Here, Russell espouses a Platonic episteme by enunciating the expectations of behavior between different classes. While Plato philosophized that persons are born with the characteristics fitting of their caste, Russell envisages a society in which "ordinary" men and women are expected to be collectivized and, therefore, devoid of individual expression.
Jean Jacques Rousseau paid his respects to the philosophy of Plato, although he thought it impractical, citing the decayed state of society. This sort of romanticism has been downplayed by the modern scientific establishment, who denounce the noble savage theory of human nature. Humans are not born purely good, modern science maintains. Instead, evolutionary traits are promoted at the biological level, thereby giving rise to how people are. It is not society that corrupts, but rather an interrelationship between human tendencies and society's condition that creates a modern individual fit for modern society. The virgin person is not all good, and society is not all evil. (8)
Rousseau's philosophy of human development was also different from Plato's, for Plato believed that people are born with skills appropriate to certain castes, whereas Rousseau held that there was a developmental process relatively similar to all humans, while maintaining room in his philosophy for the reality of an innate human nature. In his book Emile, Rousseau wrote that children are perfectly designed organisms, with predispositions to learn from their environments. Corrupt society, Rousseau posited, was a malign influence on the children. Therefore, rarely did they grow into virtuous adults. Rousseau's educational philosophy consisted of removing the child from corrupt society and conditioning him through tasks and traps in the new environment. This response-based learning theory was reinforced at the end of the nineteenth century with conditioning experiments, the most famous carried out by Ivan Pavlov in Russia.
Rousseau advocated truth in teaching. He instructed that adults always be honest about the legitimacy of their teaching positions, their authority deriving from physical coercion: "I'm bigger than you." He thought of the age of twelve as the age of reasons, where after children would engage life as free individuals.
John Locke, on the other hand, posited a blank slate of mind, or an empty mind, on which experience works to shape or mold ways of being. In Locke's views, sensations and reflections are the two sources of all our ideas. Many modern psychologists contradict Locke, arguing that evolutionary conditions have shaped men's predispositions and, consequently, dispositions. (9) Much of this recent science also goes against Rousseau's intuition that men are born noble, but corrupted by society. Psychologist Steven Pinker cites "the fear of inequality" as a reason for people's attitude against his argument for human nature. Much education today, in fact, does treat the student as equal to all other students, though in Pinker's argument humans are born with unique affectations. Pinker associates equality with sameness, arguing that theories for innate human nature promote the necessity of harboring individual qualities in children from their earliest of days. (10)
Teaching is a practical endeavor. It is crucial to take into consideration all the knowledge bequeathed unto us from our predecessors, for past experiences...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now