The organization is responsible for conducted inspections and responding to complaints. The research indicates that although OSHA is instrumental to ensuring the safety of American workers, the organization has experienced some scrutiny associated with the manner in which it is managed. The research found that OSHA is often riddled with problems associated with other government agencies including a slow bureaucratic process. However OSHA is attempting to become more educational and communicative as it pertains to how it associates with employers. However, it can be concluded that OSHA is necessary and needed to guarantee that businesses and organizations comply with the health and safety standards that keep employees and customers safe. References

Gaudio Beth (2005) OSHA Inspection... Can it Happen to You? NFIB Legal Foundation. Retrieved July 26 from; http://www.nfib.com/object/IO_19802.html

(2008). Political Control and Bureaucratic Autonomy Revisited: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of OSHA Enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 33+.
Macleod, D. (2000)the Way Out of theOSHA Ergonomics Debacle. Retrieved July 26 from; http://www.danmacleod.com/Articles/OSHA_Debacle.htm

Nash, J.L. (2003, December). The Top 10 Ways to Get into Trouble with OSHA: What Are the Most Common, and the Most Effective, Ways for a Company to Have Big Problems with OSHA? We Asked More Than a Dozen Experts, and Found a Surprising Consensus. Occupational Hazards, 65, 27+.

Nash, J.L. (2004, August). Inside Story: Working for OSHA; What Do Agency Employees-Those Faceless Bureaucrats So Often Ridiculed by American Industry-Think of Their Jobs, Their Mission and the Institution They Work for? The Answers May Surprise You. Occupational Hazards, 66, 24+.