Verified Document

Plea Bargaining Pleading For Justice Plea Bargaining Essay

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice

Plea bargaining by its very nature implies negotiation, which in turn means that two or more parties are seeking to achieve specific goals with the cooperation of the other parties. In the absence of plea bargaining the parties would face each other in court as adversaries in front of a referee and their conduct and the trial's proceedings would be strictly controlled according to the law and judicial precedence. In contrast, plea bargaining allows the parties to be more creative when seeking their goals, but without the trappings and constitutional safety nets that a trial provides (Bowers, 2007). Plea bargaining is therefore a less formal legal proceeding that nevertheless determines the fate of the accused with respect to criminal convictions, sentencing, and fines.

The parties with a vested interest in the outcome of a criminal plea bargain are the police, accused, prosecutor, judge, and hopefully a defense attorney or public defender (Bowers, 2007). As Josh Bowers notes, past practices defines what will occur during plea bargaining and the law tends to take a backseat. This type of proceeding is therefore susceptible to individual preferences, political agendas, and institutional pressures, with the most power in the hands of police and prosecutors. A jury or bench trial, by contrast, tends to compensate for this imbalance in power by acting as a referee between the two adversaries.

If plea bargaining rarely occurred there would be little cause for concern, but 97% of all federal convictions in 2009 were the result of a plea deal (Gray, Cooper, and McAloon, 2012). This essay will examine the controversies surrounding plea bargaining and how it could be serving or subverting the goals of justice.

Political Influence

Bowers (2007) examines a phenomenon that he calls 'grassroots' plea bargaining. What this term implies is prosecutors seeking to institute a policy agenda by altering how they handle plea bargains....

The example given by Bowers involves prosecutors compensating for aggressive policing techniques in low-income, high-crime neighborhoods through the use of lenient plea deals. Aggressive policing tends to capture the children and spouses of residents in its dragnet, but higher arrests rates also risks alienating local support for aggressive policing tactics. Instituting a policy of more lenient plea deals is one way policymakers can attempt to appease residents.
On the surface, the use of more lenient plea deals to appease residents seems to be a humane response to aggressive policing of crime-ridden neighborhoods, but Bowers (2007) notes that the information gathered during the booking process generates a database that can be used by the police to keep tabs on the residents. What the residents are unwittingly losing is their privacy as a police state is formed in their neighborhood; a police state made possible in part by a promise of lenient plea deals.

The Currency of Plea Bargaining

The accused and prosecutors during plea bargaining are seeking specific goals. The accused is seeking to reduce the criminal charge, probation in lieu of prison time, or a reduced sentence, while the prosecutor is trying to lower their own case loads, close police investigations, reduce court costs, and create a public reputation of prosecutorial efficiency (Bowers, 2007). Plea bargaining also eliminates the costs of a trial for both the defendant and the state.

Talia Fisher (2007) refers to these different goals as 'bargaining chips' that can be used by each party to achieve their ends. For example, the accused can choose to relinquish their constitutional rights to self-incrimination, a jury trial, and the appellate process in exchange for reduction of a felony conviction to a misdemeanor, reduced sentence, or probation in lieu of jail time. Fisher describes the plea bargaining process as conferring to the accused a significant amount of autonomy, but the threat of spending the…

Sources used in this document:
References

Bowers, Josh. (2007). Grassroots plea bargaining. Marquette Law Review, 91, 85-121.

Fisher, Talia. (2007). The boundaries of plea bargaining: Negotiating the standard of proof. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97(4), 943-108.

Gray, David, Cooper, Meagan, and McAloon, David. (2012). The Supreme Court's contemporary Silver Platter Doctrine. Texas Law Review, 91(1), 7-47.

Kassin, Saul M. (2012, Apr. 30). Why confessions trump innocence. American Psychologist, 1-15.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Plea Bargaining, Otherwise Known As:
Words: 3023 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Proposal

" This means that, "It is an indictment of the criminal justice system, not plea bargaining itself" (Sandefur, 2003, p. 31). The Constitution incorporated the right to a trial into the process, and it does not necessarily entail that: the defendant needs to know his rights in waiving them or hiring a legal counsel to help. Sandefur finally stated that, "Plea bargaining is not perfect, but its problems are procedures

Plea Bargaining and Crime
Words: 909 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Many criminal cases are often resolved out of court through agreement between the aggrieved party and the offender. The process of achieving such a settlement is referred to as Plea Bargain in law. It is a practice that is used in many jurisdictions to resolve cases. Either of the sides in the case may initiate the Plea bargain process. Both sides have to agree before such a process succeeds

Plea Bargaining in the United States
Words: 1906 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Benefits From Plea Bargaining? Although the U.S. Constitution guarantees all defendants a trial by jury, individuals entering the criminal justice system today have about a one-in-twenty chance of actually undergoing a trial, with the rest of the cases being plea bargained away. While this approach facilitates the disposition of cases in already overbooked courtrooms, plea bargaining has been the source of a growing amount of criticism as a result of

Police Abuse Problems With Guilty Pleas
Words: 661 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Police Abuse/Problems with Guilty Pleas Police Abuse From time to time, the media highlights stories about police abuse that can best be described as disturbing. It is unfortunate that some police officers do turn against the same people they have sworn to keep safe. Indeed, most victims of police brutality are left feeling frightened, betrayed and helpless. Further, police abuse triggers a cycle of mistrust in which case the community gradually loses

Criminal Procedure: The Criminal Justice
Words: 1602 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

D.). Armed robbery is an offense carried out while in possession of a drawn weapon like gun despite of whether it was fired or not. Plea negotiation or bargaining is usually conducted in order to lessen trial expense and involves the provision of a lesser sentence by the prosecutor in exchange for admission of guilt. Pre-trial conference involves discussions between the defense, prosecutor, and judge to ascertain the need for

Race and the Criminal Justice System
Words: 1024 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Plea Bargaining and the For Profit Prison Industrial Complex Any discussion of systemic racism in America would be incomplete without mentioning how race impacts the criminal justice system. It should not be surprising to anyone to hear that the black population is overrepresented in the what Angela Davis has termed the prison industrial complex (Lentin, 2020). 37% of America’s prison population is black, yet blacks are only 12% of the total

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now