Verified Document

Morality From A Philosophical Perspective Essay

¶ … 2306 Kant. Consider situation: You ill life support. You a transplant organs continue living. Your parents decided biological child specifically organ transplant child / matures a level (assume part organ child survive) Kant's assumption on the present matter is reflected in the well-known maxim and law, "act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law." (Stanford, 2004) Most often this "law" is interpreted as being a set of questions one must ask himself before undergoing a certain action. More precisely, the first step in determining whether the course of action one is about to take is morally correct or not is to actually formulate that action and provide a reasoning for it. Secondly, it is important to consider that action and that reasoning multiplied at a universal level, thought of this action as being a universal law and one the world would need to follow. Thirdly, after consideration of the universe transformed by that maxim or action, one must see whether his own action would be possible in such a world where that action has become a law of nature. Finally, if the previous question yields a negative answer, according to Kant, that initial course of action is not to be followed, as it is morally wrong.

Such reasoning applied to the current situation, would produce most likely a mixed answer....

The morality behind such a choice needs to lie above the will to live and the love parents have for their child. Taking each step from the rational proposed by Kant would lead to a confusing answer particularly because there are underlining issues related to the duty of parents to care and take care of their child.
The first part of the line of thought applies to this case in the moment in which the parents need to decide on whether it is moral or not to bring a child into the world with the aim of saving his brother. This simple statement leads to the second part of the rational in which one would need to imagine that all the world would be full of people and children that are to a certain extent a "donor" for their siblings. Thirdly, would it be possible in such a world to have the initial action set in place? A natural answer would be yes. Finally, if the third question is answered affirmative, then the action can be deemed moral.

Taking into account the simple rational mentioned above, the actual complications that arise from the complexity of the situation make the answer to be less straightforward. In this sense, reverting to the first question, on the choice of the parents to have another child and to use his organs to save their first born. An important detail that may strengthen the decision to have that child is that the family would have wanted a…

Sources used in this document:
References

Kerstein, S. (2009) Treating Others Merely as Means in "Utilitas" Vol. 21, No. 2, June, University of Cambridge, available online at http://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/SKerstein/Kersteinmeremeans.pdf

New York University. (n.d) Means and ends. Available at http://philosophy.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1881/scanlon.pdf

Stanford Enciclopedia of Phylosophy. (2004) Kant's Moral Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/#ForUniLawNat
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Philosophical Perspective Action: I Decided
Words: 1103 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

However, when it comes to health-related issues, I do not believe that subjective personal impressions and feelings can influence one's ethical decision-making. The evidence is clear that smoking is harmful to the smoker, and also to the person who inhales second-hand smoke. Additionally, we were in my parents' home. I know that they have hard and fast rules about smoking on their property. My friend took a different point-of-view: he acquiesced

Life: A Philosophical Perspective the
Words: 1400 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

In this example, morality is decided by the gain, pleasure, and other self-interest of the individual donning the ring. Such individuals would more than likely obtain this gain by committing illicit activities, such as robbing a bank, but use their winnings for fairly self-absorbed means to further their consumption of whatever suits their fancy. Houses, cars, women and other material items would more than likely be procured, for the

Moral Realism Vs. Moral Relativism Philosophers Have
Words: 1021 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Moral Realism vs. Moral Relativism Philosophers have argued the merits or existence of moral realism and moral relativism for some time. Generally, the argument is designed as an either or proposition, where only one argument can be true. This is not necessarily true when one takes the time to explore what is meant by moral realism vs. moral relativism (Streitfeld). Essentially, moral realism is an objective view while moral realism is

Moral Philosophy It Is Contemporary Man's Tendency
Words: 575 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Moral Philosophy It is contemporary man's tendency to place himself atop of the evolutionary cycle of human development. Today's man with his technology and his gadgets believes that he is superior to his ancestors in many ways. Ancient philosophy and the mystery of its origins are still contemplated and studied in wide fashion today, but only by those who understand the timeless importance of truth and necessity. The purpose of this essay

Philosophical Analysis of Animal-Human Interactions Both Animal
Words: 1738 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Philosophical Analysis of Animal-Human Interactions Both animal rights and ecocentrism discourage hunting, although for different reasons. Thesis: Animal rights philosophy views hunting from a moral perspective, as the unnecessary infliction of suffering on sentient beings, no less immoral than the persecution of human beings. Ecocentrism views hunting from a perspective of self-interest, as an activity with unforeseeable consequences which could threaten the ability of many life-forms to sustain themselves on planet

Philosophical Theories
Words: 580 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Philosophical Legal Theory: Analyzing the Rhetoric in Civil Rights Speeches by King and Wallace While Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK) is remembered as a hero in the Civil Rights struggle, it is important to keep in mind that, during his time period, he was vilified by many who claimed that his efforts to secure equality for African-Americans were somehow unnatural. One of his most vocal opponents was George Wallace (Wallace), the

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now