Nature-Nurture and Language Development
The development of language in an individual is considered as an antecedent from the cognitive ability that is found to be enacted from the genetic structure which helps in the retention and effective utilization of language in the early stages of life. However, the external stimuli with respect to culture and environment also play an effective role in the language development. Moreover, the application of language development program in the computers and machines has provided the evidence for the co-existence about the phenomena of nature and nurture for the learning capability.
Role of nature in the process of language development
Role of nurture in the process of language development
Computer Generated Speech and nature-nurture debate in human language development
REFERENCES
Role of nature in the process of language development
The progressive process of language development provides individuals with a way to communicate and express their thoughts either verbally or nonverbally, however, the language development is not considered to be simple. The acquisition of a language from an individual depends on the various spans of life which start from the infants age who are unable to understand the language and within a year; they start to understand some words. It has been observed that on average a two-year-old can possess the knowledge of about two hundred words which further increases up to the average of twenty thousand words per individual in the adulthood (Hoff, 2013).
It has been argued that that the process of language development is controlled by the internal stimuli because the children who are in the learning process of language do not learn only everything they hear but also learn the selective parts of language i.e. small words and then put them on use to express themselves. According to Sigelman and Rider (2014); it has been incurred by the experts that every individual possesses the universal grammar, which is considered as a built-in mechanism in our brain. During the span of language acquisition, the development of language in the brain takes place systematically. The children for instance, start learning the words even before they reach the age of one and after that they learn the exact use of phrase and combination of sentences in order to express themselves and start a conversation.
The evolutionary nature of life indicates that a man has adapted to great extent in order to maintain his survival and the notion has been developed in this respect that one's learning has been passed through the genes. The gradual learning of the earliest men kept transferring and only the useful knowledge in the genes lasted while deteriorating the useless information. However, the process of mutation with respect to slight changes in the DNA kept occurring and made the men special and able to speech as compared to other evolutionary species i.e. apes. The gene which represents the language is known as FOXP2 which is responsible for the growth and development of brain structure. Individuals who are found to be mutated in this type of gene encounter a lack of speech mechanism and do not possess the understanding of complicated words or sentence structure (Ardit&Ginzburg, 2013). A similar gene is also found in animals with slight structural changes which represents the song birds. Therefore, the development of language is a natural phenomenon which is learnt with the help of genetic structures that is possessed by an individual in order to retain what has been passed on to him for generations and learn with the sequential dimensions of language.
The development and understanding of language with respect to genetic tone indicates the notion that an individual may learn a second language but the genetic knowledge which prevail the native language effect the accent and subtle-effect of that language. Therefore, language is not considered as an ever-changing phenomena. It is rather found to be impacted with the genetic structures that one possess (Hoff, 2013). The study being conducted in this respect provided the evidence that the German kids were able to talk in Thai language when they learnt this language as a native but to some extent their accent was not found to be native due to the fact that their genetic structure was not mutated enough to adapt this way. Prior studies have also provided the evidence that an individual in his early span of life tends to learn the language other than the native language which are in accordance with its tone and provides resemblance; otherwise the difference with respect to the accent and complete adaption of the language will persist.
It has also been...
Finally, nativists must concede that culture and native language can shape ideas in the long run. After all, a person's cultural surroundings seem to greatly affect their interpretation of experiences over the course of their life (Bowerman and Choi 475-476). The difference in how much those cultural experiences affect an individual and their language, as well as when such effects happen, is what makes up the entire debate between
These results are quite striking considering that the mothers come from non-professional backgrounds and had no more than 12 years of schooling on average. Another study on low-income mother-child dyads shows that the rate of vocabulary production is also positively influenced by early exposure to diverse words. In particular, children whose mothers consistently used more varied vocabulary had faster and more linear growth in child vocabulary production between 14
The reality is that the universal grammar theory attempts to lay general structures that can be traced among languages. Therefore, if a constant 'X' is true then 'Y' will be equally true. It puts down how all languages expand when subjected to a given set of fundamental principles. With these principles, universal grammar enables us to try out word order prediction in languages, the phonemes, syntax etc. Several linguists hold
The general public has come to accept the sway of almighty genes in the human personality and destiny (De Waal). Studies of the behaviors of chimpanzees and bonobos illustrate striking similarities to human behaviors and suggest evolution and kinship (De Waal 1999). These range from politics, child rearing to violence and morality. There is no place for a blank slate. Human beings are naturally selfish and aggressive or they have
Nature vs. nurture debate has been the center of discussion for many years. Some believe that human behavior is created naturally while others believe that human behavior evolves over time. The purpose of this discussion is to discuss both sides of issue and to develop an opinion about which side seems more accurate. Let's begin our discussion by explaining the nature vs. nurture debate. Nature vs. Nurture The first recorded experiment concerning nature
It seems unbelievable how infants go from not knowing anything at all, to knowing how to express themselves in every way they can. They first learn how to tell their parents what they want by either pointing or yelling until they get what it is that they want, to actually putting words together to tell them exactly in the language that parents will understand. The question still arises as
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now