It is important that every employee understand that before each makes his/her own initiatives it is better to know the company first because there are times that some they do not understand fully the main objective of the company thereby making jump in to conclusions sacrificing the ultimate goal of the company. Like for example in the University of Western Australia (Robson 1005), their teaching on organizational management is focused on main key principles: (1) Equity and Justice (2) respect for People and (3) Personal and professional responsibility. These set of values and code of ethics followed the global standards and expected for both the staff and students to follow.

Evidently, the company's problem regarding workflow between the product division's art, copy and medical department vs. The Quality Assurance Department and BFAD can be easily solved if the employees will adhere to the Code of ethics.

First, this kind of problem could have been solved easily through compromise from both sides. Like for example, the product...

In this regard, QAD's job is only to re-check and ensure if the BFAD guidelines were followed. Likewise, QAD could be requested to update the corporate guidelines on packaging artworks and align it with the BFAD guidelines so that it will not turn out the corporate guidelines are much stricter than the BFAD guidelines.
Indeed, this kind of ethical corporate issues can be handled through proper communications and deeper understanding of the corporate codes of ethics. Hence, it is always advised that companies would encourage open communication within the employees of whatever division or departments.

Reference:

Robson, Allan. Code of Ethicss & Code of Conduct. Vice-Chancellor, University of Western Australia. September 2005. http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:VoFMZJRAOEYJ:www.hr.uwa.edu.au/publications/code_of_ethicss+Personal%2BCode%2Bof%2BEthicss+Human+Resources&hl=en&gl=ph&ct=clnk&cd=2