Verified Document

Patriot Act Ecdriesbaugh Patriot Act Term Paper

Though out-and-out electronic monitoring of private information as evidence in a terrorist-related trial is highly unlikely, it nonetheless puts the average American citizen in a position where his or her privacy is greatly compromised (Soma, Nichols, Rynerson, Maish, and Rogers, 2005). Another section that deems careful scrutiny is Section 215 of the Patriot Act. This section allows the FBI to demand production of any "tangible things" for terrorism investigations. Vagueness and ambiguity seem to be recurring themes throughout the Patriot Act. Section 215 is exceptionally vague in terms of "what is" and "is not" fair game to FBI acquisitions. It seems that the Patriot Act is written in such a way that "anything" could be conceived as being open in the eyes of investigators, including private and confidential handwritten information, tape recordings, hard drives, and CD-ROM -- simply because they are "tangible things" (USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005).

Interestingly enough, the nation's largest telephone carriers are not protected by the Patriot Act even though the Bush administration contracted them for their domestic spying program. Two separate congressional votes rejected the telephone company's request to be granted retroactive immunity. "Most significantly, the bill does not provide immunity to telecommunications companies that participated in the president's warrantless surveillance program. We cannot even consider providing immunity unless we know exactly what we are providing immunity from. And even then, we have to proceed with great caution..." (cited in eWeek, 2007). President Bush requested Congress to offer protection to all carriers that offered to hand over client telephone and e-mail records -- often without a warrant or subpoena -- to government officials. The White House commenced warrantless surveillance activity after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Verizon, at & T, and Qwest Communications International all argue that they thought they were protected under existing federal, state, and local laws. Oddly enough, these carriers are also under a federal court order to neither admit nor refute their involvement in the program. "The full Senate will yet need to resolve the immunity issue. While I appreciate the problems facing the telecommunications companies, the retroactive immunity issue to me is not about...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

Passing a law to whitewash the administration's undermining of another law would be a disservice to the American and to the rule of law..." (cited in eWeek, 2007)
People in favor of the Patriot Act argue that if earlier proposed legislation had been enacted before the tragic events of 9/11, this attack might never have happened. People who take this position usually argue that the Act itself does not and will not significantly affect the liberties and privacy of law-abiding citizens and that national security should be the main focus; however, people who harbor concerns with certain components of the Patriot Act are not concerned with overtly violating constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, but that the "balance" between privacy and national security will be in greatly compromised (Soma, Nichols, Rynerson, Maish, and Rogers, 2005). Some argue that the Act unjustly amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by permitting the issuance of search warrants and wiretaps without probable cause of illegal activity. They speculate that such amendments will result in the government using the less restraining FISA standard to obtain criminal evidence government agencies could not otherwise collect under a "probable cause" criterion (Thornburgh, 2005).

References

Baker, N. (2004). National securities vs. civil liberties. Presidential Studies

Quarterly. 33 (3), 547-568.

Epic, (2005). USA Patriot Act sunset. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/sunset.html.

Thomson Gale Databases, (2007). House votes for no telco immunity. eWeek.

Soma, J., Nichols, M., Rynerson, S., Maish, L., and Rogers, J., (2005).

Balance of privacy vs. security: A historical perspective of the U.S.A. Patriot Act.

Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 31(2) 285 (61).

Thornburgh, R. (2005). Balancing civil liberties and homeland security: Does the U.S.A.

Patriot Act avoid Justice Robert H. Jackson's "suicide pact?" Albany Law

Review, 801-814.

USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005. Public Law -- 109 -- 177

March 9, 2006. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/meth/pl109-177.pdf

Sources used in this document:
References

Baker, N. (2004). National securities vs. civil liberties. Presidential Studies

Quarterly. 33 (3), 547-568.

Epic, (2005). USA Patriot Act sunset. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/sunset.html.

Thomson Gale Databases, (2007). House votes for no telco immunity. eWeek.
March 9, 2006. Retrieved on 17 November 2007 at http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/meth/pl109-177.pdf
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Government and Its Role and
Words: 1157 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

In this case, individuals are entitled to produce goods and services to meet their human need instead of private profit (Wolff, 2012). Prevention for Power and Privileges under Social Contract: While social contract provides power and privileges to all members of the society, ordinary people are usually prevented from executing the power and privilege that they are entitled to through various ways. Some of these ways include the state's legitimacy claims

Government & Policy the Joyan
Words: 1138 Length: 4 Document Type: Creative Writing

Also, a very liberal strategy like the one that Mexico took after the NAFTA agreements is dangerous to a newly independent state. Extreme liberalization worked well for Mexico because a large and confident Mexico felt like it could benefit greatly from increased trade and labor transfer with the United States, without being pushed around in the agreement, and Canada helped to maintain neutrality. The Joyan Islands, on the other

Government Why Did the Framers
Words: 5873 Length: 18 Document Type: Essay

Republicans construed Obama as suggesting government bailouts for new industries, or at the slightest a more lively federal government function in generating or supporting jobs -- concepts abominations to a lot of conservatives. The Obama campaign countered the idea as political spin that does not replicate the president's feeling or meaning, pointing to full circumstances of the quotation as confirmation (Koch, 2011). Discuss the process of how a Bill becomes a

Government Contracting Process the Federal
Words: 2271 Length: 8 Document Type: Thesis

(Vancketta, 1999) The 'Changes' clause enables the Government "to make unilateral changes to the contract during performance, so long as those changes fall within the contract's scope." The Standard 'Changes' clause utilized in fixes price supply contracts allows the CO to make changes in writing to: 1) the drawings, designs, or specifications when the item is being specifically manufactured for the government; 2) the method of shipment or packing; or 3) the place

Government by the People Federalism
Words: 969 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Lobbyists may accost legislators to directly influence their vote on a certain issue. Lobbyists fulfill the important role of providing information for legislators' decision-making, educating and forming public opinion, and even contributing to and testifying to certain legislations. Lobbyists are mostly involved in the electoral process through the use of political action committees (Magleby et al.). Creating the Constitution The original framers designed the Constitution for ordinary people who were not

Government Effects the Government in
Words: 317 Length: 1 Document Type: Term Paper

Higher taxes for example relates to less income for basic needs. In terms of political ideology, it is obvious that the particular ideology of the government would affect the rest of the country. In terms of the United States, for example, the Republican government has a certain set of ideals in terms of issues such as abortion, religious ideology, and so on, that they tend to impose upon the population. In

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now