While many might feel inclined to believe that the first part of the book is primarily meant to discuss Auster's father, it is likely that the writer actually wanted the book as a whole to serve as an autobiographical account. This is basically an abstract book and it is difficult to provide a strict definition concerning the writer's intentions when writing it. However, it is nonetheless intriguing to embark on a journey of analysis and to express opinions concerning his exact feelings.

Although the second part of the book focuses primarily on the author, it is difficult to ignore the fact that he puts across feelings related to solitude, as he apparently feels that it would be difficult and almost impossible for him to be the person he wants to be. It practically appears that the first part of the book is meant to set the grounds for readers to be able to engage in analytical...

The first part is easier to understand and many readers are even likely to identify with the writer. In contrast, the second part is more complex and it appears that it was meant to highlight Auster's inner conflicts -- this is a person that is haunted by his problems to integrate society properly.
The second part of the book is almost meant to be understood by individuals who develop a closer relationship with Auster. After reading the first part of the book and after becoming familiarized with the writer's thinking in the second readers are probable to sympathize with him. All things considered, Auster writes with all his heart and both the first and the second parts of the book provide readers with the chance to enter an intimate environment.

Bibliography:

Auster, Paul, "The Invention of Solitude," (Sun, 1982)