Verified Document

Organizational Behavior The Relevance Of Understanding Group Essay

Organizational Behavior The relevance of understanding group behavior as well as group properties cannot be overstated. This is more so the case for those keen on becoming effective managers and/or members of various groups. Managers who happen to be familiar with group behavior within organizations are more likely to fast track the accomplishment of the various goals and objectives of their respective organizations by amongst other things using groups more effectively.

Nature of Groups and Group Behavior within Organizations

Key Definitions

A group according to Griffin and Moorhead (2011, p.240) "is two or more people who interact with one another such that each person influences and is influenced by each other person." It is however important to note that apart from this definition, several other definitions of a group have been proposed by various authors.

Types of Groups

In basic terms, groups can be divided into two. On one hand are formal groups and on the other, informal groups. Formal groups according to Griffin and Moorhead (2011) are established by an entity for the performance of the said entity's duties or work. On the other hand, informal groups in the opinion of the authors "are formed by their members and consist of friendship groups, which are relatively permanent and interest groups, which may be shorter lived" (Griffin and Moorhead 2011, p.243). The key distinguishing factor between informal and formal groups is that while formal groups are established by the organization in question, informal groups are rather spontaneous. In that regard, the various roles members of formal groups perform are largely predetermined. Roles in informal groups are dependent on members' interactions.

2.3 Stages of Group Development

Group development takes time and in most cases, groups pass through a number of phases before addressing the purpose of their formation and consequently adjourning. In this section, I will address the various stages of group development identified by Tucker. According to Martin (2005), Tucker originally came up with...

In addition to getting to know each other, members of the group in this particular stage also seek to familiarize themselves with the task (s) at hand. Roles and hierarchy also begin to be defined during this stage.
2.3.2 Storming

According to Martin (2005), this stage marks the emergence of a formal structure. This stage is also often characterized by both conflict and competition as the confidence of group members begins to increase and as group members begin to present their own agenda to the group. As Martin (2005, p.233) points out, "if successfully handled, this stage leads to a more focused group…"

2.3.3 Norming

Cohesion is the main characteristic of this stage of group development. The stage in the words of Martin (2005, p.233) also "reflects the process of establishing the norms to be operated within the group."

2.3.4 Performing

It is during this stage that the group reaches its peak in regard to its effectiveness in addressing its various objectives. Not all groups are lucky enough to reach this stage though. As Martin (2005) points out, a group in this stage of development can be regarded mature.

2.3.5 Adjourning

This is the stage in which the group is broken-up, disbanded or 'unformed' after the accomplishment of the task which informed its formation in the first place (Martin, 2005).

2.4 Group Norms

A norm in the words of Griffin and Moorhead (2011, p.249), "is a standard against which the appropriateness of a behavior is judged." In that regard, norms in a group setting come in handy in the maintenance of consistency in behavior. Most groups use norms to control their groups and hence the relevance of norms when it comes to enhancing the viability of a team as a unit cannot be overstated.

2.5 Groupthink

This is yet another important factor to consider because of the impact it…

Sources used in this document:
References

Griffin, R.W. And Moorhead, G. 2011. Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations. 10th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

Hellriegel, D. And Slocum, J.W. 2007. Organizational Behavior. 11th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

Martin, J. 2005. Organizational Behavior and Management. 3rd ed. Bedford Row, London: Thomson Learning.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Organizational Behavior in a Competitive Environment, Where
Words: 2239 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

Organizational Behavior In a competitive environment, where change is the only constant phenomenon, learning and knowledge management are vital for sustenance and growth of organizations. A precise universal definition of knowledge can be elusive, because it is complex and manifests itself in various forms in individuals as well as in organizations. Individual or tacit knowledge is confined to the people who possess it and cannot be structured or managed in the

Organizational Behavior
Words: 7778 Length: 25 Document Type: Research Paper

Organizational Behavior In 1984, the movie The Gods Must be Crazy depicted a Kalahari bushman who finds a Coca-Cola bottle that was discarded from an airplane into the desert. The bushman does not recognize the bottle or the brand, and the situation leads to all manner of confusion among the tribe, who try to decipher the meaning of the bottle. Such a story would be rather incomprehensible today, that there would

Learning Journal for Organizational Behavior
Words: 2302 Length: 8 Document Type: Journal

Given the capriciousness of the human condition with respect to continuing redefinitions of personal and professional success, human resource managers are faced with some difficult choices in formulating recommendations for best practices. Therefore, the learning journal would undergo a series of draft versions that would be used to solicit feedback from experts in the field who could point out flaws and areas that required additional research or support to

Management Theory Organizational Behavior Management
Words: 1580 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

325). Robertson & Tang (1998) demonstrate through systematic analysis how commitment in an organization can be empirically measured and how organizations can use that information to improve organizational structures, systems, behaviors and thought processes. This can only be achieved through consistent, objective and systematic processes that automatically work to support a more diverse and functioning work environment. Q4. Explain what is meant by the term "workforce diversity?" Workforce diversity means different things

Strengths and Weaknesses of Various Organizational Behavior Theories...
Words: 4343 Length: 14 Document Type: Essay

A Review of Organizational Behavior Theories Because organizations are the primary means by which capital is earned and job are created, it is not surprising that there has been a great deal of scholarship concerning how organizations actually “behave” in the real world. The purpose of this paper is to provide a current definition of organizational behavior together with a statement of three prominent theories of organizational behavior, French and Raven's

Analyzing Individual Differences and Organizational Behavior
Words: 763 Length: 2 Document Type: Conclusion

Individual Differences and Organisational Behaviour Explain How Individual Differences Might Be Synergistic to Organizational Behaviour In the last couple of years, diversity is one factor that has come to play a pivotal role in organization circles, as a result of increase in the globalization trend, higher diversity workforce, and the rising job complexity. Organizations that make use of global strategies find cultural diversity very vital. When doing business globally, or with some

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now