Political Socialization
Almost every individual in today's society has a set of political beliefs or values, but most of us hardly ever pause to think why we have such beliefs and how we have acquired them. Are they our own ideas or have we been influenced by others in our thinking? Most political scientists are of the opinion that people are not born with political ideas, nor do we manufacture them, we learn them through a process called political socialization. In this paper we shall see how this is so. In addition, we shall look at the background of political socialization, discuss its importance in today's society, identify the factors that influence the process of political socialization and evaluate their relative importance.
Background
The concept of political socialization can be traced as far back as Plato's philosophical works such as "The Republic" in which he looks for ways to develop an individual's character so that he becomes a useful member of an ideal society. Subsequent theories by philosophers of the Enlightenment era such as the Englishman John Locke reinforce the contention that human mind has no innate ideas
(i.e., people are not born with political ideas) and all our ideas come from experience (i.e., we learn our political beliefs them through political socialization). The subject of political socialization, however, is a relatively new one. It became a popular topic of interest among sociologists, psychologists, educationists and political scientists in the 1950s and research in the subject peaked in the 1960s and the 70s. Although interest in the subject continues, the enthusiasm for it has subsided to an extent with some critics dismissing the field as a "political fad." (Peng, qtd. By Simon and Merrill).
What is Political Socialization?
Political Socialization can be defined as the process through which individuals acquire the information, beliefs, attitudes and values that help them to understand the workings of a political system and as part of the process adopt some of the beliefs, attitudes and values. The term can also be describes as "a developmental process through which the citizen matures politically" (Dawson and Prewitt, p. 17) or the process by which individuals acquire their political beliefs and attitudes.
Importance
The importance of the process lies in the fact that the beliefs and the values of the people are the basis for a society's political culture and such culture defines the parameters of political life and governmental action. Since most people acquire the beliefs and attitudes of the society in which they live, the process of political socialization can also be viewed in a negative vein -- as an agent of conformity. One writer has, thus, termed the process as "facilitating the maintenance of the status quo by making people love the system under which they are born" (Sigel, 1969, p. 1). The majority of political scientists, however, view the politicization of the individual as an essentially positive process.
Whether one views the process in a negative or in a positive light, few can deny that acquiring of political beliefs that determine the direction of political and governmental action in a society is an important matter. Active participation of citizens in the polity is part of their civic duty and can only come about through
Factors Influencing Political Socialization
There are a number of factors that directly or indirectly influence our political beliefs. Our discussion of some of these factors below would explain how and why political socialization is a learning process:
1. Family
The first and foremost influence on the political orientation of a child comes from the family. Just as a young child learns to speak and interpret the language that he is exposed to at an early age (and remains most proficient at throughout his or her life) the political orientation that is acquired from one's family tends to be a great influence in all stages of one's life. How many of us born into a family of Christians or Muslims change our religion at a later stage of our lives? Very few, I suppose. Similarly the political attitudes that we learn from our family members (particularly our parents) stay with us throughout our lives. Families, then, are the primary agent in molding of our habits for life. In the field of 'political socialization,' however, some researchers have downplayed the importance of political socialization at the early stage of a child's life. For example, Neimi and Hepburn, attribute the relative diminishing of interest in political socialization after the 1970s to the "misplaced" importance accorded to research on political socialization in childhood. The authors contend: "To assume that what happened early in life was fully determinative of later thinking and behavior...
However, affirmative action does reveal a rift in American political culture. Equality has always been an endemic American value, touted in the Constitution and branded as a key feature of American life. Yet diversity has recently become a keyword in American political culture. Preserving both equality and diversity has become the most current political challenge in the United States and this challenge is encapsulated in the debate over affirmative
large number of political socialization agents for an individual, including the media, the family, and school environments. As a child I can remember one particular example that involved all of these in helping me to form a political impression. What was most vivid to me as a child, however, was the impression of complete absurdity and unreality -- although I imagine that most people who still recall the events
Political Science Inequality, Voting and American Democracy. The American political system has always prevented electoral participation by certain social groups, especially those with the fewest resources. The obstacles to participation have changed over time and today formal barriers to participation have largely disappeared. Nevertheless, voting turnout has declined over the twentieth century, and the poor and less educated continue to vote at a lower rate than those who are wealthier and
Domestically, Novosti disseminated information on life in other countries and on life in the Soviet Union. All of these institutional structures fell under the authority of the Party. The television system in the Soviet Union was centrally controlled through the State Committee for Tele- vision and Radio (Gostelradio), which coordinated the communication of the ideological message sent down from above. The reorganization and elevation of this committee to the all-union
India China Political System, Environment, Political Structure, Function The Indian political system, structure, and function is much like that of the UK, although it also resembles the U.S. In some ways. The Indian political structure has a President, typically a ceremonial role however; it much resembles the British monarch. In the role of President, the head of state advises members of the Parliament, and may serve as an advocate for the people.
A change of leadership and divisive social forces might pressure such hatreds into re-erupting, but these hatreds are still historical 'products.' A balance between history and psychology is needed to fully understand why mass political atrocities occur. A diffusion of responsibility during the action such as a war or a collective lynching can be a facilitating factor, but the social and historical context must be acknowledged. An authority that validates
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now