Verified Document

Moral Relativism On The Surface Term Paper

Rule-breakers received swift punishment. Deviation from the norm was not tolerated by law or by social convention. Just because a moral standard helps create a stable society does not mean that moral standard is just, good, or right. Finally, the use of coercion itself denotes an unnatural moral standard. It takes relatively little coercion to ensure that most people don't murder or steal. Most children internalize the types of moral standards that Rachels generally accepts as universal. By extension, some moral standards may be universal throughout time. Rachels indirectly distinguishes between moral relativism and cultural relativism. Moral relativism assumes the total lack of universal ethical truths, the lack of any benchmark to measure right and wrong. Cultural relativism may refer to behaviors, customs and traditions that do not carry any moral stigma. Preferring potatoes over corn, or goat meat over chicken, is one way of describing cultural relativism that is not necessarily moral unless one culture believes it wholly immoral not to eat a certain type of meat. However, the ban on eating cloven-hooved animals in the Old Testament has little rational morality attached to it. As Rachels points out in Chapter 4, "Does Morality Depend on Religion?" The will of God expressed in religious text is not necessarily a sound base for logical moral arguments.

One of Rachels' main criticisms of moral relativism is its unsound logic. Just because a culture believes something to be true does not make it so. It is one thing to respect cultural differences and yet another to assume that the differences preclude value judgments. Moral progress evolves when a society changes its norms from within, to create social values that are rooted more in reason and common sense than in outmoded tradition. As Rachels points out, some societies may cling to the belief that the Earth is flat. Their belief is not morally wrong but it is nevertheless incorrect. To hold cultural relativism as the ultimate standard is to become unintelligent. Morality, like science, can point to proven truths....

Science evolves: what was believed true even a decade ago can be disproved today. Similarly, morality evolves. What was acceptable behavior last year may not be acceptable a decade from now.
Rachels does not entertain the possibility of moral devolution because although it is possible for a society to revert back to outmoded moral codes, it rarely happens. Although some feminists claim that back in the day societies were matriarchal and peaceful, evidence suggests the contrary. Most societies and cultures have rewritten their moral codes to reflect more enlightened values. It would be almost inconceivable to reinstate slavery in the United States or to wrest suffrage from women. One of the ways moral codes progress is through political protest and grassroots organization. Rachels mentions Martin Luther King as an example of how moral codes can progress as a result of social struggle. Another way moral codes can progress is from increased contact between cultures. The exchange of ideas can lead to moral progress. Without needing to force moral values on other cultures, a society can lead through example.

Thus, moral relativism and cultural relativism have their place. They prevent people from assuming absolute rational standards, and they encourage open-mindedness and tolerance (Rachels). Cultural relativism prohibits social Darwinianism, ethnocentrism, and arrogance. On the other hand, cultural relativism can be dangerous. Relativism can lead to apathy and passivity. If a person believes that morals are relative, based only on closed cultural codes, then killing, maiming, and beating can become condoned behaviors. Relativism leads us to look away when wives are being beaten by their husbands, or when businesses are cheated of their investments. Moral codes can and do evolve. They evolve out of necessity and out of the universal truth that some actions are inherently wrong because they cause pain and suffering for no apparent reason.

Works Cited

Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. 2nd edition. NY: McGraw Hill, 1995.

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. 2nd edition. NY: McGraw Hill, 1995.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Philosophy Ethical Relativism With a
Words: 857 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

But ultimately, in practice, relativism in action is saying that no system of ethics has been valid for all time, and relativism and subjectivism are constantly evolving in creative dialogue with history and other circumstances. For example, perhaps a long time ago, a division of labor between the sexes made sense, when brute force was necessary for survival, to catch game and to defend cities, and when women had

Ethics and Morality
Words: 602 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Ethics & Morality CURT RESPONSE TO STANLEY KURTZ In the wake of Senator Rick Santorum's comments drawing a parallel between legalizing gay marriage and legalizing incest, Contributing Editor Stanley Kurtz offered his analysis of the issue of gay marriage in the April 30, 2003 issue of National Review Online. According to Kurtz's convoluted logic, "The real danger of gay marriage is that it will undermine the taboo on adultery, thereby destroying the final

Philippa Foot
Words: 1659 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Foot: Moral Beliefs L. Jones Philippa Foot's Moral Beliefs The concept of moral relativism is extremely troubling for many. Indeed, the human animal is desperately in need of a certain "moral order," or an intense longing to have life's issues, events and decisions neatly classified into realms of "good" and "bad," "right" and wrong. However, as most individuals blessed with a life that stretches into adulthood know all too well, other's conceptions of

Locke or Berkeley
Words: 1213 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Locke v. Berkeley The philosophers John Locke and George Berkeley offer stark contrasts on the issue of various matters. Locke's whose viewpoint can best be classified as based in relativism. He believed that all knowledge come from the senses. As every man's senses are unique, no two individuals will sense the same experience the same and, therefore, all knowledge is different in each individual. By extension, there is no such thing

Managing Organizational Culture
Words: 9860 Length: 34 Document Type: Dissertation

Human Resources Managing Organisational Culture The values and behaviors that contribute to the unique social and psychological environment of an organization make up the organizations culture. Organizational culture is the summation total of an organization's past and current suppositions, incidents, viewpoint, and values that hold it together, and is articulated in its self-image, inner workings, connections with the outside world, and future prospects. In dealing with the management of organisational culture, it is

Army Ethics
Words: 3173 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

Ethical Issues Facing the Army Leadership Today The United States military is facing a host of ethical issues today. A number of allegations in recent months regarding questionable ethical behavior -- as well as that which is decidedly unethical -- have afflicted nearly every segment of the armed forces including the Navy, Air Force, National Guard, and the Marines. Moreover, these instances of amoral and immoral behavior have also been widely

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now