NEW YORK CITY'S BEVERAGE BAN (300 words requested)
Last year, the New York City Board of Health followed the lead of Mayor Michael Bloomberg and banned the sale of sodas and other sugary beverages in serving sizes over 16 fluid ounces. The purpose of the ban was to reduce the societal harm caused by the consumption of high-calorie, high-sugar-content drinks because they contribute to the problem of obesity. Since then, a New York trial court rejected the ban as "arbitrary and capricious," largely because it was established by the Board of Health instead of the New York City Council. The Mayor responded publicly that his administration intends to appeal the decision and that the soda ban is no different, in principle, from similar measures already in place, such as against smoking in restaurants and trans-fats in commercially-prepared foods. The justification is simply that obesity burdens public health care resources and therefore, some of its known causes should be subject to regulation. Meanwhile, opponents of the beverage ban argue that it violates the personal autonomy and freedom of personal choice. They are concerned that regulating soda cup size is a slippery slope leading to laws prohibiting eating too many calories or banning sunbathing, because they also cause health problems.
The legal basis of the State Supreme Court decision was that the ban is "arbitrary" because it would only have applied to some types of businesses and only to those regulated by the city. For example, supermarkets and chain stores were exempted, even though they might be located on the same block as businesses affected by the ban. Ultimately, whether or not future versions of the same law survive legal challenges will probably depend more on how they are framed and whether they resolve some of the issues that the court characterized as "arbitrary" rather than on whether or not the city authorities have the legal right to regulate the sale of large servings of some kinds of beverages.
Source Consulted
Saul, M.H. (2013). "Judge Cans Soda Ban: Ruling on Sugary Drinks Marks Rare Defeat
on Health Policy for Bloomberg." The Wall Street Journal (March 11, 2013).
Retrieved online: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323826704578354543929974394.html
Argument Opposing the Ban The primary argument against the beverage ban is that it violates the fundamental autonomy and freedom of personal choice. Critics argue that in that respect, it is no different from prohibiting the consumption of a maximum amount of calories or banning sunbathing, because the former also contributes to obesity and because the latter is known to cause sin cancers that are sometimes deadly and that are also
Banning Soda There is no real argument in favor of soda; it adds absolutely nothing positive to anyone's daily dietary intake. In fact, it is said to contribute heavily to obesity, diabetes, heart disease tooth decay, and other serious health issues. It is argued that by banning soda many of these negative aspects will be eliminated or at least reduced and therefore reduce health care costs associated with drinking soda. With
Smoking Ban Tobacco smoke should certainly be considered a toxic chemical, and its risks to human health have been well-known for decades. Any reasonable person -- or indeed anyone who is even slightly familiar with the medical and scientific evidence -- would certainly know this today. Forty years ago, the federal government banned tobacco advertising from radio and television and put warning labels on tobacco products, while class action lawsuits have
Is Bottled Water Truly as Pure as the Industry Would Like Us to Believe? The NRDC hired three independent laboratories to conduct the testing of more than 1,000 plastic bottles -- 103 different brands -- and found that "about one third" the 103 brands contained "significant contamination," that is, levels of chemical or bacterial contaminants that exceed federal and state standards. After the independent labs completed their research and testing, NRDC
Population Health: Childhood Obesity Of all of the current factors impacting population health, childhood obesity may be have the greatest threat for long-term damage, as well as being the one most highly linked to culture, socioeconomic status, and personal liberties. As a result, efforts to reduce childhood obesity have been met with ambivalence and, sometimes even hostility. Part of the reason for this hostility is that the two factors that
Alcoholic Beverage Industry Throughout the world, in all industries it is now a period of consolidation and this process is now taking place for a large number of companies from different continents and different countries, and the only reason for consolidation is the fact that they come from a common industry. The undisputed largest economy in the world is now the United States and this also contains the largest companies in
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now