Research Paper Undergraduate 448 words

Performance Reviews How Is Performance

Last reviewed: January 27, 2007 ~3 min read

Performance Reviews

How is performance appraisals conducted in this organization?

Microsoft uses a rating system to rank its employees within work teams when conducting performance appraisals. According to one Microsoft employee's blog on the performance appraisal process, Microsoft grades or ranks all of its employees on a curve. "Your rating is based on your ladder level expectations and relative to the performance of your peer group...Woe unto you if you're a super-star in a super-super-star peer group" ("Microsoft's 3.0 (or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Curve," 2005, Mini-Microsoft Blog) in other words, employees are not simply evaluated on an individual basis, they are also ranked in relation to their peers, which means that even an excellent employee might receive an average performance rating, if he or she is working with the top talent at the company on a competitive work team

What advice would you provide senior management in the organization about how to conduct performance appraisals?

This particular disgruntled Microsoft employee suggested in his blog: "I have recently been thinking it might be interesting to score teams on their effectiveness as a whole. If we did team reviews as well as individual reviews, and team scores affected rewards, managers would really scramble to get low performers off their teams." ("Microsoft's 3.0 (or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Curve," 2005, Mini-Microsoft Blog) in other words, to create better team cohesiveness, rank the team, not the members of the team in relation to other team members. Do not penalize strong performers for being members of strong teams. Lackluster employees would be penalized because no one would want them on their 'team.' Now, there is an incentive to work with weak employees, to boost one's own relative performance rating. This idea seems strong, and although it world reduce competition on work teams, as there would be less jockeying for power and the chance to win the highest team ranking, on the other hand, such a system would seem to be more in keeping with Microsoft's emphasis on company cohesiveness, a company committed to driving its mission of innovation forward and boasts that its greatest reward is allowing its employees to work together "with great people," and have an impact" as a member of a team not merely as an individual ("Employee Profile: David -- HR General Manager," 2006, Careers -- United States Microsoft Website).

You’re 100% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2007). Performance Reviews How Is Performance. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/essay/performance-reviews-how-is-performance-40392

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.