Verified Document

Positioning Stakeholder Theory Within The Research Paper

While Nohria (no date) argues that corporate governance is a hygiene factor in that its absence is a problem for companies but its presence did not correlate with improved performance, this is only for basic levels of governance. For a board to truly adopt a broad stakeholder perspective, it must be built better. Nadler (2004) argued that a well-constructed board will be one that helps to deliver superior results to the firm. Taking a broad stakeholder perspective, this means that the board should be capable of understanding the perspectives of different stakeholders rather than simply those of the shareholder. Building a board in this way, however, is constrained by the fact that the shareholders vote for the board. At times, other stakeholders may gain seats on the board (especially labor) but for the most part the shareholders dominate the board and therefore dominate the corporate interest. When Branco and Rodrigues argue in favor of a stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, they are essentially arguing for boards that are structured to the needs of multiple stakeholders. The change needs to be made at the board level, because the board hires the CEO and the CEO hires the other executives. There are logistical issues in managers applying stakeholder theory and in doing so making decisions that restrict profit from flowing to the shareholders, unless the shareholders themselves dictate these terms. It is unlikely, however, with the prominence of institutional investing that the shareholders would have any interest in anything other than rational returns.

This brings us back to the core stakeholder/shareholder debate. Branco and Rodrigues argue that only the stakeholder perspective can be relevant in any debate about CSR. The shareholder view essentially rejects any notion of a CSR debate -- there is nothing to debate as there is only one social responsibility for business. Ideally, a firm could find some common ground. The main point of common ground is when CSR issues not related...

However, such risks are difficult to quantify, which makes it difficult for management to make the case to the board that a stakeholder approach genuinely improves profits. This is the primary challenge for advocates of stakeholder theory -- the arguments have been made, now some evidence needs to be presented.
The strategic decisions that companies make always carry with them ethical consequences. Every output that a company generates has an impact on somebody or something somewhere. It is from this understanding that the stakeholder theory is derived. The challenge for management then is to find more effective ways of determining the intersection between each individual output, ethics and the bottom line. There is a price to be paid in the long-run for every activity. The stakeholder theory will be a more effective way to govern a company's CSR when the cost of all outputs is better understood.

Works Cited:

Branco, M. & Rodrigues, L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies. Vol. 12 (1) 5-15.

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved March 2, 2011 from http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html

Nadler, D. (2004). Building better boards. Harvard Business Review. In possession of the author.

Nohria, N. (no date). What really matters? Harvard Business School. Retrieved March 2, 2011 from http://info.umuc.edu/mba/HBS/realmathi/index.html

Post, J.; Preston, L. & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise. California Management Review. In possession of the author.

Smith, J. (2003). The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate. MIT Sloan Management Review. In possession of the author.

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited:

Branco, M. & Rodrigues, L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies. Vol. 12 (1) 5-15.

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved March 2, 2011 from http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html

Nadler, D. (2004). Building better boards. Harvard Business Review. In possession of the author.

Nohria, N. (no date). What really matters? Harvard Business School. Retrieved March 2, 2011 from http://info.umuc.edu/mba/HBS/realmathi/index.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Challenge of Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger...
Words: 23212 Length: 80 Document Type: Term Paper

Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger Process Review of the Relevant Literature Types of Mergers Identifying All Stakeholders in a Given Business Strategic Market Factors Driving Merger Activity Selection Process for Merger Candidates Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendations The Challenge of Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger Process Mergers and acquisitions became central features of organizational life in the last part of the 20th century, particularly as organizations seek to establish and

Comparing and Contrasting Resource-Based Strategies with Competitive...
Words: 1467 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Resource/Competitive Positioning Comparing and Contrasting Resource-Based Strategies with Competitive Positioning Strategies Resourced-Based Strategies Competitive Positioning Strategies Strategies For-Profit in the 21st Century There are two schools of thought regarding the composition of a competitive strategy. The first is resourced based. This approach identifies key resources and seeks to leverage these in order to provide value to the consumer and achieve a competitive advantage in the marketplace. The next strategy begins with identifying a niche or

Branding New Service Dominant Logic
Words: 12522 Length: 50 Document Type: Dissertation

Branding in Service Markets Amp Aim And Objectives Themes for AMP Characteristics Composing Branding Concept Branding Evolution S-D Logic and Service Markets Branding Challenges in Service Markets Considerations for Effective Service Branding Categories and Themes Branding Theory Evolution S-D Logic and Service Markets Branding Challenges in Service Markets Considerations for Effective Service Branding Branding Concept Characteristics Characteristics Composing Branding Concept Sampling of Studies Reviewed Evolution of Branding Theory Evolution of Marketing Service-Brand-Relationship-Value Triangle Brand Identity, Position & Image Just as marketing increasingly influences most aspects of the consumer's lives, brands

Marketing Principles and Practices to Organizational Goals
Words: 2567 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Marketing Principles and Practices to Organizational Goals Section 2 Creating two coherent marketing mix proposals for two marketing opportunities Section 3 Examine Strategies for Implementing Marketing Plans The intent of this analysis is to accomplish three major goals through analysis of marketing concepts and principles, illustrating them through actual examples taken from a variety of industries. The first section is focused on assessing and analyzing the contribution of marketing principles and practices

Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment in
Words: 7853 Length: 29 Document Type: Term Paper

Research Aim The purpose of this research is to investigate customer's loyalty throughout the dimensions of satisfaction, trust and commitment for mobile phone industry in Bangkok, Thailand. In addition, this research also provides practical knowledge which customers are dissimilar in satisfaction and look for different levels of relationship with mobile phones. To sum up briefly, it is completely useful for marketers to comprehend which paradigms affect customers to create good relationship

Branding Strategies Assessing the Influence
Words: 12200 Length: 44 Document Type: Research Proposal

This level of the maturity model is a transitory one and is focused more on either small, incremental gains from the first level, which is Reacting. In the Reacting layer of this proposed Branding Maturity Model, the majority of brand departments have a decidedly "every department for itself" approach to process maturity and have information flow that is purely dependent on personal productivity applications only. That is to say

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now