What product price must the firm receive in order to remain in this industry in the long run?
In the long run, the firm needs to not only make a profit on each item but cover its fixed cost as well. This would be any price over and above the average total cost. So for example, at 350 workers, the firm needs to receive at least $62.14 to break even.
4) Consider a firm that has just built a plant, which cost $20,000. Each worker earns $5.00 per hour.
a)
Based on this information, fill in the table below.
Number of Worker Hours
Output
Marginal Product
Fixed
Cost
Variable
Cost
Total
Cost
Marginal
Cost
Average
Variable
Cost
Average
Total
Cost
0
0
20,000
50
8
20000
20,250
5
5
10
20000
20,500
5
5
8
20000
20,750
5
5
6
20000
21,000
5
5
4
20000
21,250
5
5
85
1900
2
20000
21,500
5
5
71.67
1950
1
20000
21,750
5
5
62.14
b)
In the example above, what price must the firm receive in order to keep producing in the short run?
The price the firm must receive in the short run is the price that covers the variable cost, so the firm must receive at least $5 per unit in the short run. In the long run, of course, the firm has to pay down the $20,000 facility.
c)
In the example above, assume that there is a maximum of 350 worker hours available (that is, there are no possibilities beyond the 350 worker hours shown in the table). What product price must the firm receive in order to remain in this industry in the long run?
In the long run, the firm needs to not only make a profit on each item but cover its fixed cost as well. This would be any price over and above the average total cost. So for example, at 350 workers, the firm needs to receive at least $62.14 to break even.
5)
A firm in an oligopolistic industry has the following demand, total cost, MR, and MC equations:
P = 600-20Q
TC = 700 + 160Q + 15Q2
MR = 600-40Q
MC = 160 + 30Q
Find:
a. quantity at which profit is maximized (Reminder: show your work).
This should be at the point where marginal revenue = marginal cost
600 -- 40Q = 160 + 30Q
440 = 70Q
Q = 6.28
b. maximum profit.
P at this level would be: 600 -- 20 (6.28) = $474.4
So profit would be Revenue -- Total cost
Revenue is 6.28(474.4) = 2979.23
Total cost at this level would be: 700 + (16)(6.28) + 15 (6.28) 2 = 1392.05
So maximum profit would e: $2,979.23 - $1,392.05 = $1,587.18
c. quantity at which revenue is maximized.
600 = 40Q
600 = 40Q
Q = 15
d. maximum revenue.
At Q = 15, P = $300
Revenue = $4,500
Note: I don't know if it's just me, but there is something wrong with this question. The equations don't make a lot of sense, such as marginal revenue declining the more you produce, so that past 15 units marginal revenue is negative. That makes no sense. You also have P, which goes below zero if you produce more than 30 units. So the answers you get don't really make a lot of sense. You can figure the math out, but I gave up trying to make sense of the actual numbers.
6)
Consider the fictitious industries depicted in the three industries shown below. For each industry, calculate the Herfindahl-Hirschman (HH) index and indicate whether or not the Department of Justice would consider it a concentrated industry.
a) Industry #1 Market Share of Each Firm:
Firm
Firm's Percent of Sales
Firm Alpha
60%
Firm Beta
10%
Firm Epsilon
10%
Firm Omega
10%
Firm Delta
10%
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for Industry #1:
Would the Justice Department consider this a concentrated industry?
Using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index formula:
.62 + 4 * .12 = 0.4
The U.S. threshold is 0.18, so yes this industry would be considered concentrated by the U.S. Department of Justice.
b) Industry #2 Market Share of Each Firm:
Firm
Firm's Percent of Sales
Verde Company
33%
Rouge Company
33%
Jaune Company
34%
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for Industry #2:
Would the Justice Department consider this a concentrated industry?
.332 * 2 + .342 = .3334
Again, this industry would be considered to be concentrated.
c) Industry #3 Market Share of Each Firm:
Firm
Firm's Percent of Sales
Felucia
10%
Cato Neimoidia
10%
Mygeeto
Problem 12-34-1. Gross margin is calculated as gross profit / revenue. Product a Product B Product C Product D Gross Margin 12,000 / 32,000 = 37.5% 17,600 / 88,000 = 20% 56,000 / 280,000 = 20% 63,000 / 144,000 = 43.75% The product that is the most profitable is Product D. 2. The best way to start this question is to figure out the price and COGS per unit for each product. For Product a, the price was $32,000 / 2900
So for the 70,000 units completed in July: (70,000)(15 + 10.65) = $1,795,500 2. The ending works in progress is 20,000. The total cost should be (20,000)(25.65) = 513,000 Note: These figures represent the total cost of the goods, not the total cost in July of the goods. The question is worded a little bit funny so I wasn't sure which one it was intended to be. Problem 14-21. Problem 14-21 1 2 3 4 DM Inv, 2010 8 8 5 2 Purchased 5 9 10 8 Used 7 11 7 3 DM Inv,
Under the first scenario, the ideal price point is only the maximum profit point for children, but it not for adults. Chapter 11, p. 449, Q2. An adverse selection problem is defined in the textbook as "a situation resulting from asymmetric information in which parties may not come to an agreement on a transaction because of distrust on the part of the party with incomplete market information…" in the scenario presented,
b) 1) ($20-$5) = $15; $1,200,000 / 15 = 80,000 units 2) if the company wants to sell just 70,000 units, then the price needs to be calculated again using the same formula as was used above: 70,000P -- (70,000*5) -- 1,200,000 = 0 70,000P = 1,550,000 P = $22.15 c) 1) This question is a bit silly. The formula would have one variable, x, to represent both the old and new sides: 19x -- 5x
The passenger miles would be (1,500,000 * 1.1) = 1,650,000. The revenue per passenger mile would be $0.20 -- (.08*.2) = $0.184 So the actual revenue was (.184)*(1,650,000) = $303,600. Now we can calculate Flex for Actual Level, the third column. This is based on the flex budget figures, which were $0.20 in revenue per passenger mile. Variable expenses were 195,000 / 1,500, 000 = $0.13 per passenger mile in the
3) to determine if the firm should increase market share by lowering the price, total revenue must be considered. At $5.00, the firm sells 17650 units for total revenue of $88,250. At $4.99, the firm sells 17,692 units for a total profit of $88,283.08. Thus, the firm gains addition revenue by lowering its price to sell more units, at least to a point. At some point, lowering the price will
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now