opportunities in Asia (South East and South Asia) are huge and so are the challenges
For the last decade the countries like Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Hong Kong and South Korea that collectively forms the part of South East Asia have registered consistent growth year after year making an impressive position in the economic development on the international level (Pempel, 1999). These countries have shown the growth in terms of Gross Domestic Product at an average rate of 6% to 9% annually. The dawn of 1997 has darkened the glory of these courtiers with a major slump in the economic conditions and financial development. Asian financial crisis that erupted in 1997 has miserably affected the local stock market and currency market of the Asian countries. The Stock market of these countries had declined by 70% and with the same figure the currency of has also depreciated against dollar, forcing them to knock the door of IMF for financial assistance (Corsetti, Pesenti, & Roubini, 1999).
The purpose of this literature is to analyze the transformational changes that have brought about in the Asian nations after the Asian crisis and its impact on the major economic sector. The policy implication and regulatory framework will be analyzed with the view of great economist, academician and economic and business journals thus forming the secondary source of data. Emphasis is given on the Western companies seeking investment opportunities in the Southeast and South Asian market along with the challenges faced by them.
Institutionalization and Transformation process after Asian Crisis
Many economists argued that the developmental model applied in the Asian regions which was the source of growth for these nations was then considered as a reason behind the crisis. It has also been observed through various economic reviews that East Asian economies were more prone to external shocks because democratization had restricted government's contribution towards promoting financial reform and incorporating new industrial policies (Allen, & Gale, 2000). The Asian crisis has opened new avenues of looking at the growth prospects of the economies and diverted attention from developmental models towards state's role in reform in growth and development. With Asian crisis, the transformation of Asian countries presents a learning live example of how these developmental states have been exposed to internal and external influences to incorporate change and what role democracy has played in providing public good.
Asian Economic Model or Asian Capitalism was much praised by many of the economist due to its successful implementation in the decade of 1980-1990. The Asian Pacific region especially Japan and South Korea were prominent player in the effective implementation of the capitalism than any of the Western states. The focus of Asian economic model or Asian Capitalism was on integrating the market economy with the policy formulation by centralized government. The coordination of market players and government in the formulation of business policies was much credited to the Asian Pacific region where it was applied at its optimum level. The Asia's economic prosperity was credited by many of the economist to the Asian Economic Model. However this concept was much criticized in the west and according to them the growth of Asian Pacific region especially Japan was not because of this government and business community collaboration but rather it was the outcome of high level of education prevailing in the region along with improved and ever increasing saving rates and strong labor market contribution towards the growth.
With the advent of Asian financial crisis and its effects on the international level, the view about Asian economic model was changed and many of the economists, policy makers and academician were of the view that Asian dependence on the government directed investment and feebly regulated financial system was a risky mix for the development of the region. As such structural weaknesses result in excess debt, over investment situation and financial crisis in the economy. It had seemed difficult for the Asian economies to adopt structural transformation. Many of the authoritarians still support the view of Asian economic model and support their core values of "Confucian values." They are reluctant to move away from the business-government cooperation model and adopt western economic model. It was difficult for their minds to adopt such a structural reform even after the blast of debt bomb and crash of stock market and exchange rate markets during crisis. Asia's structural changes were found to be government and business collaboration released, dissolution of critical banks and companies, tightening of the financial disclosure regulation and free economic system was setup with the deregulation of the economy so that it's open to foreign investment and international competition (Radelet, Sachs, Cooper, & Bosworth,...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now