Paul Auster's book "The Invention of Solitude" provides readers with complex accounts concerning his father, his father's death, the influence that this event has had on the writer, and his general point-of-view with regard to a series of philosophical questions. Although both parts of the book are somewhat connected with considering the general character of his thinking, it is obvious that he focused on experiencing a maturing process before writing the second part. It appears that he was determined to reinvent himself and that he considered that simply changing the direction of his thoughts would be an important tool in doing so.
Auster seems to be regretful as a result of failing to connect with his father during the individual's lifetime. This regret is pressing and he feels that he needs to evade from the confines of his former relationship with his father. It is actually very probable that he changes the style of narrative in an attempt to better connect with his readers. It is practically as if he would want readers to understand that it is not necessarily his fault that the relationship he had with his father was problematic. The narrator is likely to believe that his father did not provide him with the chance to express himself freely.
The book, as a whole, is probably meant to help Auster as much as it helps readers. The first part is apparently him coming to terms with his father's death and accepting that it would be impossible for them to ever be the family he dreamed of. The second part is Auster trying to detach himself of his past and focusing on restructuring his life in order for him to be able to assume the father role that he dreamed his father would have. At this point he appears to be a more mature writer that is not only concerned about the past, as he looks forward to the future and is determined to make the present more enjoyable.
While many might feel inclined to believe that the first part of the book is primarily meant to discuss Auster's father, it is likely that the writer actually wanted the book as a whole to serve as an autobiographical account. This is basically an abstract book and it is difficult to provide a strict definition concerning the writer's intentions when writing it. However, it is nonetheless intriguing to embark on a journey of analysis and to express opinions concerning his exact feelings.
Although the second part of the book focuses primarily on the author, it is difficult to ignore the fact that he puts across feelings related to solitude, as he apparently feels that it would be difficult and almost impossible for him to be the person he wants to be. It practically appears that the first part of the book is meant to set the grounds for readers to be able to engage in analytical thought when concerning the second part. The first part is easier to understand and many readers are even likely to identify with the writer. In contrast, the second part is more complex and it appears that it was meant to highlight Auster's inner conflicts -- this is a person that is haunted by his problems to integrate society properly.
You’re 87% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.