Work Alienation
Alienation and Organization behavior
Objective viewpoint
Solutions to Alienation
Results and effectiveness of solutions
The management of the employment relationship has become an area of priority for the managers in organizations as companies and organizations strive to gain better output and productivity. This enhanced output and productivity is now focused on being obtained from increased engagement of the human resources in a company as organizations worldwide understand the need to maximize the potential of an organization's human resources to attain the goals and objectives.
This focus on the extreme utilization of the human resources often entails the situations where a limited workforce is stressed to perform as companies strive to gain maximum profits and often resort to downsizing of workforce. This stress and strain leaves a mental impact on some or a large section of the employees which results in negative mental environment at the workplace. This condition is often regarded as the alienation of the workforce at work which tends to strain the relation between the employee employer relationships. Thus the situations of alienation of the employees at work not only have a social and economic impact on business as well as the wider community within which the employees function, it also impacts the overall environment of the company and sometimes even the organizational behavior.
Alienation and Organization behavior
Organizational behavior is termed as the collective attitude that persists among the people in within the organization that is developed through regulations in the organization and is affected by the decisions taken by the organization authorities. It is also defined as the study of human behavior when the subjects are in an organizational set up (Moorhead and Griffin, 1995). It is essentially a condition where the human behavior and the organization's behavior tend to overlap. There are three aspects of organizational behavior- between the individual and the organization, between groups in and the organization or outside and the behavior of an organization itself (Wanger and Hollenbeck, 2010). In this study we restrict ourselves to the relations between the employees and the organization and groups within the organization and look into the aspect of alienation of employee with respect to the combined behavior of the organization.
Alienation of workers is referred to the detachment of the workers from the affairs of an organization on a personal basis as well as with the others in the organization. In cases where this alienation continues for a sufficiently long duration of time, such workers also develops disconnect with the organization.
This directly affects and gets reflected in the organizational behavior in a negative way. Since the alienated workers find themselves not being able to fulfill their social needs a gap develops between the perceptions of an objective work situation and the values, ideals and desires of the workers (Jesus Suarez-Mendoza & Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, 2008). The negative elements that are developed within an individual also get reflected in the behavior of the workers. When a large section of the workers in an organization go through the similar phase, their negative attitude manifests in a negative manner throughout the organization (Armstrong-Stassen, 2006).
There can be several manifestations of alienation from work that can include instances like decreased job involvement and a general deficiency to identify with the organization. Other problems that can arise due to alienation of workers at work can be instances of reduced decision making ability and minimal usage of skills (Berger, Sedivy, Cisler & Dilley, 2008). Workers who are suffering from alienation tend to be disengaged from their work and have a general lack of involvement in the work role and responsibilities. The motivation of the workers is considerably reduced when they suffer from alienation. This is very detrimental for any organization and has a direct impact on the overall organizational behavior in a negative way (Banai, Reisel & Probst, 2004).
Alienated workers also manifest their frustrations that they go through by becoming increasingly detached with the organizational goals, tend to avoid autonomy, responsibility and higher status and instead engage in work and interests that are non-productive. Another important fall out of employees who are alienated id that they generally remain uninvolved in the organization activities and they work only to earn money.
Therefore the above attributes clearly indicate that if a majority of employees are alienated from the organization, their actions and attitudes are generally negative. If this is the generally trend among the majority of the employees then it is obvious that he negative attitude and actions would have a collective negative manifestation. Since the collective manifestation...
.....interpersonal skills in the workplace cannot be underestimated, as organizational performance depends on the ability of employees to communicate, solve problems, and make ethical decisions. Employers value interpersonal skills as much as technical skills, and like technical skills, interpersonal skills can be taught and learned in formal and systematic ways (Reece & Reece, 2016). However, interpersonal relations in the workplace often proceed informally. People form alliances and allegiances based on
Terkel, Working (Organizational Behavior) The interview subjects in Studs Terkel's book Working run the gamut from farm wife to university professor, but all are able to be articulate about what it is that they do for a living. However, some basic patterns emerge upon examination of a representative sample of Terkel's interviews. The first thing to note is the relationship of education to work: in some sense, these people are all
organization described in the Kuppler (n.d.) case study is General Motors (GM). General Motors is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in the world. Its other strengths include its operations in more than a hundred different countries. In spite of its more than a century of relative success, GM has experienced growing pains in recent years due to what Kuppler (n.d.) calls a "culture crisis." The organizational culture of
This is known among police as "professional courtesy," and violating it has been known to result in the cited officer's commander's contacting the issuing officer's commander with an (informal) complaint, expected to be addressed by an (informal) lecture on the topic of professional courtesy. Occasionally, a "ticket war" will erupt between neighboring police departments, sparked, initially, by the issuance of summonses by officers from one department to off-duty officers from
Organizational Theory and Public Management: Marx, Weber, and Freud. When one considers the vast topic of organizational theory, one of the foremost names in modern study is undoubtedly Robert B. Denhardt. As a professor of Public Administration at Arizona State University, he has authored numerous works on the topic of human behavior as it relates to public organization. Of course, in today's world, this area of study is no small thing --
According to the authors, this can be done if employees are given a sense of importance in the organizations. Knowledge workers are already short in supplies and most competing rivals also compete to get the best human resource in terms of knowledge workers. It is therefore essential for any organization to retain this highly skilled part of their workforce and in order to do that organizations must eliminate the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now