Are online courses or in-person courses better for students? Pick a side, and your thesis will assert your position.
The concept of higher education and its relevance to a changing economic climate has become a very contentious issue. Americans acknowledge the need for large investments in education are even willing to fund them with higher taxes. Research has indicated that Americans value education and a commitment to it highly. For example, a recent survey from New America, a Washington think tank, show that 75% of Americans believe its easier to be successful with a degree than without one. In addition, these same respondents were willing to accept a 10% rise in taxes to help fund lower higher education tuition costs. The overall need for higher education is also becoming apparent. The United States economy is shifting to a service-oriented approach predicated on skills in math, science, technology, and engineering. These high skilled jobs often require a higher-level education than prior generations. Although the overall need for education has been recognized consistently through generations, the format in which education is provide has changed dramatically. Gone is the need for in person classrooms and the associated overhead that comes with providing these services. This concept has been replaced with more innovative and nimble online channels which look to lower costs while also eliminating many of the overhead and administrative costs associated with traditional in person education. Online courses often dont provide the lavish gym, or the large football stadium or concert hall. Instead, online course often focus primarily on education will eliminating many of the other ancillary elements on in-person training. As a result, a litany of low-cost higher education courses has emerged, many of which offer course online exclusively. Although this is welcomed edition to the education industry, I believe students are better served by taking in-person courses. First, in person courses allows students to interact with other diverse student groups to build long lasting relationships. These connections and relationship will be particularly important in the future as students begin to matriculate into their respective careers. Having these connections can help foster future career growth opportunities. In-person classes help instill an element of discipline and accountability within the student. The ability to arrive to class on time and prepare for it helps to instill critical habits and soft skills that will be needed after graduation. In addition, in-person courses help mitigate the negative influences of online course such as procrastination. Finally, in certain instances online courses provide poor quality education and often have instructors who many not be accomplished instructors. In some instances, these institutions are not interest in student outcomes but only student enrollment. Having an in-person classroom setting allows for students to be more active and engaged in their learning (Bowen, 2014).
To begin, for online or remote learning courses to be effective, the content must be very compelling and delivered in a very high standard. Physical course offerings at public universities have an extensive track record of delivering a high value learning experience formed over hundred of years of education. The online industry, in general...
Research has shown that the best outcomes occur with a combination of both online and in person classroom experiences. This method provides the benefits of both mediums while also limiting the negative elements. For example, research has shown that students with a combination of on-line and in person classes have higher granulation rates. In the case of community college students, they are less likely to drop out and much more like to enroll in a four-year university after receiving their associates degree (SITE). More specifically, the estimated odds of dropping out were 17.9% lower for community college students who enrolled in some online courses, and the estimated odds of obtaining an associate degree were 28.8% higher for those same students (Ortagus, 2020). The research indicates that students are most successful when they use online courses to supplement their education as oppose to simply relying solely on online education. As such, a combination of online and in-person classes is the best solution as it eliminates the principle-agent problem of online only universities who are only looking to funnel students without providing services to support them. However, it does allow for the flexibility and convenience of online courses particularly for those will large…
References
1. Bowen, W. G. (2014). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press2. Cheslock, J., Ortagus, J., Umbricht, M., & Wymore, J. (2016). The Cost of Producing Higher Education: An exploration of theory, evidence, and institutional policy. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 31). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
3. Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2013). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763-784; Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659.
4. Ortagus, J., & Derreth, R.T. (2020). “Like having a tiger by the tail”: A qualitative analysis of the provision of online education in higher education. Teachers College Record, 122(2)
Higher Education Investment in Higher Education The literacy rate is one of the important indicators of a developed country hence governments focus on enhancing its infrastructure. There are many challenges to promote higher education as demographic and social factors act as barriers to admission for many candidates. The effect of these factors should be explored so that the negative outcomes can be controlled. Investment in Higher Education Formal education system is considered as one
Congress did more than just reauthorize the Act, though. It also required that state agencies be established that would be able to handle some of the work that accrediting agencies were once expected to do on their own (Crow, 2009). By doing that, it was assumed accreditation would be easy to attain for deserving schools, and the value of being accredited would be seen once again (Crow, 2009). It became
Higher Education 1970 -- 2000 Between 1970 and 2000, many changes took place in higher education. One of the largest ones was among the student population. Many more women started going to college, in some fields eclipsing the men who were attending classes for a better education and a more fulfilling career (Commission, 2006). That was not the only issue where the student body was concerned, though. Another large change was
Higher Education Leadership Purpose Statement The purpose of higher education leadership is to ensure organizational learning through the induction of most qualified men and women in educational institutions, at the same time keeping pace with rapidly changing educational standards by applying modern teaching and research methodologies, to embrace flexibility and creativity in virtual learning of diversified workforce across the globe. Higher education leadership aims to win the commitment and loyalty of
Auto loans, credit card loans, and mortgages have all declined. Another issue plaguing higher education is how to curtail of abates the influence of these rising costs on the lives of their students. Many of these costs are indirectly correlated to tuition and are therefore uncontrollable in a market subsidized by government. However, many issues are directly related to the tuition, and are therefore controllable. These include student demographics, institution
Much like the argument of Carnoy (2005), Singh asserts the huge importance of education in a globalized structure. This article also resonates the disagreements of Carnoy (2005) and Kwiek (2001) -- i.e. The positive and negative effects of globalization in higher education with the author taking the side of Carnoy in the belief that higher education positively implicates a nation's economy. Unlike McPherson & Schapiro (2002), who argued against privatization
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now