Personality and Personalistic Leadership: An Assessment of Team Management for the 21st Century Business Team Environment
Contemporary studies on emerging new principles on the nature of the culture of the business environment and team management within organizations led to the development of what is termed as "personalistic leadership." This new term and concept refers to the prevailing use of personal relations and strategies that aim to build stronger social bonds between leader and members, as well as among members of an organization. Personalistic leadership arises from the development of diversity among members of an organization; it is in this change in the business environment that made personal and social relationships important within business organizations (Buhler, 2004). In this kind of leadership, it is also vital that leaders/managers must be able to adapt strategies and methods which reflect the flexibility or adaptability of the leader to changes within the business environment and among its members. In addition to flexibility, a leader / manager should, however, "adopt" specific standards that will guide him/her in accomplishing the task of team-building and management (Weiss, 2004).
Organization members, on the other hand, must also meet specific criteria in order to become part of a diverse and dynamic organization and business environment. Just as leaders must learn to subsist to a personalistic style of leadership, members must also be able to have the flexibility and adaptability in order to relate with other members. Thus, personality is an essential factor that must be considered in order to ensure 'synergy' within an organization -- that is, a diverse and dynamic business environment brought about by various personalities of its members.
Personality is considered an essential factor needed by a group or team for it to become effective; consequently, it also contributes to team success. The role of personality...
Those officials who did look at the question of Japanese intentions decided that Japan would never attack, because to do so would be irrational. Yet what might seem irrational to one country may seem perfectly logical to another country that has different goals, values, and traditions. (Kessler 98) The failures apparent in the onset of World War II and during the course of the war led indirectly to the creation
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now