Verified Document

NCLB The No Child Left Thesis

The Act also has the chance to widen, not lessen, the gap between rich and poor. Poorly funded schools will have fewer tools with which to reach and teach all students. Well-funded schools will have access to the best materials, technologies, and teachers. Students attending poorly funded schools are, in my opinion, being penalized for circumstances beyond their control. No Child Left Behind is leaving many of our most talented students behind. Neill (2003) echoes my sentiments, claiming "NCLB is a fundamentally punitive law that uses flawed standardized tests to label schools as failures and punish them with counterproductive sanctions." Ironically, the official Department of Education Web site seems stuck in its own circular reasoning. The Department of Education offers no clear solutions for how to improve "consistently low-performing schools," but points out that many children are "trapped" in them. As they mature, students left behind at an early age grow cynical because the public education system seems stacked strongly against them. I believe that rebelliousness and delinquency in the adolescent years reflects a justifiable realization that the school system is inherently flawed. Emphasizing a narrow bandwidth of knowledge using standardized math and language tests denies the glory of music, art, and athletics in students' lives. Yet No Child Left Behind assesses a school's "adequate yearly progress," using language that seems to tolerate if not encourage mediocrity. Testing students annually does more to increase the achievement gap than it does to reduce instances of individual or school failure.

Teachers are frustrated with No Child Left Behind. The Act pressures educators to teach mainly or only that which can be applied to the standardized tests. Essentially, teachers are teaching students how to do well on their tests instead of helping students learn. The same can be said for what the tests mean for school principals and administrators. Proponents of No...

In fact, "rising test scores are primarily the result of repetitive drilling for the narrow content the exams cover, not real educational improvements," and teachers are teaching less than ever before ("Reality-Testing NCLB"). Any student who does not show quick and sudden testing aptitude will become a quick casualty of the No Child Left Behind Act. English Language Learners and student with learning disabilities become obstacles in the classroom. Teachers, knowing their very livelihoods are at stake, focus more and more on who can score well and less on who they can write off as being hopeless.
Proponents of the No Child Left Behind Act would claim that standardized tests measure core and essential language and mathematical skills. Those skills must be mastered if students are to discover academic and later, professional success. I agree, of course. However, no standardized test can measure the infinite variety of learning styles in the human species. Standardized tests assume that all students learn the same way, at the same pace, and in the same language. Especially in a heterogeneous society that claims to honor diversity, standardized tests seem like a woefully outmoded way of assessing students and schools. As a counselor or as an administrator, I would suggest rethinking the nature of assessment. I would argue that public education policy must move away from standardized testing and toward deep and meaningful structural changes.

References

Neill, M. (2003). Don't Mourn, Organize! Rethinking Schools Online. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/nclb181.shtml

Reality-Testing NCLB." Fair Test. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at http://www.fairtest.org/realitytesting-nclb

United States Department of Education. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at http://answers.ed.gov/cgi-bin/education.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=4

Sources used in this document:
References

Neill, M. (2003). Don't Mourn, Organize! Rethinking Schools Online. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/nclb181.shtml

Reality-Testing NCLB." Fair Test. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at http://www.fairtest.org/realitytesting-nclb

United States Department of Education. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at http://answers.ed.gov/cgi-bin/education.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=4
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

NCLB No Child Left Behind NCLB Ensures
Words: 828 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

NCLB No Child Left Behind (NCLB) ensures "test-driven accountability" in public schools (Center on Education Policy, n.d.). As it has in other schools, NCLB has improved some areas of student outcomes, but not all. The school has dramatically shifted its policies and procedures, which has affected teachers and the overall structure and learning environment of the school. The changes to our school in Brooklyn include a shift in the allocation of

NCLB No Child Left Behind:
Words: 2663 Length: 9 Document Type: Thesis

It has already been noted that schools have had to trim down on the subjects that are being taught, and the depths to which certain subjects are taught, and this ha of course had a direct effect on teachers' ability to both direct their own teaching and serve what many feel is the true purpose of their work as teachers -- providing true cultural knowledge and critical thinking rather

Child Left Behind Legislation
Words: 1663 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

An Explication of Selected Titles of No Child Left Behind Legislation In sum, during the period from 2002 through 2015, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) became the primary law in the United States concerning the general education of young people in grades K through 12. Some of the provisions of NCLB, especially those involving minorities and migrant children, were contentious because they operated to penalize schools that failed to demonstrate sustained

No Child Left Behind Act-
Words: 4609 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

(No Child Left behind Act Aims to Improve Success for All Students and Eliminate the Achievement Gap) Parents will also gain knowledge regarding how the quality of learning is happening in their child's class. They will get information regarding the progress of their child vis-a-vis other children. Parents have of late been given the privilege to ask for information regarding the level of skills of the teachers. It offers parents

No Child Left Behind -
Words: 5384 Length: 16 Document Type: Term Paper

For Bush, the "formation and refining of policy proposals" (Kingdon's second process stream in policymaking) came to fruition when he got elected, and began talking to legislators about making educators and schools accountable. Bush gave a little, and pushed a little, and the Congress make its own changes and revisions, and the policy began to take shape. The third part of Kingdon's process stream for Bush (politics) was getting the

No Child Left Behind President
Words: 2969 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Many states don't want to lower their standards, including Minnesota, New Hampshire and Hawaii, and legislators have seriously debated withdrawing from NCLB, even though it would mean they would lose federal money that is tied to it. However, as the first national suit points out, no funding except the promised NCLB funding is supposed to be tied to it; the Education Department has apparently been making its own interpretation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now