Another mom who is managing a child with a peanut allergy stresses the two hardest things about having a child with this condition:
What has been the hardest part about dealing with your child's peanut allergy for you? / Two things. First: Trust. Trusting that whoever is watching your child (be it at daycare or school or babysitting) REALLY understands the ramifications of her allergy. It doesn't matter if it's family or not, it's hard to trust another person with your child's care when they have a special need like this. I'm not worried about my daughter eating peanuts or peanut butter directly. I AM worried about her trusting an adult who doesn't know how to read a label (or won't bother to). / Second: Mortality. There's nothing more sobering than facing your child's mortality at an early age. Sure most parents deal with general fears about their kids getting hit by a car or talking to strangers. But having a child with a food allergy that involves anaphylaxis makes you think about your child dying. Alot. It isn't fun. (Peterson)
Fundamental education regarding the seriousness of food borne allergies is an essential aspect of helping individuals with allergies and other stakeholders appropriately deal with food borne allergies, especially when the allergens are exceedingly common, like in the case of peanuts. Full parental and caregiver education about the seriousness of the disorder is also something that still seems to be lacking. (Smith) (Peterson)
Broad Education is the Key
Individuals frequently report the feeling that the condition was downplayed or not given significant time and attention when diagnosis was made and achieving the point of diagnosis was not always easy either, as often with children exposures are not always so clear and allergy testing might not be seen as an option of first resort. With serious allergies it is also considered difficult to test as skin prick test are the safest method but a less safe less controlled option, food challenge testing might be seen as a better option for a child because of the traumatic nature of the prick testing, but this may not really be the case. Food challenges are commonly suggested in literature and elsewhere when food allergies are suspected as the cause of certain symptoms, and yet with the seriousness of single exposures to some food allergies at home, ad hoc and difficult food challenge testing can be very dangerous. A brief explanation of each type of test is needed:
Prick test; is a topical testing process where a long list of potential allergens are topically applied to the skin with a minor abrasion or even a very small needle, in a recorded patterned grid, usually on a person's forearm, though testing can be conducted elsewhere. The exposure of a minimal amount of the allergen is then reviewed by looking at the skin reaction and judging it by a predetermined scale of reaction seriousness. The test is then recorded and allergens are identified. Usually such tests are relatively conclusive and albeit minor can seem seriously traumatic for a child, but as has been stated they are done in a controlled environment with trained medical staff present. (Sicherer, Munoz-Furlong and Sampson) (O'B Hourihane, Dean and Warner)
Food challenge test; usually takes place over a longer period of time, and is often administered at home. The food challenge consists of exposing the child to a single new food for a set period of time, isolating new foods from others that have not yet been tested and when one produces symptoms of allergy removing it from the child's diet. The record keeping can be minimal and the length of the testing can vary, as can the exposure of the child to other exacerbating allergens during the test phase, which completely challenges the observer and can of course be dangerous as single exposures by people with serious food borne allergies can cause breathing related reactions. (Sicherer, Munoz-Furlong and Sampson)
Finally, a child may simply be diagnosed with a food born allergy after a known exposure that has caused a mild to serious allergic reaction, but especially if such a reaction is indicative of the type of reaction that can progress to anaphylaxis, head and/or neck swelling or any trouble breathing. All of these diagnostic options are likely to elicit some data that will help in the diagnosis but either can be potentially dangerous and could also produce inconclusive results. The protocol of pediatric and emergency physicians has swayed in the direction of administering (or prescribing) epinephrine, and asking questions...
Child Observation Term: Winter, 2014 John Age of Child: 6 years old Date of Observation: February 3, 2014 Time of Observation: 9:00 to 10:00 Place of Observation: Child Care Center Other People Present in the Observation Setting: 1 teacher, 1 assistants, 15 other children Development: Appears mostly normal; has some problems with fine motor skills and challenging cognitive skills. Permission: Permission was granted by the Director of the Child Care Center, the child's teacher and his parents John was observed
The game further progressed to shooting each other off the top of the jeep with their fingers as they yelled "bang" This game certainly showed some of the more aggressive sides of all the boys. The fact that the boys stuck with it and turned it into a more violent game would indicate some issues of gender difference as well. The game continued to evolve until another boy got knocked
Parents, of course, will each raise their children a certain way, based on what they believe to be right and wrong. By observing a child at play, it is sometimes possible to get an idea of the parenting styles of that child's mother and/or father. For the child observed by this paper, there was the possibility that she had been the product of a particular kind of raising. Her
Child Observation (Deviant Behavior) Labeling Theory and Deviant Behavior In his book "Studies in the Sociology of Deviance," Howard Becker takes an unconventional approach to the concept of social deviance. Becker discusses the labeling theory in detail, giving examples of people whose behavior is deviant simply because it is labeled as deviant, such as marijuana users that are only deviant because of the label given to them. Becker discusses that once the
Psychological scientists are levying great stress on using naturalistic observations methods for gaining understanding of human behavior as it is fundamental for development of new theories and methods of treatments of psychological patients. The naturalistic observation is a type of study classified under the broader category of field studies; no experimental approaches used in the field or in real-life settings. In the naturalistic observation method the researcher very carefully
Both of the children were a bit older, so he was not constantly monitoring their every move. Instead, his attention shifted from watching the girl, who was playing with another set of children, and watching his son, who was also playing in a separate area with another group of children. Periodically however, he was texting on his phone. This texting interrupted his watching the children. The girl would go
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now