Pangman and Seguire Journal Review
"Sexuality and the Chronically Ill Older Adult:
A Social Justice Issue"
"Sexuality and the Chronically Ill Older Adult: A Social Justice Issue" is an article by Verna C. Pangman and Marilyn Seguire, first published in 2000 in Volume 18 of the journal Sexuality and Disability. In their article, Pangman and Seguire provide a penetrating look at an issue all too often obscured by either false assumptions of unimportance, or perhaps mere squeamishness. The subtitle of their article makes it clear that Pangman and Seguire are approaching this issue from a political (if not indeed activist) standpoint: they seem particularly concerned that there is a sense of invisibility to the sex problems of the elderly, and a willingness to ignore those problems. They offer nurses a way of thinking about these issues.
Summary of Article
Pangman and Seguire begin by brushing away some of the myths and rumors that still cling like cobwebs to the subject of sexuality and the elderly -- notions that the elderly are sexless or undesirable, based on the strong association of sexuality with youth in western society. They offer a definition of sexuality and sexual health in which the life-affirming aspects of the sex act, and conceive of "sexual health care" as being "an essential component of overall wellness during one's developmental lifespan" (49). They offer a cursory discussion of "invisibility and visibility perspectives" of the sexuality of the elderly and chronically ill, sketching some stereotyped views that are lingeringly held by some sectors of society and even among health care professionals. Pangman and Seguire are explicit in offering a "social justice" perspective in which the mere awareness of these issues among nurses can "[raise] the level of consciousness" and "help to dispel the myth that aging renders the chronically ill older adult sexless and worthless" (50).
The authors approach the issue with a willingness to acknowledge that...
Even though the health strategy was explained clearly (better education, taking the patient's sexual health history), it was something that most nurses should already be doing or know how to do. The article did not provide any new revelations to this issue. They authors seemed to be telling the audience thing they should already have knowledge of. They have not done enough research to present the reading audience with any
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now