Verified Document

Philosophies Of Religion Generally Fall Term Paper

Nevertheless, personal experience is a powerful method of argument, especially when the credibility of the individual is not called into question. The moral argument in favor of the existence of God is weak because the existence of human morality does not in itself mean that God is the origin of morals. Rather, God has often been used as a motive to prompt people to act a certain way, according to religious scripture or doctrine. Miracles pose a significant problem for the philosopher of religion, because if an act is deemed miraculous, it supercedes the laws of nature. However, the laws of nature are always subject to God; therefore, a miracle cannot theoretically exist. Pascal's "wager" is yet another theistic philosophy of religion, one that is based primarily on self-interest. Pascal suggested that believing in God is a "better bet" than not believing in God. The individual who believes has nothing to lose and everything to gain, whereas the non-believer could stake his soul on a simple philosophical principle. Pascal's wager is weak in that it offers no proof of the existence of God. Like many theistic arguments, Pascal's wager relies heavily on a Christian concept of God and of Heaven and Hell.

Atheistic arguments can be as logically weak as their theistic counterparts. For instance, placing the entire burden of proof on the theist is akin to...

Nevertheless, without the burden of proof people could claim the existence of all sorts of phantasmagoric creatures like unicorns. Therefore, the atheist makes a sound claim with this "primary presumption." Atheists also point out that many arguments in favor of God are contradictory. For example, God is presented as a perfect and benevolent being. Yet the world is ripe with imperfection and evil. Similarly, God is usually defined as being omniscient and omnipotent. Yet human beings clearly have free will. Religions have presented many means of navigating through these conflicts, but no counterargument is eminently successful.
All philosophies of religion have strengths and weaknesses. Some are more personally appealing than others. A thorough examination of all the major theistic and atheistic arguments only proves the difficulty of proving the existence or non-existence of God. Moreover, most of the aforementioned arguments suppose a certain definition of God, endowing God with a set of human-imposed qualities. It is entirely possible, for instance, that God is causeless and neutral, even imperfect. While none of the arguments persuade me to personally take up their cause, I cannot help but appreciate the blank assertion by the atheist that the burden of proof will always rest with the philosopher who tries to prove the existence of God.

Works Cited

Holt, Tim. "Arguments for Atheism." Philosophy of Religion.info. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/atheisticproofs.html.

Holt, Tim. "Arguments for the Existence of God." Philosophy of Religion.info. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/theisticproofs.html.

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Holt, Tim. "Arguments for Atheism." Philosophy of Religion.info. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/atheisticproofs.html.

Holt, Tim. "Arguments for the Existence of God." Philosophy of Religion.info. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/theisticproofs.html.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Religion in the Leviathan the
Words: 968 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

" (Leviathan, Chapter 12). This passage speaks directly to man's relationship with God in Hobbes' eyes. The idea that God exists pre-logic erupts into an understanding that faith and fate play such an integral role in Man's life. Whatever we may do to secure our happiness we may do, but fate and faith play a larger role than we would generally care to admit to be the case. In general, Hobbes philosophy

Religion Before I Started This
Words: 575 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Divine Command Theory is the ethical theory that says that what God wills or command determines the moral status of various actions, or in other words, "an act is right if and only if God wills or commands it...an act is wrong if and only if God forbids it" (Religion pp). Yet, this simply states what people are supposed to do, and does not take into account free will and

Comparative Philosophy
Words: 3983 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

Philosophy Nietzsche often identified life itself with "will to power," that is, with an instinct for growth and durability. This concept provides yet another way of interpreting the ascetic ideal, since it is Nietzsche's contention "that all the supreme values of mankind lack this will -- that values which are symptomatic of decline, nihilistic values, are lording it under the holiest names" (Kaufmann 1959). Thus, traditional philosophy, religion, and morality

How Does Philosophy Relate to Biblical Studies
Words: 2773 Length: 9 Document Type: Research Paper

Introduction Historically, Biblical theology and philosophy had so many things in common and thus complemented each other. Philosophers and theologians even considered themselves mortal enemies in certain cases. Most Christianity doctrines have critical implications or pre-suppositions on philosophy. The discussion begins with the relationship between philosophy and Christianity. It then defined Biblical Theology based on three Christian doctrines that influence philosophy. They include the trinity, the atonement and the incarnation. The

Fall Camus's Story, the Fall
Words: 2138 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

.. Anyone who has considerably meditated on man, by profession or vocation, is led to feel nostalgia for the primates. They at least don't have any ulterior motives." (Camus, 4) Passion as well might make one authentic, or a true and mindless embrace of any aspect of life. Truthfully, the story does little to present us with true authenticity, because the narrator himself never discovers it. The meaning of this story

Philosophy of Science
Words: 2868 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

Scientific Explanation Must every scientific explanation contain a law of nature? For those who support the Deductive-Nomological Account, the answer is yes. Discuss critically the arguments for and against this view, and present your own analysis of which is stronger. Date of Submittal Must every scientific explanation contain a law of nature? For those who support the Deductive-Nomological Account, the answer is yes. Discuss critically the arguments for and against this view, and

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now