The American corporations that move into those areas control what food is eaten as well as grown there, and the conglomerates in the media bury most of the native culture of these other places under a strong onslaught full of American entertainment.
The authors, Sardar and Davies, address all of these issues with insight and research. The chapters in which they address culture very strongly, however, become somewhat repetitive and almost whiny on occasion. However, the authors are not saying that everyone has to agree with everything that they say. Even without agreeing with them completely, it is very easy to see that there are good reasons why many people do not like America, despite the fact that a lot of other people do like the country and what it stands for.
For those people who love to 'bash' the United States, this book will quite likely be exactly what they are looking for. Some see the book as being only a rant against everything that most Americans hold dear, such as the television news media, capitalism, movies, McDonald's, the military, and countless other 'American' things. For those that love America, this book might be a bit harder to take. There are many people who believe that their country is perfect, and they turn a blind eye to anything that would indicate otherwise. This book must be read with an open mind if it is to be understood and valued for what it is.
For those that hate America, this book will likely make them hate it all the more. For those that love America and are very devoted to their country, there is little that could be said to change their minds, regardless of the facts and regardless of the persuasiveness of the argument that was made. There are many that still feel as though America is hated because it is powerful and rich, and other countries are not. People in many other countries live under the misguided opinion that all people in America are rich and can buy everything that they want and need. They fail to understand that there are poor people in every country, no matter what the government is like or how wonderful everything in that country seems to be.
Another argument against this type of book is that other countries do not like America because they cannot be like America. In other words they assume that, because all Americans are rich and powerful and buy whatever they want, they should be jealous of America. The government in America, because it is rich and powerful, often intimidates people and sometimes resorts to simply using brute force so that it can accomplish whatever it feels that it wants to do. Other countries wish that they could do that as well, and so that hate America out of a misguided sense of jealousy and resentment.
Those that believe in this argument would state that socialist countries are socialist because they have failed at capitalism, but yet they do not blame themselves. Instead, they blame America. They turn the idea of success into evidence of a crime and the idea of failure into a proof of virtue. The see that, because America is rich, the rest of the world must be poor, and that there would not be violence in the world if the American military would simply stop meddling in the affairs of other countries.
People that live in other countries, such as Korea for example, see America much differently than Americans do. In 1945, Korea was a colony of Japan, and the atomic bombs that America dropped made it into a free country, but only through brute force. Prior to that year, Japan required that Koreans change their names to Japanese names, stop using the Korean language, and require their young women to provide sexual services for the Japanese military. Today, America is both loved and hated by the Korean people. The reasons behind this are complex, though, and cannot simply be explained because of the bombings that took place many years ago.
It is also pointed out that the hatred that many people in other countries feel for America is not new, and in many cases it is not without some merit. The question, though, is whether books such as this one lend anything new to the argument of why America is hated by others and whether anything can - and ever will - be done to change that. Since...
Most American people are not actually doing this, however. Instead, it is mostly the corporations and large companies that are found throughout America. They work their way into other countries as well, and then they 'Americanize' them. While some countries tolerate this, and there are developing countries that are grateful for what America has done for them, most countries do not want others coming in and trying to change
Prior to their narrative on Townsend, King Solomon is described as a powerful man with grace and humility in his heart. God is said to have appeared to King Solomon in a dream, and asked him what he (Solomon) wanted to be given. Now Solomon could well have asked for some glittering gifts and for more power. But he didn't; he asked for "wisdom," the authors explain. "I am only
On the other hand there is a growing consensus that these reasons do not fully explain the failure to deal with a problem like the Holocaust when the dimensions of the situation were known at a relatively early stage. The weight of the argument would the therefore be inclined towards critics such as Wyman who see political reasons for this lack of action based on anti-Semitic sentiment in the county
criminal transgressions that are selected in hate crime laws contain, but are not restricted to, delinquencies against persons like aggravation, terroristic coercions, assault and criminalities against possessions or property like criminal trespass, criminal disruption and incendiarism. It may also comprise of defacement causing destruction to a church, synagogue, graveyard, morgue, and honoring to the dead, school, educational institution, other public buildings, courthouse, or any personal property situated within such
C. By Michael Shively (June, 2005), the first hate crime laws were enacted during the sixties, seventies, and eighties. The first states to pass hate crime legislation were Oregon and Washington in 1981. The first federal hate crime legislation, Shively explains, was debated in 1985, and the first federal statute related to hate crimes was the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, passed in 1990. Subsequent to that Act, other pieces of
Hate Crime Enhancements -- Two Sides of the Argument This project represents the evolution of opinion as a function of the process of a strictly academic exercise. At the outset of the project, the writer maintained a specific belief: namely, that hate crime enhancement policies are fundamentally unjustified. It was the process of formulating a counterargument to the writer's position that ultimately resulted in a change of opinion. The writer is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now