Verified Document

Nuclear WMD A Real Threat A-Level Coursework

After the treaty was signed, the international community's interest to agree to rules that had been accepted created a source of safety. The current world has termed the treaty as a regime. In the U.S. context, their aim is to provide security for their citizens because of the nuclear weapons threat. The treaty has been signed by more than 180 states worldwide. In order to ensure that there is safety while nations continue with their nuclear program, a separate organization was created to oversee the process of monitoring such activities: the International Energy Atomic Agency (IAEA). U.S. As the hegemonic state has the power to protect other nations from harm: other nations view this as a mutual benefit. While the U.S. gain more power plus safety from states that are within the NPT treaty, smaller states are convinced instead of investing in nuclear programs for safety, to look up to U.S. For protection (Gallacher, Blacker & Bellany, 2005).

Many states view this mutual benefit as a substantial gain even in anarchic unstable world. However, within the NPT there is a loophole in subsection 2 of article 4 of the treaty. This loophole states that all the nations in the treaty should undertake have a right to participate fully in the exchange of materials, equipment, and scientific and technological information in peaceful use of nuclear weapons. The section permits member states to develop nuclear material as long as its use is peaceful and production sourced from clean energy (Kessler, 2005).

With Pakistan and India having exemplified...

The possibility of nuclear weapons is a weakness because many nations will try to their best to develop their own weapons. The safety measures put in place by IAEA were to safeguard and limit nuclear weapons from spreading into the international community. U.S. controls the way it connects with other countries, and this is evident through the transfers made for safe nuclear technology through IAEA. The U.S. has ensured security of its people through superior firepower and control over other nations through establishing international agreements (Gallacher, Blacker & Bellany, 2005).
The NPT Treaty regime has reached an international level: member states make rules guaranteeing safety from threats of nuclear war for many nations. The U.S. formulated the NPT permitting IAEA the protection necessary in ensuring that different states developing nuclear weapons and technology are monitored. Nearly all the nations have accepted the terms of mutual protection from U.S. (Forsberg, 2005).

References

Forsberg, R. (2005). Nonproliferation Primer: Preventing the Spread of Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons. Michigan: MIT Press

Gallacher, J, Blacker, C. & Bellany, I. (2005). The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. New York:

Routledge

Kessler, J. (2005). Verifying Nonproliferation Treaties: Obligation, Process, and Sovereignty.

California: Government Printing Office.

Sources used in this document:
References

Forsberg, R. (2005). Nonproliferation Primer: Preventing the Spread of Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons. Michigan: MIT Press

Gallacher, J, Blacker, C. & Bellany, I. (2005). The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. New York:

Routledge

Kessler, J. (2005). Verifying Nonproliferation Treaties: Obligation, Process, and Sovereignty.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction
Words: 1331 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

There is ample evidence according to some, including CIA Director George Tenet who stated in 2000 Al-Qa'ida was attempting to gain chemicals to use in terrorist activities. There is no question that terrorists seem to have an interest in such weapons. However, while they may make a concerted effort to get these weapons, they may still lack the technology and financial abundance to deploy such weapons on a massive

WMD Iran's Weapons of Mass
Words: 1212 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/articles/20060324.aspx Anthrax When we think of warfare and terrorist attacks, we tend to think of large destructive pieces of machinery -- nuclear missiles and/or bombs, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and even the still-too-recent memory of massive airplanes being turned from passenger vehicles into weapons. Not all forces of mass death and destruction come in large packages, however. In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, several small, standard

Iranian Nuclear Ambitions and American
Words: 1254 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Once that occurs, the likelihood of a nuclear detonation on U.S. soil becomes a virtual certainty; already, renowned experts like Graham Allison (2004) consider this a matter of when not if. Ironically, given the complexities of the primary military threats of the Cold War, the U.S. now faces much greater risk of a devastating nuclear attack detonated in a U-Haul trailer crossing a Manhattan bridge, or one spanning the

U.S. Nuclear Policy: Non-Proliferation Vs.
Words: 3464 Length: 10 Document Type: Thesis

S. had provided the technology needed to promote the development of nuclear weapons. However, the U.S. argued that it had provided civilian instead of military technology, therefore had not violated the treaty. The Politics of Proliferation The politics of non-proliferation are complex. In the case of the U.S., the agreement and terms must satisfy every party involved. On one hand, the U.S. is under an obligation built on trust, that it will

Iran and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Words: 3231 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Iran and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty George W. Bush has labeled Iran part of the three nations which most threaten United States security as a nation, along with Iraq and North Korea. He based this statement on the premise that these three nations were developing "weapons of mass destruction," specifically, nuclear arms. Iraq, it has already been established, does not have weapons of mass destruction. North Korea might, and is currently

FBI Drugs and WMDs
Words: 3378 Length: 11 Document Type: Research Paper

Introduction The USS Cole Bombing in October 2000 was a prelude to the intense focus on the spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that the FBI took up in earnest one year later in the wake of and in response to 9/11. With the killing of several crewmen and the wounding of several more, the USS Cole Bombing was in reality just one more terrorist incident in an already growing

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now