The fact that most men sublimate this feeling, and instead identify with their father to obtain the maternal figure in the form of another woman, is the reason the Oedipus myth was generated in the first place.
Freud's theory was popular not only 'on the couch' but in literary theory. Ernest Jones suggested that it is the reason Hamlet cannot bring himself to kill his uncle: "Now comes the father's death and the mother's second marriage. The long 'repressed' desire to take his father's place in his mother's affection is stimulated to unconscious activity by the sight of some one usurping this place exactly as he himself had once longed to do… the two recent events, the father's death and the mother's second marriage . . . represented ideas which in Hamlet's unconscious fantasy had for many years been closely associated" (Jones 98-99).
Regardless of the merit of Freud's theory, Freud's understanding of Oedipus as a kind of primordial 'everyman' whose actions could be applied to everyone from a neurotic to Shakespeare's Hamlet, is not a true literary understanding of Oedipus' character. Oedipus, a king and a wise man in the original Greek tragedy, is presented as an extraordinary figure brought low by fate and given a uniquely horrifying fate (Mitchell-Boyask 2002). It was Freud who suggested that the unique nature of Oedipus' character and the horrors inflicted upon this unhappy man by the gods were not so unique...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now