North Carolina's Approach To Sexual Predators
Recently, North Carolina struck down North Carolina's ban on registered sex offenders using social media sites like Facebook and Twitter. had an issue with Cooper notes that there are still laws on the books that investigators can use to charge suspects with soliciting children online. However, he believes we need a law to try to prevent child sex crimes before they happen. "There are laws for soliciting children online and these predators should be convicted to the fullest extent of the law, but that's after the fact," said Cooper. "That's after they have solicited the child. This law works to put a preventive barrier, to prevent that sex offender from going online to start with."
Laws that prohibit Predatory Conduct
One of the laws involve North Carolina's ban on accessing commercial social networking sites by sex offenders is unconstitutional on its face, the court of appeals held this morning in State v. Packingham. In the state of North Carolina a Class I felony for any registered sex offender to be able to access a commercial social networking web site where the offender is familiar with that the site allows children to join. The law describes commercial social networking Web site approximately to comprise any site that has the following:
Derives revenue, through membership fees, advertising, or other sources;
Facilitates social introduction between two or more persons for friendship, meetings, or information exchanges
For example, registrant Lester Packingham was discovered to be using Facebook under a false name and charged with a violation of G.S. 14-202.5 (Cooper, 2013). A jury found him to be guilty. When it came down to the appeal, he made the argument that the ruling violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment privileges to association, expression, free speech, press and assembly (Cooper A., 2013). He likewise made the dispute that the law was impermissibly overbroad and vague in defilement of due process. However, the court of appeals made an arrangement on the account of both fronts.
Research shows that The North Carolina law says...
Rankin (2003) affirmed that the purpose of art therapy is to address the major affects of trauma on the child's life. Additionally, Rankin (2003) stated that art interventions begin with self-management, then proceed with safety planning, telling the trauma story, grieving traumatic losses, self-concept and world view revision and finally ends with self and relational development. Treatment progress and outcomes will vary from patient to patient, as therapy is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now