McQueen noted in 1990 that, "Pakistan has had consistent growth averaging 6.7% over the last decade, placing it among the fast-growing third-world economies. Some apprehension exists regarding deterioration in the law and order situation in Sindh Province, where in recent months ethnic and politically motivated violence has claimed a number of lives and slowed industrial activity. Regionalism, ethnic violence, and political uncertainty cloud the economic outlook, but many analysts are sanguine.
Pakistan's economy continues to be dominated by agriculture and agro-based industries. Agriculture employs 50% of the labor force in Pakistan, earns (directly or indirectly) approximately 70% to GDP. Industry contributes apporximately 20% to GDP and has become increasingly important to the country's development and export potential. The public sector share in Pakistani industry has diminished over recent years, and in fiscal year 1986, accounted for less than 20% of total fixed capital formation. Pakistan's industrial growth is supported by substantial imports of raw materials, intermediate inputs, and machinery." (McQueen, 1990)
When McQueen did her research, principal U.S. exports to Pakistan were soybean oil, wheat, tallow, machinery, transportation equipment (including aircraft and parts), chemicals, and phosphatic fertilizers. (McQueen, 1990)
According to Pakistani sources, aid disbursements increased some 40% in fiscal year 1988-89 to $2,551 million. (McQueen, 199) The World Bank, IDA, Asian Development Bank, Japan, and the United States were the chief donors, as expected given the history of the era.
In fact, at the time, the United States planned to authorize several billion dollars to Pakistan in military and economic aid over the next several years. The military aid made its way to Pakistan, but very little economic aid did. This was catastrophic for Pakistan since many USAID-funded projects provide opportunities for the sale...
In addition the continued decline of the fiscal account will affect both debt sustainability and external balances ("Monetary Policy Decision"). As it pertains to medium term fiscal sustainability which must be present to achieve necessary overall macroeconomic stability, the tax-GDP ratio must be increased ("Monetary Policy Decision"). Additionally government expenditures must decrease ("Monetary Policy Decision"). The article also reports that the revenue deficit, which represents the difference between total revenues
This also implies inadequacies in fiscal sustainability, which influences investments in private sectors. The second channel happens through the level, composition and quality involved within the public investment, which shows the level at which the public investment replaces the private investments (Schmidt- Hebbel, Serven, & Solimano, 1996). The final channel regards the level of taxation on the corporate earnings and the rules applicable in depreciations. There have been arguments that fiscal policy
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now