The discussion of the effects of smallpox, however, brings into light the fact that War and the events surrounding the War were only small part of the colonists' lives. Despite the War, the colonists had to live their daily lives and endure practical and everyday affairs such as work and disease. Fenn in her book does an excellent job of placing these factors in focus.
If there is a criticism of the book it must be in its failure to provide any new information regarding the conduct of the War itself. Although she does add smallpox to the equation she offers little beyond that fact. Like most authors, she tends to glorify the efforts of the colonists and, by doing so, fails to offer a pragmatic view of the conflict. In what could have been an interesting angle in the book Fenn briefly makes mention of the possibility that the British forces may have actually introduced smallpox into communities of colonists in an attempt to use such disease as an offensive weapon. Unfortunately, Fenn fails to build on this theory and discuss it at any length. Obviously, if this was an aspect of the British strategy it would have been an intriguing approach and offered new information relative to the conduct of the Revolutionary War. Fenn never explains whether the British actually incorporated smallpox into their military strategy
. This is a major failing in the book.
Overall, the book did a wonderful job of describing the lives of the American colonists during the Revolutionary War but, most importantly, the book reveals to a generation of Americans who have been relatively free of epidemic illnesses how disease can profoundly affect a society. Smallpox nearly single-handily destroyed the Native American cultures in America and had the potential to do the same...
In 1779 the Creeks and Cherokees in 1779 suffered tremendous population losses and were unable to resist the new U.S. federal government's political and military advances upon their land (Richter 2001). The Indians lost economic power as well, as the Crees and Assiniboines saw their control over the northern fur trade ebb away to the Hudson's Bay Company. Through New Spain, the Great Plains, Hudson's Bay, and the Pacific
Both sides took preventative measures as best they could, mainly by keeping their troops away from those afflicted with the disorder or by inoculating them. Did smallpox have the potential to affect the outcomes of campaigns or the war itself? Certainly the smallpox outbreak did indeed have the potential to affect the outcome of the war. On page 85 of his book, McCandless writes that sicknesses "…killed and incapacitated
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now