Verified Document

Need For An Organizational Policy On Security Interviews And Security Interrogations Essay

Security Interviews and Interrogation THE WHAT's AND THE HOW's

Security Interviews and Security Investigations

The Difference

Offhand, interrogations are conducted with criminal suspects, while interviews are held with witnesses to crimes and with job applicants (Stephens, 2014). All kinds of questions can be asked when interrogating suspects. But certain questions are not allowed when interviewing job applicants. These questions include age, the applicant's children and number of marriages, disability, race or ethnicity, marital status, political beliefs and party, faith or religion and sexual orientation or preference (Stephens).

Interviews and interrogations are also conducted differently. Female witnesses differ in perception from male witnesses (Stephens, 2014). Women tend to focus on the suspect's eyes to sense his or her motive, while men tend to take note more of the build and arm length. Many experts say that children are the best witnesses in general. Their recall of incidents should, therefore, be protected. Interviewing them should be left to expert investigators. Very young children should be allowed to freely speak rather than asked specific or leading questions. But in the overall, investigators should cultivate rapport with the witnesses. Among the techniques in establishing rapport with witnesses are mirroring or matching, reading their body language and the Reid Technique (Stephens).

Legal Issues

These mainly surround the use of trickery and deceit (Reid, 2014). Interrogators depend very much on the value of implication and innuendos when eliciting responses from suspects. It is admitted that almost every interrogation has at least an implied or veiled deceit. The investigator often tells the suspect that he has no doubt that he committed the crime and wants to find out why he did it. This is often not the true purpose of the interrogation...

The investigator may even express the confidence that the suspect is decent and honorable. Legally, these intentionally false statements are only the investigator's own beliefs and are not considered trickery or deceit. There is a distinction between stating a false belief, which is generally considered acceptable, and one of an extreme kind, which can even discourage or suppress a confession. False statements meant to obtain a confession or admission should not lead to a point of producing false evidence. A legal guide, which evolved from the Cayward case, was made between false assertions, which are often acceptable, and fabricating evidence, which is not permissible. The Cayward case produced a false crime laboratory report. Another example of fabricated evidence is producing an audiotape of a pretended eyewitness. Deliberate falsehoods, which are not related to the facts of the crime, are not allowed and should be avoided. Investigators may not lie about legal or administrative procedures or issues (Reid).
These are the guidelines for investigators in determining if their false statements may suppress a possible confession (Reid, 2014). First, the investigator may not express a false belief or opinion on legal issues, such as the suspect's past offense, if any. Second, investigators may use visual materials but not producing them from manufactured evidence through deceitful means. Third, investigators must use much caution in making false or insinuating statements with suspects with mental or intellectual defects who may believe the investigators' false statements more than their own recall of events, persons or items. And investigators may not directly connect the suspect to a crime when a reasonable recall is not possible or reliable on account of intoxication or trauma or repression. In the overall, lying to suspects should be the last option in overcoming…

Sources used in this document:
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Reid, J.E. (2005). Trickery and deceit during an interrogation. John E. Reid and Associates. Retrieved on June 22, 2014 from http://reid.com/educational_info/r_tips.html?serial=1107286261495331&print=[print]

Stephens, S.L. (2014). To interview or interrogate -- know the difference. Net Places:

About.com. Retrieved on June 21, 2014 from http://www.netplaces.com/private-investigation/interviewing-and-interrogation/to-interview-or-interrogate-know-the-difference.htm
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Torture and Interrogation Essay
Words: 6804 Length: Document Type: Essays

The Rationale for and the Efficacy of Torture during Interrogation Although information from interrogational torture is unreliable, it is likely to be used frequently and harshly. ==John W. Schiemann, 2012 Introduction The epigraph above is indicative of the growing consensus concerning the lack of efficacy of torture in providing interrogators with reliable concealed information Concealed information is the foundation of the majority of security issues. In most cases, concealed information is a situation

The Cost Effectiveness in Cloud Computing Within an Accounting Organization...
Words: 4615 Length: 15 Document Type: Research Paper

The Cost Effectiveness of Cloud Computing within an Accounting Organization Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Significance of the Topic 4 1.3 Research Problem 5 1.4 Research Questions 5 1.5 Purpose of the Study 5 1.6 Methodology 5 1.7 Good Title for Study 5 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Cloud Computing Definition 6 2.2 Types of Cloud Computing Services 6 2.2.1 Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) 6 2.2.2 Platform as a Service (PaaS) 7 2.2.3 Software as a Service (SaaS) 7 2.3

Referral Never Mind if You
Words: 3241 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

Kinesics interviewing identifies and "interprets a range of verbal and nonverbal, conscious and unconscious behavior" (Ibid) that individual typically exhibit when questioned. The more definite the pattern of an individual's observed behaviors, the more likely the person being questioned is being "being evasive or untruthful." No single behavior, however, stands alone or can serve as absolute proof regarding the validity of a statement. Instead, a combination of behaviors need to

Constitutional Legal and Ethical Issues in Criminal Justice
Words: 4668 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

Constitutional, Legal and Ethical Issues in Criminal Justice Police abuse remains one of the most serious and divisive human rights violations in the United States. The excessive use of force by police officers, including unjustified shootings, severe beatings, fatal chokings, and rough treatment, persists because overwhelming barriers to accountability make it possible for officers who commit human rights violations to escape due punishment and often to repeat their offenses. Police or

Judical Review of Indefinate Detention
Words: 4831 Length: 14 Document Type: Assessment

The court pointed out that the reason next friend status is observed to occur almost exclusively among prisoner's relatives is because a family member typically decides to step in when the competence of the prisoner is in question. The Court also argued that this case was easily distinguished from Hamdi (2002) because Newman already had a preexisting relationship with Padilla. The government also argued that the District Court of the

Suicide by Cop
Words: 3327 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Suicide by Cop Trying to commit suicide has been happening since long, as also attempts to slay police officials. But, the mishmash between the two is a development that exposes the police officials to risk. Literally, "suicide by cop" indicates a police official who takes his own life; ideologically it pertains to someone who gets himself executed by an official. At times it can imply the two. The intention of somebody

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now