In “Morality Influences How People Apply the Ignorance of the Law Defense,” Alter, Kernochan, Darley, et al. (2007) present the findings of four empirical studies showing how the perceived morality of the defendant influences decisions regarding determinations of guilt. In all four of the studies, the researchers found that laypeople will judge a defendant more harshly when the defendant is perceived of as an immoral person—regardless of whether the defendant claims ignorance of the law. The authors contend that the law should reflect the “moral intuitions” of the people, allowing for a differentiation between the actus reus (the criminal act) and the mens rea (criminal intent). Complicating matters is the fact that American legal precedent does not allow for an ignorance of the law defense; a person cannot hide behind claims to not know the law. A person who genuinely does not know that an act is criminal cannot have criminal intent: something that presents a moral conundrum for legal analysts. If intent is equated with moral culpability and thus, legal definitions of guilt, then the law must also be able to distinguish between genuine criminal intent and genuine ignorance. As Rosenweig (2013) puts it, the no-ignorance standard applies to crimes that are “self-evident wrongs,” and there are a slew of acts deemed criminal that are not necessarily self-evidently so (p. 1). A prime example would be not knowing that a certain...
Many laws are either obscure or too complex to understand, or breaking those laws might not actually cause harm.References
Alter, A.L., Kernochan, J., Darley, J.M., et al. (2007). Morality influences how people apply the ignorance of the law defense. Law & Society Review 41(4): 819-864.
Kerr, O. (2015). Ignorance of the law is no excuse: or is it? The Washington Post. 18 June, 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/06/18/ignorance-of-the-law-is-no-excuse-or-is-it/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2d31833157ad
Rosenweig, P. (2013). Ignorance of the law is no excuse, but it is reality. The Heritage Foundation. 17 June, 2013. https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/ignorance-the-law-no-excuse-it-reality
Legislating Morality The ideas of Thomas Hobbes, the influential English philosopher who lived in the late 1500s to middle 1600s, are still considered important today. Hobbes is best remembered for his ideas on political philosophy. While Hobbes throughout his life championed the idea of absolutism for the sovereign he also is responsible for many of the fundamentals of Western political thought such as equality of men, individual rights, and the idea
Bentham Utility Jeremy Bentham's philosophical theory of utilitarianism presented a unique metaphysic that may apply to some ways of practical though. The theory itself is an ethical guideline used to help present cases of morality. The theory, developed in the 19th century supposes that right action corresponds with the result that produces the most good. When an action has accomplished such a transition is said to have some sort of utility
not committed a crime-- an innocent person. Similarly, it might happen. that the general welfare is promoted by punishing people excessively -- a greater punishment might have a greater deterrent effect. But both of these are, on their face,.violations of justice, which Retributivism would never allow." (Rachels, 135) The danger presented here is one which threatens under any condition of ethical diversion. In the case of lying, there is an
Yet official Catholic support for union organizing and for strikes, and for state planning to ensure a decent livelihood for all, has been augmented over the years by a heightened recognition of the need to combat underlying institutional imbalances of power. Though the overarching goal of a peaceful and harmoniously ordered community endures, Catholic sensitivity to the dynamics of power, the reality of sinful systems and structures, and the
In principle, Dworkin argues that the truth is always knowable for any given factual circumstances; the difficulty is that the human intellect is imperfect. In the same way, there is a finite number of individual particles of sand on the earth at any moment in time. Human intellect and capabilities are incapable of determining that precise number; it would require a hypothetically limitless intellectual capacity. Judge Hercules possesses that
.." I have great difficulty with the idea that someone should give up having feeling and partiality of one's own. It seems that the ideal person would be more likely to respond spontaneously with emotion of one's own -- for something of the value of being human seems to be lost if one loses one's uniqueness of response. Moreover, it seems to devalue and destroy the self to deny that one's
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now