Verified Document

Patriot Act Ecdriesbaugh Patriot Act Term Paper

Though out-and-out electronic monitoring of private information as evidence in a terrorist-related trial is highly unlikely, it nonetheless puts the average American citizen in a position where his or her privacy is greatly compromised (Soma, Nichols, Rynerson, Maish, and Rogers, 2005). Another section that deems careful scrutiny is Section 215 of the Patriot Act. This section allows the FBI to demand production of any "tangible things" for terrorism investigations. Vagueness and ambiguity seem to be recurring themes throughout the Patriot Act. Section 215 is exceptionally vague in terms of "what is" and "is not" fair game to FBI acquisitions. It seems that the Patriot Act is written in such a way that "anything" could be conceived as being open in the eyes of investigators, including private and confidential handwritten information, tape recordings, hard drives, and CD-ROM -- simply because they are "tangible things" (USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005).

Interestingly enough, the nation's largest telephone carriers are not protected by the Patriot Act even though the Bush administration contracted them for their domestic spying program. Two separate congressional votes rejected the telephone company's request to be granted retroactive immunity. "Most significantly, the bill does not provide immunity to telecommunications companies that participated in the president's warrantless surveillance program. We cannot even consider providing immunity unless we know exactly what we are providing immunity from. And even then, we have to proceed with great caution..." (cited in eWeek, 2007). President Bush requested Congress to offer protection to all carriers that offered to hand over client telephone and e-mail records -- often without a warrant or subpoena -- to government officials. The White House commenced warrantless surveillance activity after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Verizon, at & T, and Qwest Communications International all argue that they thought they were protected under existing federal, state, and local laws. Oddly enough, these carriers are also under a federal court order to neither admit nor refute their involvement in the program. "The full Senate will yet need to resolve the immunity issue. While I appreciate the problems facing the telecommunications companies, the retroactive immunity issue to me is not about...

Passing a law to whitewash the administration's undermining of another law would be a disservice to the American and to the rule of law..." (cited in eWeek, 2007)
People in favor of the Patriot Act argue that if earlier proposed legislation had been enacted before the tragic events of 9/11, this attack might never have happened. People who take this position usually argue that the Act itself does not and will not significantly affect the liberties and privacy of law-abiding citizens and that national security should be the main focus; however, people who harbor concerns with certain components of the Patriot Act are not concerned with overtly violating constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, but that the "balance" between privacy and national security will be in greatly compromised (Soma, Nichols, Rynerson, Maish, and Rogers, 2005). Some argue that the Act unjustly amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by permitting the issuance of search warrants and wiretaps without probable cause of illegal activity. They speculate that such amendments will result in the government using the less restraining FISA standard to obtain criminal evidence government agencies could not otherwise collect under a "probable cause" criterion (Thornburgh, 2005).

References

Baker, N. (2004). National securities vs. civil liberties. Presidential Studies

Quarterly. 33 (3), 547-568.

Epic, (2005). USA Patriot Act sunset. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/sunset.html.

Thomson Gale Databases, (2007). House votes for no telco immunity. eWeek.

Soma, J., Nichols, M., Rynerson, S., Maish, L., and Rogers, J., (2005).

Balance of privacy vs. security: A historical perspective of the U.S.A. Patriot Act.

Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 31(2) 285 (61).

Thornburgh, R. (2005). Balancing civil liberties and homeland security: Does the U.S.A.

Patriot Act avoid Justice Robert H. Jackson's "suicide pact?" Albany Law

Review, 801-814.

USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005. Public Law -- 109 -- 177

March 9, 2006. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/meth/pl109-177.pdf

Sources used in this document:
References

Baker, N. (2004). National securities vs. civil liberties. Presidential Studies

Quarterly. 33 (3), 547-568.

Epic, (2005). USA Patriot Act sunset. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/sunset.html.

Thomson Gale Databases, (2007). House votes for no telco immunity. eWeek.
March 9, 2006. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/meth/pl109-177.pdf
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Patriot Act
Words: 2941 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Patriot Act In response to the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, Congress passed the U.S.A. Patriot Act, an act that gives federal officials more authority to track and intercept communications, for both law enforcement and foreign intelligence gathering purposes (Doyle, 2002). The Patriot Act also gives the Secretary of the Treasury regulatory powers to prevent corruption of U.S. financial institutions for foreign money laundering purposes. The U.S.A. Patriot Act

Patriot Act
Words: 703 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Patriot Act The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act was passed soon after September 11. The groundbreaking legislation, which has caused tremendous controversy and outcry among civil rights activists, has become one of the most important pieces of legislation passed in Congress in recent American history. The U.S.A. Patriot Act contains previsions included in previous anti-terrorist bills, including one

Patriot Act
Words: 1027 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Patriot Act: Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Increases the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Agencies The Patriot Act which was signed as law by President George W. Bush on October 27, 2001 reads like a wish list of the law enforcing agencies. It was long-standing complaint of the law enforcers that the provisions contained in the Bill of Rights such as the "due process" of the Fourth Amendment constrained them in their investigations of suspected

Patriot Act Why Americans Embrace
Words: 1593 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

It is, in one sense, a give and take relationship, but underlying it are the philosophies of Rousseau and Smith, in spite of the fact that both are full of contradictions. Rousseau, for example, states that man's "first law is to provide for his own preservation, his first cares are those which he owes to himself; and, as soon as he reaches years of discretion, he is the sole

Patriot ACT V. Fourth Amendment Patriot Act
Words: 2129 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

PATRIOT ACT V. FOURTH AMENDMENT Patriot Act & 4th Amendment The Fourth Amendment was created in 1791 primarily to end the existence of general warrants, which the American colonialists hated and feared. These warrants were used by the English government to conduct door-to-door searches and mass arrests, often as a coercive method for achieving social and political goals (Maclin and Mirabella, 2011, p. 1052). With this history in mind the text of

Patriot Act This Study Seeks
Words: 4721 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

" Prohibiting "a bill of attainder" means that the U.S. Congress cannot pass a law that considers individual or aggregation blameworthy and later discipline them. Disallowing an ex post facto law implies that the U.S. Congress cannot make any given act a crime after the time the act had been committed. It is doubtful that this applies to a few sections of the Patriot Act. Individuals who monitor the Supreme

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now