Verified Document

Nature Or Nurture Nature Vs. Nurture Is Term Paper

Nature or Nurture Nature vs. Nurture

Is one shaped by nature or by nurture? This question of nature vs. nurture has been the center of controversy since the beginning of time. Insomuch, some feel that a living organism, such as animals, human beings, or cells may be influenced by external or internal stimuli based on one's environment. With such a huge divergence of perspectives on the issue, the nature-nurture debate is prominent in the academia arena with respect to intelligence. Although the dispute has its complexities, the two positions' essential elements are simple. Nature entails the genetic, inherited traits that a person possesses. Smart parents pass their good genes onto their children just as dull parents do. The result is smart and dull children, respectively. Nurture entails all of the environments, the variables outside the body in which a person experiences, such as books, teachers, parental love, and other helpful or harmful forces predominantly determine human intelligence. Hence, the nature vs. nurture argument is mostly moot today.

History

If one is disposed to the nature position, he or she is a nativist; to the nurture position, an environmentalist (Winkler, 2012). One should note that a great deal of diversity exists within these groups. Some environmentalists disbelieve the impact of genetics entirely. Others are more moderate, recognizing nature's impact. The same could be said of...

Most nativists recognize that environments influence intelligence just as most environmentalists understand the importance of genes. Both parties just believe that their favored variable is more influential than their opponent view. "They both recognize that many have thought about intelligence (e.g., Plato), but they agree that the modern study of intelligence began in the late 19th and early 20th century" (Winkler, 2012).
Environmentalists and nativists also acknowledge the early modern era's predominant conclusions: Intelligence was mostly determined by genetic inheritance, it can be objectively measured (IQ tests), and it is largely abstract reasoning (Winkler, 2012). However, parties only agree on the existences, but not in their accuracies. Although the environmentalist opposition was initially a small minority, it has become the majority view.

Essential Characteristics

For environmentalists, the premise is one initially dominated by immorality, but later by justice. Many used nativists' ideas to justify racism, sexism, and other bigotries and persecutions. Later, justice prevailed as researchers showed that nativist claims were scientifically invalid and immoral. Hence, researchers demonstrated that African-Americans were not biologically inferior to Whites, sterilization was not a wise policy, and tolerance of such ideas was misguided (Winkler, 2012). Later, objective scientists conducted research that demonstrated important findings, including the IQ gaps between ethnic groups (Jensen, 1969). The most controversial gap was and is the Black -- White IQ gap where Black IQs were significantly less than White IQs. Many claimed that the tests found a disparity because they favored White test-takers. Tests were not culturally neutral, but culturally biased. Some even argued that nativists who argued for the gap's validity…

Sources used in this document:
References

Gottfredson, L., & Saklofske, DH (2009). Intelligence: Foundations and issues in assessment. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50, 183-195.

Healy, J.M. (2011). Impacting readiness: Nature and nurture. Exchange: The Early Childhood Leaders' Magazine Since 1978, (198), 18-21.

Jensen, A.R. (1969, Winter). How much can we boost I.Q. And scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.

Murdoch, S. (2007). IQ: A smart history of a failed idea. New York, NY: Wiley.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Nurture Wins Nature/Nurture the Debate of Nature
Words: 1284 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Nurture Wins Nature/Nurture The debate of nature vs. nurture has persisted with intensity over time. Some scholars contend that this debate can be traced back to the times of ancient Greece. In the debate, nature may be referred to as nativism, or innatism. The side of nature contends that a person's natural, in-born, or innate qualities have more of an influence over the person's life. Nurture refers to personal experience, context, and

Nature Vs. Nurture in Criminology
Words: 1741 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Nature vs. Nurture in Criminology The nature/nurture issue has been a controversy in professional circles for many years. In criminology then, some hold that criminal behavior is socially (nurture) influenced, while others are of the opinion that genetics (nature) play a substantial role. While it is true that the environment in which a person is raised plays an important role in possible criminal tendencies, studies show that the innate nature of

Nature Vs. Nurture ADHD As an Example
Words: 1146 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Nature vs. Nurture ADHD as an Example of Nature vs. Nurture There are several schools of thought that address the way in which human beings develop their personality and behavioral traits. Some psychologists believe that traits tend to be innate, written into the individual's genetic code and thus inborn and largely predicted from conception (Gonzales-Mena, 2009). On the other hand, other psychologists believe that while individuals have genetic traits that may predispose

Nature and Nurture in the
Words: 1132 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

We're taking the radical position that the smarter thing is to just say 'neither' -- to throw out the debate as it has been historically framed and embrace the alternative perspective provided by developmental systems theory." (Science Daily, 2009) And research does seem to suggest that such a view is valid. Jay Belsky and Michael Pluess (2009), for example, review the related literature concerning the concept of plasticity to show

Nature Vs. Nurture in an
Words: 844 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

The general public has come to accept the sway of almighty genes in the human personality and destiny (De Waal). Studies of the behaviors of chimpanzees and bonobos illustrate striking similarities to human behaviors and suggest evolution and kinship (De Waal 1999). These range from politics, child rearing to violence and morality. There is no place for a blank slate. Human beings are naturally selfish and aggressive or they have

Nature Vs. Nurture Debate: Since
Words: 606 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Since personality disorders are inherited, it can be assumed that overall personality traits are inherited from parents. Generally, people with similar characteristics have similar personalities since it's hereditary. Self-Confidence: The question on whether people are born with self-confidence or they are taught on developing this aspect is a fundamental issue about the nature vs. nurture debate. In the view of self-confidence being developed from environmental influences, it's basically stated that an

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now