Mixed Method Designs Compare and Contrast
From the onset, it would be prudent to note that in a convergent parallel design, the researcher partakes in the collection as well as analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data within a similar timeframe or within the very same research process phase (Creswell and Clark, 2011). On the other hand, exploratory sequential design features several phases which are inclusive of; the collection and analysis of qualitative data, the collection and analysis of quantitative data, and the amalgamation of data from both. Third, Clark and Ivankova (2015) point out that in explanatory design, quantitative data collection as well as analysis is first undertaken, followed by qualitative data collection and analysis. When it comes to the embedded design, Creswell and Clark (2011) are categorical that quantitative data is collected and analyzed first, followed by qualitative data (93). Next, in relation to the transformative design, the collection, analysis as well as interpretation of quantitative as well as qualitative data is combined (Creswell and Clark, 2011). Lastly, we have the multiphase design. On this front, a number of study designs are utilized. Thus, it should be noted that this would largely involve the conduction of multiple mixed methods projects.
It would be prudent to note that when it comes to the similarities, convergent parallel design and embedded design are similar in the sense that the collection of qualitative and quantitative data takes place within the same period of time. On the other hand, explanatory and exploratory sequential designs are similar in the sense that there are different phases for the collection and analysis of both qualitative and quantitative data. It should, however, be noted that whereas quantitative data is collected first in the former (i.e. in the case of explanatory design), qualitative data is collected first in the latter (i.e. in the case of exploratory design). The convergent parallel design is also similar to the transformative design to the extent that the collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data is combined.
References
Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE.
Clark, V.L. & Ivankova, N.V. (2015). Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. SAGE.
Mixed Methods Study The comparison of the administrative procedures of five traditional and five non-traditional colleges of Education in religious studies. All institutions have to be accredited via a national agency and be part of interactive online courses in conjunction with computer-based technologies. This study will compare the differing forms of administrative procedures and their impact and manifestation on training, instructional support, additional compensation, teaching loads and the beneficial and negative influences
Variables that could increase the likelihood of insider threat can be certain personality traits or satisfaction levels revealed by employee questionnaires. If an employee, for example, believes that he or she is not receiving the full benefits merited by his or her service level or skill set within the company, it can be determined as more likely for this type of employee to act less ethically than those with
The author used open and then axial coding so that a larger image of the environmental issues would emerge from the data. Secondly, Torres analyzed the quantitative data by developing a model that reconfigured Nora et al.'s previously used scales. The data was tested by using "latent variable structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the data-model fit" (302) to examine the causal influences on why students stayed or did
Mixed Methods Study Design What's Wrong with Mixed Methodology Morris and Burkett (2011) witnessed the relatively recent emergence of what has been called "mixed methods" research. A study using a mixed methods design would meet both quantitative and qualitative evaluative criteria. From the author's perspective and that of others cited in their publication, quantitative and qualitative research designs are effectively mutually exclusive. The only concession that Morris and Burkett (2011) seemed to
Said factors certainly do nothing to discredit the relevance of this tool's use in qualitative research, but they do suggest that such research methodology may well be complimented by the implementation of additional data-gathering methods that is driven by quantitative measure. Namely, it should be seen as a primary benefit of the questionnaire that its ergonometry of inquiries should serve in a degree as a means to internal variable control.
Mixed Methods Benefits and challenges of Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed methods approaches to research Benefits and Challenges of Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach to Research In any type of research, it is possible to characterize a research's study methodology as qualitative, quantitative, or one that involves the two methods, in which case it becomes a mixed method approach. Moreover, the term research design is popular in research, but it takes varied
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now