This will mean more, not less, federal involvement in the program. Overall, reaction to Obama's plans are negative. Most who were opposed to Bush's policy had hoped for a brand new start rather than a rehash of the old bill (No child left behind act, 2009).
While this article presents a convincing argument that No Child Left Behind has fallen short of its original goals, there are those who think it has improved public education for some students, especially those with learning disabilities.
The bill forces schools to issue easy-to-interpret report cards that break down a student's progress, including those with learning disabilities. It establishes proficiency levels specifically for the disabled student in order to hold the school district responsible for ensuring adequate education is received by all students (staff, 2009).
Others feel NCLB is working better than the test scores show, because the standards, all around, are higher than they have been ever before. The U.S. Department of Education -- perhaps not the most objective viewpoint -- says that due to the accountability of teachers and school districts to higher standards, students are learning more and learning it better (Nation's report card shows record gains, 2007).
There is a faction that points to other national and international tests that students take. They point out that, according to those tests, and rankings of the U.S. education system vs. other countries, there is proof NCLB is not working. They further point out that only 68% of U.S. fourth-graders can read at a minimum proficiency level (Rogers, 2009 ).
Bibliography
Nation's report card shows record gains. (2007, Sept). Retrieved Dec 6, 2009, from Ed.gov: http://www.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/achieve/report-card2007.html
No child left behind. (2004, Sept 21). Retrieved Dec 6, 2009, from edweek.org: http://www.edweek.org/rc/issues/no-child-left-behind/
No child left behind act. (2009, Oct 15). Retrieved Dec 6, 2009, from The new york times: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/no_child_left_behind_act/index.html
Rogers, G. (2009, May 22). How the no child left behind act is failing students. Retrieved Dec 6, 2009, from Articlesbase.com: http://www.articlesbase.com/education-articles/how-the-no-child-left-behind-act-is-failing-students-930464.html
staff, N. p. (2009, Mar 9). No child left behind act: An overview . Retrieved Dec 6, 2009, from Ld.org: http://www.ncld.org/on-capitol-hill/federal-laws-aamp-ld/no-child-left-behind-act/no-child-left-behind-act-nclb-an-overview
(No Child Left behind Act Aims to Improve Success for All Students and Eliminate the Achievement Gap) Parents will also gain knowledge regarding how the quality of learning is happening in their child's class. They will get information regarding the progress of their child vis-a-vis other children. Parents have of late been given the privilege to ask for information regarding the level of skills of the teachers. It offers parents
No Child Left Behind Act (Public Law 107-110, 115), is a Congressional Act signed into law by George W. Bush in January 2002. The Bill was a bi-partisan initiative, supported by Senator Edward Kennedy, and authorized a number of federal programs designed to improve standards for educational accountability across all States, districts, and increase the focus on reading. Much of the NCLB focus is based on the view that American
No Child Left Behind Act Impact of the "No Child Left Behind Act" in California Schools The Federal "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" which President Bush signed into law in January 2002, has been an issue of debate across the country for the last two years. Its impact on public education has varied from state to state. According to the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," every state must
In principle, it is now believed that the traditional emphasis on passive learning through lectures and textbook methods of instruction are far less effective than active methods of academic instruction. Whereas modern educators have been pushing for public education systems to move away from passive learning methods, the NCLB creates the exact opposite incentive: to waste classroom modules memorizing information for the test and practicing test-taking instead of learning
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Key political, or legal issues, changes in K-12 assessment goals A Statute of instructive practice within the K-12 cluster involves instruction, curriculum and assessment among students. In this case, alignment ensures that the three capacities coordinated with the same goal and strengthened instead of working at cross-purposes. An appraisal will also measure the success of what the students are being taught on whether their
III. Other Issues and Challenges The No Child Left Behind act is viewed by many if not most of today's teachers as having tunnel vision and that acknowledges little but standardized testing outcomes. Specifically reported by Dillon (2009) in the 2009 New York Times article entitled: "No Child Law Is Not Closing a Racial Gap" that there has not been a narrowing of the gap between white and minority students in
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now