Before the war, interactions and romantic interludes between Jew and Caucasian were no problem. During the war, however, Jews were marginalized to the point where they were no longer recognized as human beings. This is symbolized by the harsh treatment of an old Jewish man by a Nazi soldier, also during the beginning scenes. The man is ordered to walk away from the sidewalk and into the gutter, where he steps into water. This contrasts with the pleasure that Szpilman and the blonde derives from their interaction. Visually, the contrast between the Jews and Germans is symbolically depicted by the physical differences between Szpilman and the girl, which would become symbolic not only of ethnic differences, but also of the way in which these differences are used to justify the death of hundreds of thousands of Jews.
The visual depiction of the interaction between Szpilman and the girl is brightly colored. They accompany each other on their way through town. The innocence and enjoyment of this excursion is contrasted by the dark social realities that are related with the bombings at the beginning of the film: the sign "No Jews" thoroughly ruin Szpilman's first date: he cannot take her to a restaurant, to a park, or even to sit on a bench, because everything has been reserved to exclude Jews. This is symbolic of the ultimate ruination of lives that becomes the theme of the film.
Most poignantly, music and its potential salvation is symbolized by the instruments in Szpilman's home. When he reaches his family, they are relieved to see him. The atmosphere is frantic, busy and almost excited when he arrives. This is however soon darkened by the reality of their situation. Throughout the ordeal, the audience is impressed with the sense of the family unit between Szpilman, his siblings and his parents. This, like the peace, is also soon shattered by the realities of the war. The violin and the piano symbolize potential salvation. Initially, it is suggested that the family hide the excess of their already dwindling funds in the violin so that the Nazis cannot confiscate it, while the piano is sold in order to keep food on the family's table.
Despite this, there is soon too little money left to buy anything, and the progressive poverty of the family is symbolized by the decreasing amounts of money available: 5,000 zlotys become the 20 left in the mother's purse and then the 3 that could be obtained for the novel, the Idiot. Music was unable to provide the family with financial security or salvation. This however both contrasts with and foreshadows the later salvation that Szpilman would obtain from his music. It is an inner salvation that perpetuates itself by being shared.
The various contrasts of visual presentation and sound also depicts the war not only between the main parties at opposite sides of the political spectrum, but also within each character's heart. The Nazi for example could sympathize with the Jew, while the Jew in desperation for survival may ultimately join the Nazis against his own people. It is a continual dynamic of backstabbing and heroism, with human motive and desire underlying politics.
Historical Authenticity
Roman Polanski has made the film with extreme attention to detail. Having been part of the events himself, the audience is impressed with the authenticity not only of the events, but also of the set and surroundings. Indeed, it is unlikely that authors on the subject could disagree on the point of historical authenticity of the physical surroundings. This was enhanced by the work of professionals such as the designer Allan Starski and the costume designer Ann Sheppard. Both were previously involved in films of this, with distinguished works such as Schindler's List and the Insider on their profiles. This talent combines with Polanski's passion for the perfection of detail in his work (Lownes).
Petrakis does however suggest that the use of a single character's viewpoint to depict the entire story might act as a limiting factor within the film. The events are seen and experienced solely through the eyes of the Pianist, the Jew who often survives on the basis of no more than luck. As such, Petrakis believes that true objectivity...
Pianist directed by Roman Polanski. Specifically, it will imagine every part of "The Pianist" that was violent or contained swear words was simply removed from the film. Censorship in film has always been a contentious issue, and with the advent of Clean Flix, the situation has come to a head. While it is certainly a person's right to view entertainment that they do not feel is offensive, for a
.. is, in the end, a sign of its odd sense of mastery. The technical advancements of the film... are unimpeachable and strangely casual" (45). As we learn from Corso, the quest for information leaves us wondering as the final scene in the Ninth Gate does. Polanski pays special attention to objects, particularly hands, to emphasize their importance. In the Pianist, Szpilman's hands open and close the film, indicating their value
The noise alerts the neighbor woman who demands his identity papers and threatens to call the police. Her hatred for the man is based solely on the fact he is Jewish. There is a famous experiment done by Jane Elliot (1970), an elementary school teacher, which demonstrates how quickly people will adopt a belief in their own superiority. In the experiment Elliot tells the children that blue eyed people are
Chinatown and The Pianist both exemplify Roman Polanski’s directorial style. However, they are vastly different films. An exploration of each, in comparison with one another, illustrates Polanski’s predilections as a filmmaker and possible also as an auteur. The 1974 film Chinatown bears a dark and gritty stamp that exemplifies in many ways the zeitgeist of the era. Building on the tradition of film noir and its romantic depictions of criminal
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now