estimated that 70% of prisoners are uneducated. Perhaps 150,000 of this population are suffering from critical mental problems. It is believed that the mental health was responsible of handling such people and not the criminal justice system. Eighty percent of inmates have some element of substance abuse (Davis, 2008). Nonetheless, the number of drugs slotted to prisoners has been declining. Only one out of ten inmates is provided with drug treatment. Among people charged with violent times, there have been minor changes in the proportion of black American inmates. Among prisoners arrested for crime related to drugs, the population of African-Americans has tripled. Although the population of illegal use of drugs by white men is the same as among the blacks, blacks are ten times likely to be sentenced because of drug abuse. This has perpetuated to a situation whereby 50% of the inmates in U.S. prisons, are African-Americans. Two out of every five men are likely to be sentenced in the course of their lives (Guilbaud, 2010).
The prison industrial complex is a set of interest institutions and groups. In addition, it is a state of mind. The lure of financial gain has tarnished the U.S. justice system and replaced the idea of public service with the urge to obtain surplus profit. Government officials are extremely eager to pass tough laws on crime: also, they have demonstrated their lack of interest in disclosing the actual value of these laws. These have led to an array of financial improprieties (Pelaez, 2008). It is possible for the federal government to observe the internal processes of the prison industrial complex to find out when the boom began. This prison boom has succeeded in transforming the entire region's economy by allowing private prison companies...
Research Theory: Prison Industrial ComplexPrison Industrial Complex (PIC) is the term frequently used for the mass imprisonment the United States has been using over the past few decades for the control of crime and the fulfillment of personal interests of industries offering surveillance, economic and political solutions in the same matter. The recent mass incarceration of the US has dragged its people to prisons leading to an uprise in crimes
Prisons For all intents and purposes the modern history of penology -- which is to say, the science and the theory of imprisonment and the state apparatus of the penitentiary -- begins with the late 18th century British philosopher Jeremy Bentham. In Bentham's day (corresponding roughly to the time of the American and French Revolutions) there was no idea of a penitentiary per se: there was instead His Majesty's Penal Colony
Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Supreme Court has held that deliberate indifference to the substantial risk of sexual assault violates inmates' rights under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the 8th Amendment to the Constitution. In response, the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 is designed to systematically study the incidence of offender-on-offender and staff-on-offender assault in correctional facilities throughout the United States and to propose standards for preventing
Prison systems have long been a topic of debate within the realm of criminal justice. There are many opinions concerning the proper implementation and management of prison systems (King & McDermott 1995; Prison Inmates Pay for Their Upkeep 2004). The purpose of this discussion is to examine prison systems and the impact of prison systems on inmates' adjustment and behavior. Institutionalization A central point of any prison system is the level of
S. during 2004 were actually at the lowest level in over three decades (U.S.). Given the growing prison population, U.S. legal experts are urging policy-makers to reconsider current sentencing policies, in an effort to avoid expensive incarceration costs and to invest in more productive prevention and treatment approaches to crime (U.S.). Many believe that prisons and incarceration have become the panacea for all of society's ills, and where once the U.S. looked
The average felony sentence imposed upon federal and state offenders in 1996 was 62 months, or just over 5 years. On average these prisoners actually serve 45% of a state sentence for a mean prison stint of 2 years and 4 months, and 85% of a federal sentence for a stint of 4 years and 5 months. Once they are released, the recidivism rates are high. According to Lin
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now