Verified Document

Mobile / Sprint Merger Within The More Essay

¶ … Mobile / Sprint Merger Within the more and more dynamic and challenging economic, social and technological context, the economic agents devise a wide array of coping mechanisms. One common means in which they strive to consolidate their competitive positions is through mergers and acquisitions. These imply the unification of two traditional competitors in a means in which mutual benefits are created, such as wider access to the market, know how, expertise, resources and so on.

Today, a piece of news which torments the American business community is related to the potential merger between mobile telephone monoliths T-Mobile and Sprint. It is the opinion of this study that the merger would be of a positive impact for the two firms. The following lines reveal the rationale for this conclusion.

The financial state of the companies

Data is not available for the entire 2010 fiscal year, but the information which is available indicates a difficult year, in which the profits of the two organizations registered negative increase rates. The main reason for this situation is generated by the internationalized economic crisis which has reduced the purchasing powers of consumers. The result is acceptable and explainable in a context in which the demand for mobile telephones and the adherent services is strictly pegged to the overall state of the economy and to the consumer spending capabilities.

At a more numeric level, the financial situations of the two organizations are revealed by the following:

T-Mobile registered a 0.5 per cent decrease in revenues at the end of the third quarter in 210 as opposed to the same period in 2009

T-Mobile registered a 0.10 billion decrease in the operating income adherent to the third quarter of 2010 comparative to the same period of 2009. The costs registered were also increased and the organizational emphasis is currently on revenue stabilization (T-Mobile Website, 2011).

Sprint's revenues increased from $32,260 million in 2009 to $32,563 million in 2010

Sprint's gross profits decreased from $15,825 million in 2009 to $15,071 million in 2010 (Bloomberg Businessweek, 2011).

3. The impact of a merger on...

This raises additional complexities at the level of the stakeholders in the sense of understanding the impacts on the stockowners in the U.S. And those outside the United States. The impact depends strictly on the company and the terms of the merger. For instance, in a context in which the merger implies the sell of the American subsidiary to the Sprint Nextel and the complete break from the German parent company, the international stockowners could benefit from increased dividends as a result of the sale of the subsidiary.
At the level of the American stockholders, the merger could imply either losses, either gains. For instance, the initial loss could be represented by the loss of centralized financials with the rest of the T-Mobile subsidiaries. The gains could however be derived from the registration of higher gains as a result of the merger. It is even possible for the investors -- the smaller ones that is -- to more profitably trade the stocks on the secondary market.

4. The impact of a merger on the Sprint shareholders

At the level of the Sprint Nextel stockowners, the impact depends on the nature of the merger. At an immediate state, it would be possible for the company shares to either suddenly fall or increase, creating as such turmoil, opportunities and threats within the stock market. Also, since the merger is expected to be complicated and expensive, it is possible for the newly formed company to withhold the distribution of dividends and to use the financial resources for the consolidation of the merger and the integration of the two organizations.

Within the long-term however, the merger is expected to create positive financial opportunities for the Sprint Nextel stockholders. In essence, the new corporation would be stronger, more competitive and more financially capable. This means that it would reveal increased abilities to reward its shareholders.

5. Potential profitability of the merger

The first and foremost important element which has to be noted at…

Sources used in this document:
References:

2010, Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) and T-Mobile merger rumors return after comments from Sprint CEO, American Banking & Marketing News, http://www.americanbankingnews.com/2010/07/15/sprint-nextel-nyse-s-and-t-mobile-merger-rumors-return-after-comments-from-sprint-ceo / last accessed on February 24, 2011

2011, Sprint Nextel Corp, Bloomberg Businessweek, http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/financials/financials.asp?ticker=S:U.S. last accessed on February 24, 2011

2011, T-Mobile USA reports third quarter 2010 results, T-Mobile website, http://www.t-mobile.com/Cms/Files/Published/0000BDF20016F5DD010312E2BDE4AE9B/5657114502E70FF3012B59F6EC3E60E2/file/TMUSQ32010PressReleaseFinal%5B1%5D.pdf last accessed on February 24, 2011

2011, T-Mobile closing its doors in 2011? Not so fast! Tmo News, http://www.tmonews.com/2010/07/t-mobile-closing-its-doors-in-2011-not-so-fast / last accessed on February 24, 2011
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Mobile-Sprint Merger a Merger Between T-Mobile and
Words: 1875 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Mobile-Sprint Merger A merger between T-Mobile and Sprint could produce shareholder value for both companies because both companies are underperforming as stocks and both companies' fortunes rest on the prepaid smartphone market. Both corporations trail market share leaders AT&T and Verizon, with Sprint 3rd and T-Mobile 4th. Many believe that if these companies do not make a major move soon, they could be squeezed out of the market. Deutsche Telekom has

Merger the First Step in
Words: 826 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

The smaller firms therefore may be able to gain entry into the market but are generally unable to compete on quality with the top firms, and this is allowing the market leaders to grow as a result. Another factor that is taken into consideration is the regulatory entry and exit conditions. In the mobile industry, there is a significant barrier in spectrum. Given that there is a finite amount of

Sprint Nextel Merger History of
Words: 4904 Length: 18 Document Type: Term Paper

The transaction was all-cash and was estimated at approximately $4.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $900 million of net debt. Before acquiring Alamosa, Sprint Nextel Corporation was involved in some litigation issue with one of Alamosa Holdings' subsidiaries, AirGate PCS Inc. Therefore, completing the Alamosa acquisition brought final resolution in this matter. Alamosa was one of Sprint's most important affiliates before the merger with Nextel and the acquisition

Market Plan Mobile Phone
Words: 4408 Length: 11 Document Type: Research Paper

Goldenline Market Plan Golden Line will prove to the business community that it is the most prestigious technology firm in the industry. With an increase in technological advancement, Golden Line will pave the way for the future in the electronics industry. Golden Line intends to dominate the mobile phone industry by launching unbelievable items. The company's smart phones will be incomparable to competition with Motorola and Samsung. The new products will

Telecommunications Industry Has Transformed the
Words: 2843 Length: 11 Document Type: Term Paper

T-Mobile T-Mobile is actually a business of Deutsche Telekom. According to a profile of the company, T-Mobile International manages Deutsche Telekom's wireless operations (T-Mobile International Profile). These operations are inclusive of T-Mobile (UK), T-Mobile Deutschland, and T-Mobile Austria. Additionally, the profile explains that T-Mobile International also operates in the United States through the acquisition of VoiceStream Wireless and Powertel (T-Mobile International Profile). The company is now known as T-Mobile USA and

Economic Model for Monopoly Analysis
Words: 14390 Length: 30 Document Type: Term Paper

The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now