Verified Document

Naturalism Most Marxian's, In Addition Research Paper

You may be more hospitable to a Christian-Marxian possibility. The reason that this is the way that things stand in Marxian discussions of such issues, and that there is little argument for naturalism in Marxianism, is that Marxians, like George Santayana, who, politically speaking, was very conservative, just take it as obvious that physicalism and atheism are true (Nielsen, 1971). I think this is so too, but I realize that a good number of knowledgeable people do not, so I have in my writing about religion, my Marxianism notwithstanding, argued for naturalism. If one does not, one just side-steps argument and discussion with theists or Wittgensteinian fideists. That, for good or for ill, is where it is at in "the philosophy of religion game." I wish the philosophy of religion game would wither away (Allen, 1993). It seems to me to pose no intellectually challenging problems, but that notwithstanding, I like Gramsci and Durkheim, I think religion is a very important cultural phenomena indeed. Religion is not just superstition or just a bunch of intellectual blunders or cognitive mistakes. I agree with Marx Wartofsky's remarks, quoted at the beginning of this chapter, that an adequate materialist conception of religion could not so treat religion. but, as Wartofsky does too, I wish we would come to look at religion in good Durkheimian fashion as just an important cultural phenomena and orient ourselves, and orient our understanding of the world and our struggles in the world, in accordance with that perception. but, alas, we cannot just start there, if we wish to engage in the deliberations about religion going on in our society.

As long as there are thoughtful and informed Christians, Jews, and Moslems in our midst, we cannot, if we wish to carry on a discussion of religion which includes them too, just assume naturalism (Nielsen, 1971). So we must, in trying (perhaps hopelessly) to gain some reasonable consensus about the truth about our world, engage in the whole...

Mackie, Antony Flew, Wallace Matson, Michael Martin, Ronald Hepburn, and I have, hoping that someday we can push discussion on to the purely cultural territory on which Feuerbach, Marxians, Freudians, and Durkheimians have placed it: to come to ask not whether its doctrines are true, or reasonably to be believed to be true or rationally to be accepted solely on faith, but instead to consider questions concerning religion solely as questions about what role religion plays, should play, can come not to play, and should come not to play in society and in the lives of human beings (Nielsen, 1971).
Conclusion

Can human beings-not just a few relatively privileged individuals in a sea of religious people, but whole cultures of human beings -- live without religion? and, if they can, should they? These are some of the questions that we should be asking: these are questions that should be on our intellectual and moral agenda. Looking at things this way, among other things, provides common ground for discussion between physicalists-materialists-naturalists, on the one hand, and Jews, Christians, and Moslems, on the other. Here we have something that, standing where we stand now in cultural history, no thoughtful and informed person should think she has a good answer to.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, Barry. Truth in Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.

Nielsen, Kai. Contemporary Critiques of Religion. London: Macmillan Press, 1971;

Nielsen, Kai. Reason and Practice. New York: Harper and Row, 1971, 138-257,

Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism, xiv. He, in this famous remark, is quoting, with acknowledgment, Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception and Realty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976, 19.

Sellars, Wilfrid. Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,…

Sources used in this document:
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, Barry. Truth in Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.

Nielsen, Kai. Contemporary Critiques of Religion. London: Macmillan Press, 1971;

Nielsen, Kai. Reason and Practice. New York: Harper and Row, 1971, 138-257,

Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism, xiv. He, in this famous remark, is quoting, with acknowledgment, Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception and Realty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976, 19.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Worldview Perspective Insights From Considering Worldviews Creswell...
Words: 941 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

Worldview Perspective Insights from Considering Worldviews Creswell (2014) discusses four philosophical worldviews: post-positivism, constructivism, transformative, and pragmatism that can be applied to the proposed topic for this research is a comparison of brand loyalty among young people in the United States and Kenya. Each perspective carries different ramifications for studying the analysis of brand loyalty amongst the intended demographics. While many areas in Kenya are modernized and have incorporated Western views and

Worldview and Jesus Jesus' Worldview
Words: 1604 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

The view that we should forgive our enemies and those who hurt us, had a profound impact on me. There were a lot of people in my life who caused inexplicable pain and as a result of that pain; I had a lot of anger and hatred in my life. Jesus taught that we should forgive our enemies. This is one of the hardest things you can be asked to

Worldviews Worldview Is a Lens
Words: 1575 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

An American worldview assumes, for instance, that a person as the right to worship as he or she wishes. Not all cultures value religious freedom. Religion, culture, gender, socio-economic status, and nationality all impact worldview. Worldview in turn affects outlook on life in all its dimensions. Self-concept and identity are products of worldview, as people continually compare themselves to others. Beliefs about fundamental issues like human nature are related to

Worldview: Then and Now
Words: 2843 Length: 9 Document Type: Essay

Worldviews: Then and Now Having a worldview is something that has always been with society, but that has not been studied and focused on in such detail until recently. The original term came from German, as there was really no word for it in English. Now, it has a much more commonplace meaning, and is used more frequently to provide insight into how a person sees the world around him or

Worldviews, Their Development, and How
Words: 2116 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

It outlines those programs and benefits to be offered on campuses to help service international students more effectively. Japanese students are here identified. Since they speak English as second language, they have more stress, requiring more time to read their textbooks, receiving the abuse from students that are enrolled with them in classes or who are being taught by them when they serve as graduate assistants. This causes miscommunication

Worldviews of Americans in the
Words: 323 Length: 1 Document Type: Term Paper

The Puritans and early 19th century Americans also tended towards a pessimistic view of the world: the physical body and the physical universe were perceived as being inherently evil in conjunction with the concept of original sin. Death was therefore viewed as liberating. Because of westward expansion, 19th Century Americans cultivated more utopian visions and were generally more hopeful about the future of the United States. Furthermore, the Puritans

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now